Community
Wiki Posts
Search

EU 261 implications of abandoning connection at CDG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2025 | 11:25 am
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GLA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 3,226
EU 261 implications of abandoning connection at CDG?

Hello - I'm asking for some advice from AF regulars, please.

I have a one way trip soon FRA-CDG-CFE. It is a short connection (1h10). I am relaxed about this - it's all terminal 2G, I'll have no checked bags, etc. But if it doesn't work, I'd rather have thought about my options in advance.

If I miss the connection, there's not another flight for another 9-10 hours, so unless the first flight is very late, I think my preference would be to make my own way to Clermont-Ferrand by train.

My question is (assuming that the cause of the delay is attributable to AF and that EU 261 compensation applies), would simply abandoning the journey at CDG and buying a train ticket affect my eligibility for EU 261 delayed arrival compensation? Is there anything I would need to do or say to AF before doing so in order to protect my position? And - even better - would AF offer a re-route on SNCF?

Merci tous!
Scots_Al is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2025 | 11:51 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold; LH Senator
Posts: 30,532
Yes, there will definitely be implications if you do not engage with them and unilaterally rebook yourself, you will not be eligible for late arrival compensation.

The argument that they wouldn't have got you to your destination is irrelevant- you didn't even consider what their rebooking option would be.
Scots_Al, orbitmic and DiamondMile like this.
irishguy28 is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2025 | 3:28 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Ultimate/Platinum for life/Club2000, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 24,956
Originally Posted by Scots_Al
And - even better - would AF offer a re-route on SNCF?
They won't.
Scots_Al and orbitmic like this.
Goldorak is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2025 | 3:31 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GLA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 3,226
Originally Posted by irishguy28
Yes, there will definitely be implications if you do not engage with them and unilaterally rebook yourself, you will not be eligible for late arrival compensation.

The argument that they wouldn't have got you to your destination is irrelevant- you didn't even consider what their rebooking option would be.
Thanks - yes, fair point - though presumably once their offer has been, there would be no harm in declining it and making own arrangements?
Scots_Al is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2025 | 3:31 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GLA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 3,226
Originally Posted by Goldorak
They won't.
Ah well, thank you for confirming.
estrela likes this.
Scots_Al is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2025 | 4:57 pm
  #6  
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Programs: DYKWIA
Posts: 523
With your trip starting in Germany you should be able to get some compensation and a good lawyer.
estrela is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 8:11 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 11,190
If you miss your connection at CDG, you can instead of Re-routing take advantage of your right to Reimbursement of the part of the journey not made. You will simply say to the staff that the journey no longer serves the purpose in relation to the original travel plan, per Article 8 Paragraph 1(a). You will request reimbursement for the part of the journey not made and make your own arrangement.
This will make collecting compensation more difficult though, so you might take that into account when making the decision.
Scots_Al likes this.
Fabo.sk is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 8:39 am
  #8  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GLA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 3,226
Originally Posted by Fabo.sk
If you miss your connection at CDG, you can instead of Re-routing take advantage of your right to Reimbursement of the part of the journey not made. You will simply say to the staff that the journey no longer serves the purpose in relation to the original travel plan, per Article 8 Paragraph 1(a). You will request reimbursement for the part of the journey not made and make your own arrangement.
This will make collecting compensation more difficult though, so you might take that into account when making the decision.
Makes sense, thanks. In this hypothetical instance the compensation would be worth more than the reimbursable amount - but not so much more that sitting at CDG for 9 hours would be preferable to getting the RER to Bercy and jumping on a train.
Scots_Al is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 8:57 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 11,190
I was thinking especially in relation to the reason for the delay. If you are delayed from FRA for reasons of weather for example, you are not getting compensated no matter what, so there's no point in even considering it. If the plane broke down in FRA, and took 5 hours to fix, on the other hand, might be worth staying the extra 4 hours in CDG to get the 250.
Scots_Al, the810 and DiamondMile like this.
Fabo.sk is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 9:30 am
  #10  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GLA
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 3,226
Originally Posted by Fabo.sk
I was thinking especially in relation to the reason for the delay. If you are delayed from FRA for reasons of weather for example, you are not getting compensated no matter what, so there's no point in even considering it. If the plane broke down in FRA, and took 5 hours to fix, on the other hand, might be worth staying the extra 4 hours in CDG to get the 250.
Oh definitely in that case. Thank you for helping bring some clarity to my thoughts - all of which is hopefully nothing more than a hypothetical consideration. But I am a fan of contingency planning - or at least of not making bad decisions under "pressure".
Scots_Al is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 9:36 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist and Ambassador: The British Airways Club
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Diam, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 33,116
As noted by others, its always better to discuss with the airline. Choosing to unilaterally curtail the trip and assuming you would have been sufficiently late for compensation makes you far more vulnerable. Once you discuss wit them and they highlight the options you can consider the alternatives including journey in vain, but if you choose to voluntarily transform your fra-cfe into fra-cdg, assuming that the delay to cdg is under the compensation threshold, you cant expect them to pay easily based on hypotheticals. Things could be slightly different if your flight is cancelled rather than delayed.
Scots_Al likes this.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 12:27 pm
  #12  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Programs: BD Gold, BAEC Gold, Hilton HHonors, IHG, Flying Blue Platinum
Posts: 940
Always possible the reason for any delay into CDG also delays your onwards flight from CDG.... this worked in my favour at AMS a few months ago - I'd upgraded to J at check-in, I then saw a delay and missed connection approaching so proactively rebooked myself via platinum line, only to then be rebooked to my original (late) flight in economy, and KL staff at AMS rebooked into J. It would probably have been a lot less hassle had I let things run automatically in the background!

Happy travels 😎
Scots_Al likes this.
so3003 is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 1:28 pm
  #13  
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Programs: DYKWIA
Posts: 523
Originally Posted by Fabo.sk
I was thinking especially in relation to the reason for the delay. If you are delayed from FRA for reasons of weather for example, you are not getting compensated no matter what, so there's no point in even considering it. If the plane broke down in FRA, and took 5 hours to fix, on the other hand, might be worth staying the extra 4 hours in CDG to get the 250.
This is not correct. Bad weather is not a carte blanche to have the OP wait 9h for a short connection to CFE. If AF does not come up with the next available alternative there is compensation due, at least with point of departure in Germany.
estrela is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2025 | 2:52 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Ultimate/Platinum for life/Club2000, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 24,956
Originally Posted by estrela
This is not correct. Bad weather is not a carte blanche to have the OP wait 9h for a short connection to CFE. If AF does not come up with the next available alternative there is compensation due, at least with point of departure in Germany.
There is no other alternative. CFE is now very poorly served. Basically, only 3 daily flights from CDG and that's it.
Goldorak is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2025 | 11:41 am
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,619
Are there additional flights from Orly, perhaps on a different airline (LCC/ULCC)?
Scots_Al likes this.
MSPeconomist is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.