How does UA expect to compete with 2-4-2 Business Class configurations for 777s?
#16
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: Hilton Diamond DL Platinum UA 1K, DL Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 500
actually if I could chose between the 2-3-2 or 2-4-2 planes it would be the 2-4-2 Hands Down!
Why simple 2-3-2 plane is 55x20.5 for the Biz seat, the 2-4-2 plane is 77x23.PLUS the 2-3-2 are recliner seats (old planes with 2-5-2 in Y) while the 2-4-2 are Lie-flats
so your question should be how does UA expect to sell the 2-3-2 Biz class when its not lie-flats, smaller seat and no AVOD like the 2-4-2 has. The 2-4-2 are the new configs with 3-3-3- in Y
Why simple 2-3-2 plane is 55x20.5 for the Biz seat, the 2-4-2 plane is 77x23.PLUS the 2-3-2 are recliner seats (old planes with 2-5-2 in Y) while the 2-4-2 are Lie-flats
so your question should be how does UA expect to sell the 2-3-2 Biz class when its not lie-flats, smaller seat and no AVOD like the 2-4-2 has. The 2-4-2 are the new configs with 3-3-3- in Y
I looked at the seatguru map and it shows the aisles don't line up which maybe I could see how they get the space.
I was using the UNITED map and the seats are lined up so I can't see where the space would come from.
Since this is a daytime flight and I am not interested in the lie flat, spaciousness is what is important to me and of course it is nice not to have to climb over people when you are paying for Business.
#19
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
Spacious -- potentially means different things to different people. Such as
-- seat width
-- seat length (as a bed)
-- foot well size
-- spacing between seats
-- ease of access to aisle
-- sense of personal space / privacy / visual line of sight
-- .... {and most probably have additional factors}
as has been discussed (numerous times) the sCO and sUA seats are different and neither is superior in all of the, for all the seats in business, ... There is no simple single answer for everyone.
-- seat width
-- seat length (as a bed)
-- foot well size
-- spacing between seats
-- ease of access to aisle
-- sense of personal space / privacy / visual line of sight
-- .... {and most probably have additional factors}
as has been discussed (numerous times) the sCO and sUA seats are different and neither is superior in all of the, for all the seats in business, ... There is no simple single answer for everyone.
#20
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Spacious -- potentially means different things to different people. Such as
-- seat width
-- seat length (as a bed)
-- foot well size
-- spacing between seats
-- ease of access to aisle
-- sense of personal space / privacy / visual line of sight
-- .... {and most probably have additional factors}
as has been discussed (numerous times) the sCO and sUA seats are different and neither is superior in all of the, for all the seats in business, ... There is no simple single answer for everyone.
-- seat width
-- seat length (as a bed)
-- foot well size
-- spacing between seats
-- ease of access to aisle
-- sense of personal space / privacy / visual line of sight
-- .... {and most probably have additional factors}
as has been discussed (numerous times) the sCO and sUA seats are different and neither is superior in all of the, for all the seats in business, ... There is no simple single answer for everyone.
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,205
If the OP thinks those 2-4-2 seats on the 777 are bad, just wait until they board that NRT SEA flight with the ancient 2-3-2 C cabin and the postage-stamp entertainment screens....they'll really be thrilled.
#23
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: United MileagePlus
Posts: 55
The IFE interface on the sCO planes (those with on-demand systems) is the original Continental Airlines system updated with new UNITED splash screens and logos.
And they're terrible.
I can't call up the air show AND listen to music at the same time, like how I can on the sUA interface? The navigation on those things are also time consuming and clunky.
Time for the airline to upgrade them to something much more user friendly.
As for sUA vs sCO BusinessFirst seats, the sCO's narrow foot wells are definitely a downside. The location of the headphone jack isn't ideal for me either, and the seat controls don't give you much of a choice on repositioning your leg rest to your desired spot. And the airbag attached the seat belt can be an impediment too.
The sUA seat gives you less storage space, and yes, having experienced the middle seats in the 2-4-2 configuration, it can be really awkward rubbing knees with the lady reclined in the seat next to you.
For me, service is more important than the seat. I only recently sat up front on a sCO International flight and I couldn't believe how badly the BF pax were spoiled by the flight attendants. I think the bread basket came by at least a dozen times during the meal service!
I had to check the ticket stub to make sure I was actually on United!
And they're terrible.
I can't call up the air show AND listen to music at the same time, like how I can on the sUA interface? The navigation on those things are also time consuming and clunky.
Time for the airline to upgrade them to something much more user friendly.
As for sUA vs sCO BusinessFirst seats, the sCO's narrow foot wells are definitely a downside. The location of the headphone jack isn't ideal for me either, and the seat controls don't give you much of a choice on repositioning your leg rest to your desired spot. And the airbag attached the seat belt can be an impediment too.
