Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA award flight cancelled due to schedule change

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2014, 11:44 am
  #106  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: AA MM Gold, HH Gold, SPG Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by airb330
I agree completely. I'm sorry the Twitter thing didn't work out and they also, inappropriately, labeled the surcharges as new taxes. I bet you are frustrated. I would be too!

With the JV, I guess I 'metal netral' doesn't mean what I would hope it would mean. AA really should have just put you on the new daytime flight and ate the surchages, if any at all would have been charged to them. for all we know, AA never pays them.

I hope AA keeps the US PHL-LHR flights around. I suspect they'll be gone. It will continue to be harder and harder to book flights to Europe without paying YQ I wouldn't mind a small fee, hell US already charges fees for "free" flights, but the YQ charges are crazy. PHL-LHR-PHL on US has $247.30 in taxes and fees in Economy. BA has $705.30 in taxes and fees in economy. Of course, the US flight ends up being about $1500 cheaper overall, with a good chunk of that being those 'taxes and fees' and this is on a paid ticket! Using miles, on those dates, an AAdvantage award would be 40,000 miles and $705.30 on BA (no US options). Yikes!
Yeah, that's the bit that annoys me the most. Their definition of metal neutrality doesn't seem to mean the same as one would expect it to.

I thought it would be fine when they said they were replacing the AA BOS-LHR directs with AA*, turns out in reality it's not such a good thing for consumers in my neck of the wood, especially if they have a bunch of miles to use!
dazza189 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 12:30 pm
  #107  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
Taxes, fees, etc. for PHL -> LHR (BA) -> PHL (BA) in Y:

BA YQ surcharge (YQ) $458.00
US International Departure Tax (US) $17.50
US September 11th Security Fee (AY) $2.50
US Passenger Facility Charge (XF) $4.50
USDA APHIS Fee (XA) $5.00
US Immigration Fee (XY) $7.00
US Customs Fee (YC) $5.50
United Kingdom Air Passengers Duty (GB) $111.60
United Kingdom Passenger Service Charge (UB) $66.20
US International Arrival Tax (US) $17.50
Total: $695.30
Austinrunner is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 1:16 pm
  #108  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,624
Originally Posted by airb330

I hope AA keeps the US PHL-LHR flights around. I suspect they'll be gone. It will continue to be harder and harder to book flights to Europe without paying YQ I wouldn't mind a small fee, hell US already charges fees for "free" flights, but the YQ charges are crazy. PHL-LHR-PHL on US has $247.30 in taxes and fees in Economy. BA has $705.30 in taxes and fees in economy. Of course, the US flight ends up being about $1500 cheaper overall, with a good chunk of that being those 'taxes and fees' and this is on a paid ticket! Using miles, on those dates, an AAdvantage award would be 40,000 miles and $705.30 on BA (no US options). Yikes!
On a paid ticket it makes no odds how the airline allocates the fare , whether it be all on fare or part fare , part surcharge

For BA , the lowest fare is $488 fare plus $458 surcharge plus taxes with total being $1187
For US, the lowest fare is $488 fare plus $458 surcharge plus taxes with total being $1187
For AA codeshared on BA, the lowest fare is $488 fare plus $458 surcharge plus taxes with total being $1187
For AA codeshared on US, the lowest fare is $946 fare plus taxes with total being $1187

Doesn't matter which of the 3 is booked, the total is the same, just the breakdown between fare and surcharge varies. Taxes are the same on all, so for a paid ticket it matters not what airline is used, the total is the same

The key issue for award bookings is that AA has agreed to collect BA surcharges on all travel booked on BA , including award tickets whilst AA ( unlike BA ) does not charge surcharges normally on award tickets

There is definitely a lack of neutrality here since for travel on AA, a BA member will be paying a lot more for an award ticket than an AA member will .

