St. Jude patient in bloody takedown at checkpoint
Sep 30, 2016, 2:46 pm
#301
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
2016-09-28 43 MSCAA Reply to 41 re MJP 22
Oct 9, 2016, 1:43 pm
#302
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
- 2016-09-30 44 TSA Opposition to Sai motion to intervene 30
- 2016-10-04 45 MSCAA & MIAPD Notice of adoption of TSA's opposition 44 to Sai motion to intervene
- 2016-10-06 46 TSA Reply re TSA motion to dismiss 28
Oct 11, 2016, 7:56 am
#303
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,507
I particularly enjoy the explanation of and reference to the "legal entity known as 'Sai'."
One can just about see the frustration and annoyance dripping from the AUSA's words...! Good show!
One can just about see the frustration and annoyance dripping from the AUSA's words...! Good show!
Oct 11, 2016, 10:31 pm
#304
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
On the other hand, they also made an attempt to use gender-neutral pronouns. ^ That could be some sort of insinuation of "this person's a weirdo", especially in the South, or it could be a genuine attempt to show respect. I'm choosing to try to believe the latter.
On the gripping hand, they did so with capital They, and I'm not a god, as I pointed out in the footnote at the end of my reply.
(My reply is in the mail, not on the docket yet, since the court, by default, doesn't allow pro se CM/ECF access. I could post the digital original, but I like having the CM/ECF headers.)
I dunno. I haven't had any interaction with this AUSA other than a couple emails about service and asking whether they opposed me having leave to file a reply (they didn't). So, who knows.
But it gave me the idea to start adding a sentence about my preferred pronouns in the footnote I give on initial papers to say that Sai is my full legal name (to avoid confusion). I figure that's a positive. And I did get MSCAA to un-redact the filing.
Oct 22, 2016, 10:48 am
#306
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
2016-10-21 47 Sai Reply re motion to interfene and unopposed motion for leave to file same
Oct 24, 2016, 7:18 am
#307
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Also, per Memphis Airport's general counsel: "You got whatever video that exists to the best of our knowledge."
So, this is probably all the video that's going to be available. I'll still follow up w/ TSA of course (who've not responded to my FOIA or the lawsuit), but I don't expect anything further.
So, this is probably all the video that's going to be available. I'll still follow up w/ TSA of course (who've not responded to my FOIA or the lawsuit), but I don't expect anything further.
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/Tra...t.pdf?method=1
Timeliness also is an issue for TSA; failure to respond has been a factor in nine of the 10 FOIA lawsuits filed against TSA since 2009, costing the agency $238,020 in litigation
Oct 24, 2016, 11:38 am
#308
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Sai, if you've not seen this, I thought you might get a kick out of it:
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/Tra...t.pdf?method=1
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/Tra...t.pdf?method=1
Oct 24, 2016, 2:24 pm
#309
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
Sai, if you've not seen this, I thought you might get a kick out of it:
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/Tra...t.pdf?method=1
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/Tra...t.pdf?method=1
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/TSA...e.pdf?method=1
I'm using both documents as evidence in my FOIA lawsuit cross-motion for summary judgment. (Due in a couple weeks.)
Oct 24, 2016, 2:55 pm
#310
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Oh, I've definitely seen it. And the followup / response:
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/TSA...e.pdf?method=1
I'm using both documents as evidence in my FOIA lawsuit cross-motion for summary judgment. (Due in a couple weeks.)
https://ogis.archives.gov/Assets/TSA...e.pdf?method=1
I'm using both documents as evidence in my FOIA lawsuit cross-motion for summary judgment. (Due in a couple weeks.)
^