The sUA seat gives you less storage space, and yes, having experienced the middle seats in the 2-4-2 configuration, it can be really awkward rubbing knees with the lady reclined in the seat next to you.
For me, service is more important than the seat. I only recently sat up front on a sCO International flight and I couldn't believe how badly the BF pax were spoiled by the flight attendants. I think the bread basket came by at least a dozen times during the meal service!
I had to check the ticket stub to make sure I was actually on United!
#24
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: UA GS>1K>Nothing; DL DM 2MM; AS 75K>Nothing>MVP
Posts: 9,341
The PMUA 2-4-2 have more seat/bed space than
PMCO 2-2-2
NH staggered
DL Herringbone
AC
TG (new or old)
CX
While the seats look cramped and lack privacy, if you're tall or wide they give you more room and are more comfortable than just about any other biz seat out there.
PMCO 2-2-2
NH staggered
DL Herringbone
AC
TG (new or old)
CX
While the seats look cramped and lack privacy, if you're tall or wide they give you more room and are more comfortable than just about any other biz seat out there.
#25
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: Hilton Diamond DL Platinum UA 1K, DL Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 500
The IFE interface on the sCO planes (those with on-demand systems) is the original Continental Airlines system updated with new UNITED splash screens and logos.
And they're terrible.
I can't call up the air show AND listen to music at the same time, like how I can on the sUA interface? The navigation on those things are also time consuming and clunky.
Time for the airline to upgrade them to something much more user friendly.
As for sUA vs sCO BusinessFirst seats, the sCO's narrow foot wells are definitely a downside. The location of the headphone jack isn't ideal for me either, and the seat controls don't give you much of a choice on repositioning your leg rest to your desired spot. And the airbag attached the seat belt can be an impediment too.
The sUA seat gives you less storage space, and yes, having experienced the middle seats in the 2-4-2 configuration, it can be really awkward rubbing knees with the lady reclined in the seat next to you.
For me, service is more important than the seat. I only recently sat up front on a sCO International flight and I couldn't believe how badly the BF pax were spoiled by the flight attendants. I think the bread basket came by at least a dozen times during the meal service!
I had to check the ticket stub to make sure I was actually on United!
And they're terrible.
I can't call up the air show AND listen to music at the same time, like how I can on the sUA interface? The navigation on those things are also time consuming and clunky.
Time for the airline to upgrade them to something much more user friendly.
As for sUA vs sCO BusinessFirst seats, the sCO's narrow foot wells are definitely a downside. The location of the headphone jack isn't ideal for me either, and the seat controls don't give you much of a choice on repositioning your leg rest to your desired spot. And the airbag attached the seat belt can be an impediment too.
The sUA seat gives you less storage space, and yes, having experienced the middle seats in the 2-4-2 configuration, it can be really awkward rubbing knees with the lady reclined in the seat next to you.
For me, service is more important than the seat. I only recently sat up front on a sCO International flight and I couldn't believe how badly the BF pax were spoiled by the flight attendants. I think the bread basket came by at least a dozen times during the meal service!
I had to check the ticket stub to make sure I was actually on United!
Glad to hear you had some good service in Business. My last trip unfortunately I was in Economy and we never saw an FA for hours on end and if you rang the bell for something to drink , you got a dirty scowl.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
The PMUA 2-4-2 isn't that bad. Its less private, but unless you're in F, or on a private plane, you're going to exist with other people. Being in the middle of the 4 is the same as being in a window, inconvenience wise.
The PMUA seats are more comfortable to me than the CO ones, and the IFE is much better.
The PMUA seats are more comfortable to me than the CO ones, and the IFE is much better.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G, AA Emerald, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 10,276
NH flies 763 for BKK-NRT, even though it is 2-1-2 config in C, but the seat is horrible, and there is not much to see with the PTV (unless you are Japanese, as there are tons of Japanese programs, but it doesn't even have any English subtitles)
#28
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: Lifetime UA 1K, Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 1,261
I guess it is all relative. For me the 2-4-2 lie-flat seats are wonderful compared to coach. 15 hours in coach is a HORRIBLE experience (especially if you do it a lot) where 15 hours in these business seats is a pleasure.
I agree it would be nice if they were wider and more-private, especially for the $10-20K they charge.
I agree it would be nice if they were wider and more-private, especially for the $10-20K they charge.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
#30
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Houston
Programs: UA - 1K, Marriott - Gold, Hilton - Gold, Global Entry,
Posts: 633
I guess it is all relative. For me the 2-4-2 lie-flat seats are wonderful compared to coach. 15 hours in coach is a HORRIBLE experience (especially if you do it a lot) where 15 hours in these business seats is a pleasure.
I agree it would be nice if they were wider and more-private, especially for the $10-20K they charge.
I agree it would be nice if they were wider and more-private, especially for the $10-20K they charge.