For true neutrality, perhaps AA should charge surcharges on all awards across the atlantic to be in line with BA , however it doesn't and AA members can come out very much ahead

For the OP, the airline cancelled a flight a long way in advance ( so even in the EU there would not even be any compensation due ) and rebooked on a flight which has the same award cost and gave the passenger choices and the passenger chose one that requires an overnight stay
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 2:02 pm
  #109  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: AA MM Gold, HH Gold, SPG Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
The key issue for award bookings is that AA has agreed to collect BA surcharges on all travel booked on BA , including award tickets whilst AA ( unlike BA ) does not charge surcharges normally on award tickets

There is definitely a lack of neutrality here since for travel on AA, a BA member will be paying a lot more for an award ticket than an AA member will .

For true neutrality, perhaps AA should charge surcharges on all awards across the atlantic to be in line with BA , however it doesn't and AA members can come out very much ahead
Or perhaps BA should not charge surcharges for it's awards on transatlantic routes to maintain the consumer choice that was present before the the anti-trust immunity was provided? Or perhaps AA shouldn't collect the surcharges on AA* award flights for the same reasons.

At the moment BA members come out behind - but nothing has changed for them. AA members have less choice and/or increased fees to accomplish the same thing that they used to.
dazza189 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 2:11 pm
  #110  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 789
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
On a paid ticket it makes no odds how the airline allocates the fare , whether it be all on fare or part fare , part surcharge

For BA , the lowest fare is $488 fare plus $458 surcharge plus taxes with total being $1187
For US, the lowest fare is $488 fare plus $458 surcharge plus taxes with total being $1187
For AA codeshared on BA, the lowest fare is $488 fare plus $458 surcharge plus taxes with total being $1187
For AA codeshared on US, the lowest fare is $946 fare plus taxes with total being $1187

Doesn't matter which of the 3 is booked, the total is the same, just the breakdown between fare and surcharge varies. Taxes are the same on all, so for a paid ticket it matters not what airline is used, the total is the same

The key issue for award bookings is that AA has agreed to collect BA surcharges on all travel booked on BA , including award tickets whilst AA ( unlike BA ) does not charge surcharges normally on award tickets

There is definitely a lack of neutrality here since for travel on AA, a BA member will be paying a lot more for an award ticket than an AA member will .

For true neutrality, perhaps AA should charge surcharges on all awards across the atlantic to be in line with BA , however it doesn't and AA members can come out very much ahead

For the OP, the airline cancelled a flight a long way in advance ( so even in the EU there would not even be any compensation due ) and rebooked on a flight which has the same award cost and gave the passenger choices and the passenger chose one that requires an overnight stay
My goodness, suggesting all the One World carriers sink to BA's standards is a bit drastic isn't it. The answer is simple, avoid BA and make sure Mr Parker and his colleagues are aware that trying to push AA fans onto BA services will be revenue negative. Trying to get BA to change its Business Standards is a fruitless task, particularly as IAG has only just returned to profit.

As prior post I suggest OP asks for routing from LGA via ORD on 90. This either means a 6.30 am flight same day or overnighting in ORD. Either way preferable to a red eye, in my book, and definitely better than paying BA for a "free"'ticket on a service which I find poorer than AA.

If you want carriers to align please choose the better ones like AA and JAL not BA or Iberia.
flyertalker54234 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 2:28 pm
  #111  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA - AA EXP 3MM
Posts: 2,756
If AA were to begin to collect carrier-imposed surcharges on transatlantic routes, it would need to change its redemption chart and disclosures. Customers would be alarmed. One imagines credit card partners would be alarmed. Indeed, if I were a bank buying $x million of miles per year, I think I'd want to make sure those are valuable so my card customers continue to want AA miles.

