Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Dancing Lessons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2001 | 7:50 pm
  #16  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 9,998
And the answer is...

Not PVR, probably.

PVR is several hundred dollars more than CUN from Ontario, and connections are a little more difficult.
Ken hAAmer is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2001 | 8:26 pm
  #17  
Original Member
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,779
Ken: Glad you have a *much* better time than me in LAX. I think my problems where three-fold. First, I had never been to LAX before and really had no idea where I was going in the terminals. Second, it was US spring break and most flights were packed. Third, I think I just generally had bad luck.

I'm still hoping to go on some sort of "mass MHD" in May sometime with fellow FlyerTalkers. I think I'll be much better prepared the second time!

[This message has been edited by Fisch (edited 04-17-2001).]
Fisch is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2001 | 12:08 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 528
Ken and others who habitually fly in Executive First or Executive Class cabins, are you aware:

There is a form in our possession called "Onboard Compensation". This form should be presented voluntarily by a flight crew member to compensate for the following.

Seat (an operation is not functional and the person cannot be moved); personal television unserviceable; audio or reading light unserviceable. These particular "offences" entitle you to a $100.00 travel voucher or 3,000 Aeroplan miles if this form is completed and submitted.

SPML (noted on manifest but not boarded); shortage of meals (a few exceptions listed) entitle you to a $50.00 travel voucher or 1,500 Aeroplan miles, again, if the form is completed and submitted.

The pledge is that the value of the compensation chosen will be provided within 20 days of your flight experience - voucher or credit, whichever you choose.

Are you people aware of this?
A Flygirl is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2001 | 12:39 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 9,998
HOLY COW!!!

Well, I am now. That's just too cool. Thanks for the info.
Ken hAAmer is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2001 | 2:01 am
  #20  
ALW
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 8,573
I think if Ken doesn't know, then A Flygirl must be the only employee using them!

On my recent A330 flight, two people in the row ahead had inoperable in-seat video (seat C and seat G I think, each to the left of an aisle anyway).

Both were given personal video players instead, but I didn't hear anything about an offer of compensation. (It may also explain why on the YOW-LHR flight we just watched the big screen and didn't have personal video -- AC taking them off the CP metal to use as backup on their own?).

andrew
ALW is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2001 | 12:13 pm
  #21  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: exUA1K, UA MM, lifetime UA1P, AA MM, HH Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,806
Please excuse my ignorance.

But what is MHD????

roberto99 is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2001 | 12:58 pm
  #22  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: YXU, ON Canada
Programs: AC LT E50K; AC*MM; SPG LT Gold
Posts: 4,672
It's dead. But when it wasn't, it was a way to avoid the high cost of transcon Canadian flights by taking a routing via MEX. It was cheaper to fly J e.g YOW-YVR-MEX and back than YOW-YVR in Y.
Academic is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.