Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

Details/Discussion of Saver (Basic Economy) "X" Fares

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Nov 27, 2018, 7:54 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NoLaGent
How are Saver fares different?

Saver fares do include some restrictions on booking, refunds, changes, and seat selection.

These restrictions include:
  • Limited seating may be available at the time of purchase. Most seats will be assigned at check-in.
  • We can’t guarantee that parties of two or more will be seated together.
  • No refunds are allowed beyond the first 24 hours after ticketing.
  • No changes, including same-day confirmed changes, are allowed for Saver fares.
  • No standby is allowed for Saver fares, even for elite status guests.
  • If a guest is a no-show for any flight during a trip, all other flights within that trip are automatically canceled, with no refund available.
  • Saver fares cannot be combined with any other fare types on the same itinerary.
  • Saver fares are non-transferable.

Elite status benefits you do get when you buy a Saver Fare:
* Priority check-in
* Priority boarding group
* Baggage fee waiver
* Express security line at select airports (for MVPG+)
* Refreshments (alcoholic drink or chocolate for MVPG+)
* Complimentary inflight entertainment player - available on coast-to-coast and Hawaii flights (for MVPG75k, while they last)
* Bonus miles (by elite level)

Elite status benefits you don't get when you buy a Saver Fare:
* Access to preferred seating (certain seats behind Premium Class or in the exit rows)
* First Class upgrades, when available
* Premium Class upgrades, when available
* Waived change fees for MVPG+
* Complimentary same-day standby/flight changes for MVPG+

Full info here: https://www.alaskaair.com/content/tr...perience/saver
Print Wikipost

Details/Discussion of Saver (Basic Economy) "X" Fares

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2018, 9:58 am
  #406  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SEA, NW/DL 1.6Million Miler
Programs: DL 1MM Annual Silver,AS 100K 22-24, AS 75K 15-21
Posts: 4,278
Seriously, with this basic economy disguised as a small poison for elite level travelers, this will definitely change the dynamic of future flying on Alaska Airlines.
Elites are now expected to pay additional $900+ ($30 X 30 transcon) to feel the current level of Alaska love (75K).
Who knows what the additional fees are going to be in 2020 and beyond.

For many, time has now come to decide your allegiance. To pay "up charge" and fly Alaska, or become free agent.

Jiburi
jiburi is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 10:49 am
  #407  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Originally Posted by jsguyrus
So on west coast flights that were $69 (SEA-SFO) its now $99, so a nice 30% fare increase. Not thrilled.
The increase is actually 43.5% (30÷69)

James
notquiteaff likes this.
Flying for Fun is online now  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 11:19 am
  #408  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,598
Originally Posted by jiburi
Seriously, with this basic economy disguised as a small poison for elite level travelers, this will definitely change the dynamic of future flying on Alaska Airlines.
Elites are now expected to pay additional $900+ ($30 X 30 transcon) to feel the current level of Alaska love (75K).
Who knows what the additional fees are going to be in 2020 and beyond.
It's sort of a variation on including an EQD based element in the program - instead of making you buy more expensive tickets to qualify, you have to buy more expensive tickets to get all the benefits after you qualify. And you still get more benefits than over at UA. If they don't go and add an EQD component like the US3, then it probably lets flyers off at less penalty than adding EQD would, and lets you qualify on cheap fares (it's still 500 mile minimum/segment, so throwaway saver fares on commuter flights can accumulate EQM relatively cheaply) and pick and choose whether you'd rather have the benefit or the $.
Flying for Fun likes this.
chrisl137 is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 1:49 pm
  #409  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: US West Coast
Programs: Alaska 100K, Hyatt Gl, Marriott Ti/LTP
Posts: 353
Sorry to re-post something I posted on a different thread, but I feel it's worth pointing out in here, too.

The period of a uniform $30 buy-up is definitely over, and it only lasted a few weeks. Here's an evening in March 2019: $30, $20, $10, or no Saver, depending on the flight. I don't know if these are being set based on other carriers' schedules, or if it happens automatically, based on available underlying fare class.
For the curious, here are the costs to buy out of Saver:
$99: L (+ $30 or ~18%)
$211: H (so no Saver would be expected here, but + $0 or 0%)
$114: G (+ $20 or ~21%)
$124: K (+ $10 or ~9%)

I don't mean to be pollyannaish about this. I am deeply unhappy about these Saver fares. But claims that they're a 50% price hike are just not accurate.
jinglish likes this.
CalanMan is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 2:13 pm
  #410  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Berkeley, CA
Programs: UA Silver, Southwest A-List, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 818
Originally Posted by CalanMan
The period of a uniform $30 buy-up is definitely over, and it only lasted a few weeks.
Agreed. Seeing +$15 for the buy-up on SFO-LAX fares, which is more reasonable than $30. I'm still a bit miffed that they wouldn't scale it at least on the intra-CA flights on the initial roll out, but I guess it is better to start high and go down than do the reverse.
I would really love to see how the volume of bookings on short-haul flights have changed since the X rollout and for the BF/Cyber-Monday sale compared to last year for comparisons sake.
FlyingBear is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 2:22 pm
  #411  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10,904
Originally Posted by CalanMan
I don't mean to be pollyannaish about this. I am deeply unhappy about these Saver fares. But claims that they're a 50% price hike are just not accurate.
It was true. It's only within the last week that the buy-ups have been modified.

