Why do LCC's give so little food that is PAID for by the passengers.
#16
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,918
They already do. However, different people have different utility functions and most passengers will choose the option that saves them 2 USD on a TATL even if they rant for 1-2 days after each of those flights. This race to the bottom is not exactly new and it would have long reverted back to the old model if most passengers did not value it.
Value is seeing that adding 2 pieces of luggage will cost an additional $70 to get them onboard... But for a legacy airline... $80 will get you the luggage and a more comfortable seat... Better value proposition...
#17
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,918
And some of their utility functions are strange. It seems that people are willing to pay more for unhealthy food to carry on board than pay somewhat less more for their ticket and be given somewhat less unhealthy food onboard. At least that's the lesson we get from BA's removal of complimentary onboard drinks and food.
If people go into the flight with the expectation of I am just using this like a bus to get from A to B, they would be much happier. But more often than not, they are expecting the costs to go down, but for them to maintain a concept that came out of the 40s and 50s where you were served lobster and caviar... But they are getting a burger and fries.
That's why they gripe...
#18
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,188
I think you misunderstand. That's still basing it on price.
Value is seeing that adding 2 pieces of luggage will cost an additional $70 to get them onboard... But for a legacy airline... $80 will get you the luggage and a more comfortable seat... Better value proposition...
Value is seeing that adding 2 pieces of luggage will cost an additional $70 to get them onboard... But for a legacy airline... $80 will get you the luggage and a more comfortable seat... Better value proposition...
#19
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,808
I was looking at Norwegian and Level's long haul food and it looked like a fraction of what you would usually in full service airlines' COMPLIMENTARY meals.
Or is it actually more filling than it looks?
If not, I hope this is not the future of airline meals as budget long haul flights become more prevalent.
Or is it actually more filling than it looks?
If not, I hope this is not the future of airline meals as budget long haul flights become more prevalent.
Buy cheap, get cheap.
#20
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
Is this the same question as in OP's other thread: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...amenities.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/briti...ging-food.html
And another...
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/other...rth-price.html
I suspect the answer is the same in all four threads - lower costs, preserve/improve margins.
#21
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Boston
Posts: 148
Believe it or not, I actually LIKE airplane food. I'd say it definitely beats Dunkin Donuts and Starbucks
#22
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,918
I will say this much... Fast food burgers from any of the chains never do well 3 hours into a flight...
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Programs: No programs & No Points!!!
Posts: 14,222
I was looking at Norwegian and Level's long haul food and it looked like a fraction of what you would usually in full service airlines' COMPLIMENTARY meals.
Or is it actually more filling than it looks?
If not, I hope this is not the future of airline meals as budget long haul flights become more prevalent.
Or is it actually more filling than it looks?
If not, I hope this is not the future of airline meals as budget long haul flights become more prevalent.
If you're paying less for an airfare of course the food will be different.
#24
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
..If people go into the flight with the expectation of I am just using this like a bus to get from A to B, they would be much happier. But more often than not, they are expecting the costs to go down, but for them to maintain a concept that came out of the 40s and 50s where you were served lobster and caviar... But they are getting a burger and fries.
#25
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,918
That sounds outlandishly construed. None of us have been around then. Just 12 years ago offerings were much better and prices were much lower. People didn't forget that they paid thousands of dollars for a domestic flight during WWII ... they recall the $200 flight to Europe that included free luggage, booze, hot food, and a normal size seat.
Yes, it's marketing spiel, but it's not what was being presented. Even the BoB stuff often does not look like what is shown in the brochures. It's closer. But not quite and often at inflated prices.
I'd rather buy something from the airport (or even better/possible, before the airport). I'm not saying the food is inedible, but you're not getting what you were sold as it were.
#26
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
I almost never see food in airline marketing/advertising. If I see it at all, it's long-haul J/F and I would hope that it's at least *somewhat* realistic...as much as any restaurant ad is anyway.
I would hope Norwegian isn't building ad campaigns around their food, which from reading here and elsewhere is apparently quite crappy.
I would hope Norwegian isn't building ad campaigns around their food, which from reading here and elsewhere is apparently quite crappy.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,803
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,803
Not these days but in the past. Even in the '80s, AS prided itself on its food offerings.
Not only that but hideously expensive too? I'm complaining about the price of D7's meals ex. Japan (~USD 14-15) and was informed that Norwegian charges 3x as much.
I would hope Norwegian isn't building ad campaigns around their food, which from reading here and elsewhere is apparently quite crappy.
#29
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
Modestly successful through the 90's by flying niche routes without competition. ex-MCI, they were at various points our only SEA, SAT, SNA, BOS, and MKE options - and those are just the routes I remember because I flew them. Seats and service on par with a major carrier's narrowbody F throughout the cabin, with a price that generally felt like "medium-to-high Y" (in an era when discounted F was rare).
Post-9/11, they struggled. They tried jumping into competitive/leisure markets with traditional Y seating and service. Eventually they were swallowed by Frontier and none of the routes I remember so fondly are still operated by them (except maybe MKE?).