To date AAdvantage miles have been the gold standard -- even when AA's planes and route network were weak, some people (maybe some of us included) still went out of our way to earn AAdvantage miles. AA should hesitate before throwing that away. And actually I think they would be appropriately careful here. Fundamentally, this is one part of the old AA that is still basically working OK.
bedelman is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 3:28 pm
  #112  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
Originally Posted by dazza189
Or perhaps AA shouldn't collect the surcharges on AA* award flights for the same reasons.
AA does not collect the surcharges on codeshares because they are not bookable with AA miles (with one exception not applicable here).
Austinrunner is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 3:29 pm
  #113  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,624
Originally Posted by bedelman
If AA were to begin to collect carrier-imposed surcharges on transatlantic routes, it would need to change its redemption chart and disclosures. Customers would be alarmed. One imagines credit card partners would be alarmed. Indeed, if I were a bank buying $x million of miles per year, I think I'd want to make sure those are valuable so my card customers continue to want AA miles.
No it wouldn't. The chart did not change when the JBV started and AA started collecting BA surcharges. The booking details already discloses that there could be large amounts of carrier surcharges
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 3:31 pm
  #114  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,624
Originally Posted by rjlon
My goodness, suggesting all the One World carriers sink to BA's standards is a bit drastic isn't it. The answer is simple, avoid BA and make sure Mr Parker and his colleagues are aware that trying to push AA fans onto BA services will be revenue negative. Trying to get BA to change its Business Standards is a fruitless task, particularly as IAG has only just returned to profit.
.
Not really. If wanting to argue that the meaning of metal-neutral should be that the same should apply regardless of carrier, then it is just as valid an argument that the surcharges be collected on all transatlantic flights

If this was an arguable case, given the options of (a) all surcharges being dropped or (b) being applied regardless, I know which one I would think to be a more likely outcome
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 3:33 pm
  #115  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
Originally Posted by dazza189
Their definition of metal neutrality doesn't seem to mean the same as one would expect it to.
No one seems able to define that term in any authoritative way. So where does this "expectation" come from, other than just a personal desire for AA's policies to be a certain way?
Austinrunner is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 3:37 pm
  #116  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 789
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
Not really. If wanting to argue that the meaning of metal-neutral should be that the same should apply regardless of carrier, then it is just as valid an argument that the surcharges be collected on all transatlantic flights

If this was an arguable case, given the options of (a) all surcharges being dropped or (b) being applied regardless, I know which one I would think to be a more likely outcome
Fortunately there are other choices across the Atlantic so if the standards at Oneworld were lowered to BA there would be other options both direct to London and also via Europe or Canada.
flyertalker54234 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 5:01 pm
  #117  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: AA MM Gold, HH Gold, SPG Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
Not really. If wanting to argue that the meaning of metal-neutral should be that the same should apply regardless of carrier, then it is just as valid an argument that the surcharges be collected on all transatlantic flights

If this was an arguable case, given the options of (a) all surcharges being dropped or (b) being applied regardless, I know which one I would think to be a more likely outcome
I would say that as long as DL and UA offer flights with no surcharges for their frequent fliers I would expect AA management to be very reluctant to race to the bottom that way.
dazza189 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 5:17 pm
  #118  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: AA MM Gold, HH Gold, SPG Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by Austinrunner
No one seems able to define that term in any authoritative way. So where does this "expectation" come from, other than just a personal desire for AA's policies to be a certain way?
I think any reasonable person can work out what neutrality generally is given to mean and then apply that definition contextually here. Inequality is certainly not in my understanding of the definition.

As Dave argues above it could mean charging surcharges on AA awards too, but it could also mean something else. It's one of the things I specifically called out in my complaint - hopefully we can get an authoritative opinion on what it actually means from people who have the power to enforce that opinion.
dazza189 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 5:28 pm
  #119  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: AA MM Gold, HH Gold, SPG Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by Austinrunner
AA does not collect the surcharges on codeshares because they are not bookable with AA miles (with one exception not applicable here).
You are quite correct that they do not currently allow this. It's a neat trick.
I was only intending to point out there are other possible outcomes than simply enforcing surcharges on all AA award redemptions.
dazza189 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2014, 6:46 pm
  #120  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
A "neat trick"????
Austinrunner is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.