Will AA eliminate ALL elite bonus miles like US Airways did today?
#16
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SJC/SFO/OAK
Programs: BD Gold (and future SEN), 0.2MM AA EXP, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 3,107
Or, they can do what actually would make some sense, reduce mileage earning for the very cheapest fares (no, I'm not giving them any ideas, this is how many non-US programmes already work) and perhaps at the same time increase the bonus for premium cabins. Presently, a PLT/EXP on a deep dicsount coach fare earns significantly more miles than a non-elite in paid first class, which is a bit odd.
If US airlines were to get rid of upgrades all together, they would probably have to configure their domestic aircraft with 12-18 premium Y seats (basically UA E+ with meal service), and the rest would be Y- other than a few very specific markets like the LAX/SFO/BOS/JFK/IAD/MIA transcons. I have a feeling that on international fleets, the number of seats is a little more right-sized, but we do know that UA reduced premium capacity by a significant amount across the fleet in their refurb, and AA stated that they were keeping the cabin the same size so that elites could still upgrade. Basically, there is no shortage of demand for Y travel, even mid and upper Y fares, but there isn't that same level of demand for premium travel. This is being exacerbated by the current economic conditions, with slashed travel budgets and more policies being amended PE and Y travel that used to be J.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,233
As I read it, it wouldn't affect elite qualification at all. The bonus miles being eliminated are redeemable miles (toward awards), not elite qualification miles.
#19
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 469
There are plenty of eviler things to do to try to earn revenue and encourage certain behavior, like baseing everything off of EQP's, and processing upgrades firstly by fare class (full fare, discount, deep discount), and then by elite status.
#21
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DCA, EGE, IAD
Programs: MR LTT, BA Gold, AA LTP, UA Silver
Posts: 6,078
If removing bonus miles stems from the obvious financial issues, then I can see a few ways to produce the same result:
1) remove the bonus miles (affects only elites)
2) increase the mileage requirements for redemption (affects everyone)
3) decrease redemption availability (affects everyone)
Seems as though #2 and #3 would be sufficient. AA has recently decided to implement #2, and it sure seems as though #3 is in effect (IME it's harder than before to score a 90k business AAward).
1) remove the bonus miles (affects only elites)
2) increase the mileage requirements for redemption (affects everyone)
3) decrease redemption availability (affects everyone)
Seems as though #2 and #3 would be sufficient. AA has recently decided to implement #2, and it sure seems as though #3 is in effect (IME it's harder than before to score a 90k business AAward).
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 10,968
Folks, I don't think we should be even talking about this issue! We don't want to tempt AA mgmt to consider it! (and we know AA monitors this forum)
If we discuss it, or discuss alternatives, we show that we are open to it. Bad idea! We should just outright refuse to accept it, as many on the US Airways forum have said.
If we discuss it, or discuss alternatives, we show that we are open to it. Bad idea! We should just outright refuse to accept it, as many on the US Airways forum have said.
#23
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 63,638
The question is how big a part of the total value proposition the mileage program represents.
For USAirways, I don't think it's as large as AA. American was the airline that pioneered the FF program, and they have a lot of partners. This is a core value proposition for the airline - not so much for USAir.
For USAirways, I don't think it's as large as AA. American was the airline that pioneered the FF program, and they have a lot of partners. This is a core value proposition for the airline - not so much for USAir.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 33,535
Folks, I don't think we should be even talking about this issue! We don't want to tempt AA mgmt to consider it! (and we know AA monitors this forum)
If we discuss it, or discuss alternatives, we show that we are open to it. Bad idea! We should just outright refuse to accept it, as many on the US Airways forum have said.
If we discuss it, or discuss alternatives, we show that we are open to it. Bad idea! We should just outright refuse to accept it, as many on the US Airways forum have said.
a) they're getting ideas from reading this thread that they have not already thought about- especially given that one of their competitors just did it.
b) they give a damn whether the few people here on FT might "accept" it.
While they do read FT, and have done things based on reading here, or working with some of us off line, I don't think they're looking here for revenue ideas or acceptance
Cheers.
#25
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SEA
Programs: AA Executive PLatinum CO Platinum DL Gold Hyatt Diamond Hilton no more :)
Posts: 1,958
The question is how big a part of the total value proposition the mileage program represents.
For USAirways, I don't think it's as large as AA. American was the airline that pioneered the FF program, and they have a lot of partners. This is a core value proposition for the airline - not so much for USAir.
For USAirways, I don't think it's as large as AA. American was the airline that pioneered the FF program, and they have a lot of partners. This is a core value proposition for the airline - not so much for USAir.
#26
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP. HHonors Diamond
Posts: 185
This would be very dangerous indeed. American, and really all of the legacy carriers, have lost any advantage of being better in terms of service, amenities, and planes. The LCCs like Jet Blue, F9, Virgin, etc seem to have better in flight amenities and newer planes. But none of them, IMO, can compare with the value of AAs FF program and AA needs to keep that alive and strong ... otherwise what really puts them ahead of other airlines in competitive markets?
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP, BA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton diamond, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 33,535
This would be very dangerous indeed. American, and really all of the legacy carriers, have lost any advantage of being better in terms of service, amenities, and planes. The LCCs like Jet Blue, F9, Virgin, etc seem to have better in flight amenities and newer planes. But none of them, IMO, can compare with the value of AAs FF program and AA needs to keep that alive and strong ... otherwise what really puts them ahead of other airlines in competitive markets?
All I'd lose is the extra RDM.
While I'd prefer that this not happen, the EXP benefits I get would still be there, and It'd still be better for me than the LCCs, not substantially different than it is now.
Cheers.
#28
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SEA
Programs: AA Executive PLatinum CO Platinum DL Gold Hyatt Diamond Hilton no more :)
Posts: 1,958
So, let's say that they did eliminate the bonus miles for elites. I'd still be able to get free domestic upgrades, something I can't do on WN (don't know about the others). I'd still get my eVIPs and be able to upgrade internationally. I'd still get additional help during IRROPS. I'd still get my free snacks on Eagle
All I'd lose is the extra RDM.
While I'd prefer that this not happen, the EXP benefits I get would still be there, and It'd still be better for me than the LCCs, not substantially different than it is now.
Cheers.
All I'd lose is the extra RDM.
While I'd prefer that this not happen, the EXP benefits I get would still be there, and It'd still be better for me than the LCCs, not substantially different than it is now.
Cheers.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Jo'burg, HK
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Lifetime Diamond, CX Gold, Mrs. Pickles travels for free
Posts: 13,163
One upside of them eliminating bonus miles is that I wouldn't feel any allegiance to AA on transpac to Japan and would switch to JL without feeling like I'm leaving miles on the table.
Right now, when I fly paid transpac I fly AA and use the accumulated miles + bonuses in JL J or F.
Right now, when I fly paid transpac I fly AA and use the accumulated miles + bonuses in JL J or F.
#30
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SJC/SFO/OAK
Programs: BD Gold (and future SEN), 0.2MM AA EXP, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 3,107
I hope you don't believe that:
a) they're getting ideas from reading this thread that they have not already thought about- especially given that one of their competitors just did it.
b) they give a damn whether the few people here on FT might "accept" it.
While they do read FT, and have done things based on reading here, or working with some of us off line, I don't think they're looking here for revenue ideas or acceptance
Cheers.
a) they're getting ideas from reading this thread that they have not already thought about- especially given that one of their competitors just did it.
b) they give a damn whether the few people here on FT might "accept" it.
While they do read FT, and have done things based on reading here, or working with some of us off line, I don't think they're looking here for revenue ideas or acceptance
Cheers.