Last week there were, for example, SFO-LAX flights were saver was $49 and main was $79. Now they have come down to saver $49, main $64. That's still a 30% price hike

I even see an LAX-LAS flight that's $51 for saver and $81 for Main (59% -- AS 1490 on 1/25)

It took me only a couple of seconds to find this -- I just did a search on some random dates. I'm sure that if you take some times you can find more. I don't think that they are rare cases.

So, while it's not a 50% hike across the board, it is a very steep price hike, sometimes even exceeding 50%, particularly on short routes.
VegasGambler is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 3:04 pm
  #412  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: US West Coast
Programs: Alaska 100K, Hyatt Gl, Marriott Ti/LTP
Posts: 353
Originally Posted by FlyingBear
I would really love to see how the volume of bookings on short-haul flights have changed since the X rollout and for the BF/Cyber-Monday sale compared to last year for comparisons sake.
Yeah, in my mind, it's super unfortunate that the $30 buy-up period basically hosed the Black Friday sale this year. Maybe that was their intent?

There were definitely some tickets that I would have purchased for the $10 markup, but $30 was just too much. Southwest seems to be getting a fair chunk of my late-winter/early-spring travel in 2019, which totally bums me out.
CalanMan is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 3:38 pm
  #413  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: Hilton/Marriott Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 2,036
Originally Posted by CalanMan
Yeah, in my mind, it's super unfortunate that the $30 buy-up period basically hosed the Black Friday sale this year. Maybe that was their intent?
Running a sale with the express purpose of having people not buy the things on sale? I think it's far more likely that they just started with $30 for all flights as a baseline and then realized how terrible of an idea that was after dismal Cyber Monday sales.
notquiteaff, CalanMan and DrAlex like this.
jinglish is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 3:46 pm
  #414  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Berkeley, CA
Programs: UA Silver, Southwest A-List, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 818
Originally Posted by jinglish
Running a sale with the express purpose of having people not buy the things on sale? I think it's far more likely that they just started with $30 for all flights as a baseline and then realized how terrible of an idea that was after dismal Cyber Monday sales.
My thoughts exactly. I don't have the data to back me up, but I feel like the implementation could have been better developed than a flat rollout. Of course, I'm not revenue management and will never know the full extent of the story in fairness to AS. I hope that if that was the case, they take some lessons learned though.
CalanMan likes this.
FlyingBear is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 3:52 pm
  #415  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: US West Coast
Programs: Alaska 100K, Hyatt Gl, Marriott Ti/LTP
Posts: 353
Originally Posted by jinglish
Running a sale with the express purpose of having people not buy the things on sale? I think it's far more likely that they just started with $30 for all flights as a baseline and then realized how terrible of an idea that was after dismal Cyber Monday sales.
Yes, also very much hoping that that's the case.

If I put on my tinfoil hat, "Running a sale with the express purpose of having people not buy the things [at the sale price]," does make a little bit more business sense.

But I like your conclusion better, so that's what I'm going to choose to believe.
CalanMan is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 4:17 pm
  #416  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS 75K, BW Plat, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 10,725
Originally Posted by jinglish
Running a sale with the express purpose of having people not buy the things on sale? I think it's far more likely that they just started with $30 for all flights as a baseline and then realized how terrible of an idea that was after dismal Cyber Monday sales.
I agree...I think the Cyber Monday sale, which use to be a pretty big deal, was largely ignored this year.
PDXPremier is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 4:18 pm
  #417  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Originally Posted by jiburi
Elites are now expected to pay additional $900+ ($30 X 30 transcon) to feel the current level of Alaska love (75K).
Might even be more than that if you factor Hawaii travel which is about the same distance as transcon for those of us on the west coast. Some of those are an additional $45 each way.

The primary reason I'm with Alaska is miles. Start tampering with those and I can live off my lifetime AA or UA status. I rarely make flight changes and if I can find a window seat I might be a likely candidate to at least give basic economy a try.

Tom in Nuremberg tonight
tom911 is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 9:16 pm
  #418  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,065
Originally Posted by jiburi
Seriously, with this basic economy disguised as a small poison for elite level travelers, this will definitely change the dynamic of future flying on Alaska Airlines.
Elites are now expected to pay additional $900+ ($30 X 30 transcon) to feel the current level of Alaska love (75K).
Who knows what the additional fees are going to be in 2020 and beyond.

For many, time has now come to decide your allegiance. To pay "up charge" and fly Alaska, or become free agent.

Jiburi
The vast majority of flyers doing 30 transcons a year are likely business flyers who aren't paying for their flights and don't really care what it costs. I suspect a big part of the reason Basic Economy fares have succeeded is that many corporate purchasing departments are now excluding them -- much to the delight of the airlines.
Flying for Fun likes this.
xliioper is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 10:08 pm
  #419  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,373
Originally Posted by LBJ
The vast majority of flyers doing 30 transcons a year are likely business flyers who aren't paying for their flights and don't really care what it costs. I suspect a big part of the reason Basic Economy fares have succeeded is that many corporate purchasing departments are now excluding them -- much to the delight of the airlines.

the individuals may not particularly care, but their travel accounting departments most likely do ... in my case, Concur flags anything beyond $25 over “lowest logical fare” (but luckily — so far — doesn’t return Basic Economy options in flight searches)
jrl767 is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2018, 10:18 pm
  #420  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,856
Originally Posted by jrl767

the individuals may not particularly care, but their travel accounting departments most likely do ...
Exactly. I doubt that large corporate travel buyers are just eating a 20-40% surcharge... or able to. Presumably if they are large enough, they will negotiate some deal with their preferred airlines.
notquiteaff is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.