Phase-out of Air France entire Airbus A380 fleet
#16
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Anglia UK
Programs: BA-S UA LH-Sen KLM/AF-Plat.
Posts: 1,627
Am I the only living soul who actually likes/d the old style 380P cabin? Flying during the day with an empty or nearly empty cabin it seemed sort of like one's "own living room". Loads of space, exceptional service, quiet and comfortable. But then I suppose the fact that the cabin was often less then half full at most was its own demise to some extent. Flying on a 777, yes the cabin was new, the seat was slightly better and the curtains were very nice for privacy but it was noisier and I found it claustrophobic. I dislike the enclosed suites so often seen in many F cabins.
#17
Join Date: Apr 2005
Programs: Eurostar Carte Blanche, SBB-CFF-FFS GA-AG, SNCF Grand Voyageur LeClub
Posts: 7,836
But indeed, the Premiere product may be a collateral damage of the A380 retirement. How many A380s did AF still fly before the lockdown? Ten? So retiring them now will withdraw 90 P seats from the AF fleet. Not all of them were needed, they often did not manage to sell all nine P seats. But let's say they still want to bring sufficient P capacity to at least some of the A380 desintations: JFK, LAX, PVG, JNB, MEX, SFO (note that some of them weren't going to see the A380 anymore anyway), so that P capacity would need to come from the 77W fleet. There aren't enough 77Ws with P to cover all of that, so AF would need to reconfigure some planes. The plan of having planes with 8 P seats becomes relevant, these could be used on some routes (but not all that saw A380 with 9 P seats previously). But then, does AF have the money to finance that reconfiguration?
Lots of unknowns, let's hope P stays with us and that it will be widely available.
#19
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Paris, France
Programs: FB Platinum for Life
Posts: 367
The A380 first cabin has been in my experience usually quite full on AF6 CDG JFK. The night flight AF7 JFK CDG is less appealing for obvious reasons although the service remains as superb as always. I do rather wonder though if AF will fit future A350 cabins with the new improved first given that at present the A350/787 fleet are limited to Business/Premium Eco/Eco. It would be a pity to see it go.
#20
Join Date: Apr 2005
Programs: Eurostar Carte Blanche, SBB-CFF-FFS GA-AG, SNCF Grand Voyageur LeClub
Posts: 7,836
The A380 first cabin has been in my experience usually quite full on AF6 CDG JFK. The night flight AF7 JFK CDG is less appealing for obvious reasons although the service remains as superb as always. I do rather wonder though if AF will fit future A350 cabins with the new improved first given that at present the A350/787 fleet are limited to Business/Premium Eco/Eco. It would be a pity to see it go.
#22
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Franche Comté, FR, Atlanta, USA
Programs: DL DM-2MM, BA Gold, A3 Gold, AF Plat
Posts: 408
#23
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: DFW
Posts: 131
Sorry to see the a380 go, but would LOVE to see La Première seats on other planes if only to increase P capacity and keep it from being phased out.
If we could get a row of La Première seats on the DFW-CDG non-stop, I would leave AA for AF in a heartbeat. Plus, AF allows paid upgrades at the gate while AA requires what, a blood sacrifice? A special rain dance?
If we could get a row of La Première seats on the DFW-CDG non-stop, I would leave AA for AF in a heartbeat. Plus, AF allows paid upgrades at the gate while AA requires what, a blood sacrifice? A special rain dance?
#24
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAS/FCO/JFK/LAX
Programs: DL DM/2MM, BA GGL/CCR,/GFL, A3 Gold, JBU Mosaic, ITA Executive, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 305
i know it sounds strange, but on the 777 P I arrive less rested than on the 380 P. I say this after approximately 20 roundtrips in the 380 and some 15 in the 777
In the 380, I like the openness of the cabin and the size of the ottoman more. If they had been OK’d to mount curtains on the 388 it would have been superior, although obviously a bit less exclusive. As for the IFE, in the era of downloadable netflix it doesnt change much
In the 380, I like the openness of the cabin and the size of the ottoman more. If they had been OK’d to mount curtains on the 388 it would have been superior, although obviously a bit less exclusive. As for the IFE, in the era of downloadable netflix it doesnt change much
#27
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAS/FCO/JFK/LAX
Programs: DL DM/2MM, BA GGL/CCR,/GFL, A3 Gold, JBU Mosaic, ITA Executive, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 305
Where are all the people that have wished for the A380 to leave the fleet because of its dated cabins, especially in J and P?
I won't miss it. I personally don't understand the "flight experience" argument. What makes the most difference is the seat. I rather have the new J seat on a B777 than the old one on the A380. And the P cabin is clearly inferior.
I won't miss it. I personally don't understand the "flight experience" argument. What makes the most difference is the seat. I rather have the new J seat on a B777 than the old one on the A380. And the P cabin is clearly inferior.
In the 380, I like the openness of the cabin and the size of the ottoman more. If they had been OK’d to mount curtains on the 388 it would have been superior, although obviously a bit less exclusive. As for the IFE, in the era of downloadable netflix it doesnt change much
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Platinum for life/Club2000 Ultimate, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 21,927
It will require a lot of rain dance to have AF P on DTW-CDG . The 1st challenge for AF will be to survive on this route who has always been very difficult for all non-OW carriers.
#29
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: Flying Blue Platinum / Marriott Gold / Hilton Gold / IHG Platinum ... A former AA Platinum
Posts: 106
Where are all the people that have wished for the A380 to leave the fleet because of its dated cabins, especially in J and P?
I won't miss it. I personally don't understand the "flight experience" argument. What makes the most difference is the seat. I rather have the new J seat on a B777 than the old one on the A380. And the P cabin is clearly inferior.
I won't miss it. I personally don't understand the "flight experience" argument. What makes the most difference is the seat. I rather have the new J seat on a B777 than the old one on the A380. And the P cabin is clearly inferior.
Here! Happy to see it leave the fleet. My beef did indeed include the terrible interior fittings - but these could have been improved on. My main problem with this bird was always the length and convolution of accessing the aircraft. In most airport (JFK being my home airport), they weren't designed for 500 passagers waiting in line and it was just madness. At CDG, the bleeping purpose built gates at M48-50 were so far away from everything else, I always thought we were in Belgium by the time you got there. In fact, landing there was the worst after a long flight ... The enddddddlesss hallways to get back to the luggage area.
I really will not miss you, A380
#30
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 216
Here! Happy to see it leave the fleet. My beef did indeed include the terrible interior fittings - but these could have been improved on. My main problem with this bird was always the length and convolution of accessing the aircraft. In most airport (JFK being my home airport), they weren't designed for 500 passagers waiting in line and it was just madness. At CDG, the bleeping purpose built gates at M48-50 were so far away from everything else, I always thought we were in Belgium by the time you got there. In fact, landing there was the worst after a long flight ... The enddddddlesss hallways to get back to the luggage area.
I really will not miss you, A380
I really will not miss you, A380