Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Stolen baggage claim denied - BA Gold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:10 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold; FB Silver; SPG; IHG Gold
Posts: 2,985
Originally Posted by Ldnn1
Agree that this is not a matter for BA but one for the police and Heathrow.

The police really should be inspecting the CCTV (which should certainly exist) of the theft and trying to identify the culprits and ultimately bring charges. However the likelihood of recovering anything from them is negligible.

As others have said travel insurance - if you have it - is your best recourse here.
With all the security and cctv at LHR it should be well within the Police's capability to have a good go at identifying the scumbags responsible for this. Have they said anything at all about how their investigation is progressing? Whilst the English media may currently be up in arms at perceived Police inaction in respect of crimes such as theft and burglary, I would have thought that theft of or from baggage at our number 1 airport would be an absolute policing priority.

Last edited by South London Bon Viveur; Aug 3, 2015 at 6:34 am
South London Bon Viveur is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:12 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: BA214
Programs: Gold Mega Legend
Posts: 392
Originally Posted by NFH
A large amount of the blame here lies with the UK Border Force, who unreasonably compromise the security of passengers' baggage by delaying passengers at immigration controls. The UK Border Agency needs to have stricter standards whereby passengers are not normally prevented from reaching the baggage reclaim carousel before their baggage does.

I would raise a complaint with UK Border Force, just to make a point, although it's unlikely to get anywhere.
They will say, quite rightly, that the risk of compromising passenger baggage is far outweighed by compromising the UK border by not making thorough checks on incoming visitors.

Originally Posted by Southlondonbonviveur
Whilst the English media may currenlty be up in arms at perceived Police inaction in respect of crimes such as theft and burglary, I would have thought that theft of or from baggage at our number 1 airport would be an absolute policing priority.
Stopping potential Jihadis going to join IS may be a higher priority for Heathrow Police given the current climate.
revan is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:15 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: scotland/EDI
Programs: BAEC , M&M , VIRGIN FC , FLYING BLUE
Posts: 1,438
it rather annoys me when I read statements from people who immediately say one should claim on your travel insurance

the responsibility lies with HAL----the bag was in their care when it was stolen--so your claim should be against them

questions you may want to ask them is where was the bag found and why did it take 4 days for it to be found---seems very lax to me
jacobitetraveller is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:18 am
  #19  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
OP's status has nothing to do with his status. BA's job is to deliver the bag to the carousel and that it did. I'm not even sure why OP would file a claim with BA at all. OP's bag was stolen, that is a matter covered by his luggage insurance or for which he has chosen to assume the risk.

Neither UA nor any other carrier is going to treat him any differently. Nor should UA.

An interesting side note is that there are multiple rants on FT from people who have been stopped at the occasional LGA baggage checkpoint and asked to produce their claim.
Often1 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:19 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
Never quite understood the arrangements in US airports where the baggage reclaim in many domestic sides are outside of the secure are, so anyone can walk in an take baggage.

My father once was working out in the middle east when they stopped for lunch and had the bags stolen, apart from a battered, very old carpet bag. Which just happen to be the one filled with that weeks payroll for a remote site...

I always leave my bag unlocked as a signal there is nothing valuable in there, and I have travel insurance.
Worcester is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:21 am
  #21  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by jacobitetraveller
it rather annoys me when I read statements from people who immediately say one should claim on your travel insurance

the responsibility lies with HAL----the bag was in their care when it was stolen--so your claim should be against them

questions you may want to ask them is where was the bag found and why did it take 4 days for it to be found---seems very lax to me
I disagree that the bag was within HAL's care, as in "duty of care". Not everything that goes wrong in life is somebody else's fault to the extent that the somebody else is liable.
Often1 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:26 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: scotland/EDI
Programs: BAEC , M&M , VIRGIN FC , FLYING BLUE
Posts: 1,438
Originally Posted by Often1
I disagree that the bag was within HAL's care, as in "duty of care". Not everything that goes wrong in life is somebody else's fault to the extent that the somebody else is liable.
please explain why the bag was not in the care of HAL and they do not have a duty of care
jacobitetraveller is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:33 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by jacobitetraveller
it rather annoys me when I read statements from people who immediately say one should claim on your travel insurance
This is why you pay your insurance premium. It covers these risks. The insurance company will engage with other parties as they need to. So why shouldn't the traveller turn to their insurer?

Originally Posted by jacobitetraveller
the responsibility lies with HAL----the bag was in their care when it was stolen--so your claim should be against them
Does it? That's not what HAL says.

http://www.heathrow.com/arrivals/baggage-reclaim

"Baggage handling and delivery is your airline’s responsibility from check-in to collection"

Plus the customer's contractual relationship is with BA not HAL.

Originally Posted by jacobitetraveller
questions you may want to ask them is where was the bag found and why did it take 4 days for it to be found---seems very lax to me
Without knowing where the bag was in the intervening period I am not sure how you can exercise that judgement. It may have been removed from the premises for a couple of days before being returned and dumped there.
simons1 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:35 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by jacobitetraveller
please explain why the bag was not in the care of HAL and they do not have a duty of care
HAL do not at any stage have any responsibility for the bag. That is between BA and its baggage handling agents from the beginning to end of the process.
simons1 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:42 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GfL, Marriott PlatfL/Ambassador, TP Gold, IHG Spire
Posts: 1,656
From BA's own Conditions of Carriage:

8k) Collecting and delivering baggage checked into the hold
(...)

8k2) Only the person with the baggage identification tag and if one has been issued, the baggage check, can claim a piece of checked baggage.

8k3) If a person claiming a piece of checked baggage cannot produce the baggage identification tag and if one has been issued, the baggage check, we will deliver the baggage to them only if they can prove to us that the baggage is theirs.
BA says that only the person with the baggage tag can claim the bag - they failed to comply with their own CoC as they let someone else take the bag.

BA is responsible, simples.
mario is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:45 am
  #26  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,127
I am sorry to read that the OP had his bag stolen. It has always made me feel quite wary when there is a big queue at immigration for that very reason. It never seemed very secure to me.

There are all sorts of solutions and semi-solutions that I can think of (e.g. access to the particular carousel when the baggage tag stub for the right flight is scanned) etc but that's no good for the OP right now.

Given the OP has had the police find the bag, albeit with a jacket missing, I do hope that the police has checked the CCTV. Maybe there is a criminal group operating to commit this kind of crime and they will hopefully catch who has done this.

As for the recourse, I think the best solution would be the travel insurance. If they believe HAL or BA have liability, then they may well pursue them. It will save the OP having to have the hassle of chasing up multiple parties with an uncertain outcome. Insurance companies can make our life easier - that's one of the things we are paying for. Use them, instead of taking on the case yourself, even if it's just to save time.

Meanwhile it may be worthwhile complaining to the immigration department. Obviously they are not responsible for the criminal act by someone but it may may well have made it (inadvertently) easier for crimes to be committed.

As a somewhat strange thought though, we always complain about slow baggage delivery. Here is one benefit of slow baggage delivery. It reduces the risk of theft because we are there despite a long immigration queue!
LTN Phobia is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:48 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,286
Originally Posted by simons1
This is why you pay your insurance premium. It covers these risks. The insurance company will engage with other parties as they need to. So why shouldn't the traveller turn to their insurer?
Well most travel insurance policies have a single item limit of around £500 so in this case there would be uninsured losses to consider.

The question I would be asking of BA is what reasonable steps did you take whilst my bag was in your custody to ensure it wasn't stolen and that it was delivered to me?

Clearly delivering to a baggage carousel where there is a good chance the passenger won't yet be present is an issue as there is effectively nothing to prevent the bag from being stolen or interfered with.
TabTraveller is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:53 am
  #28  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia

As a somewhat strange thought though, we always complain about slow baggage delivery. Here is one benefit of slow baggage delivery
That's what I was thinking. That's why I prefer arriving at luggage reclaim before the bags start coming off.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 6:55 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GfL, Marriott PlatfL/Ambassador, TP Gold, IHG Spire
Posts: 1,656
Originally Posted by TabTraveller
Well most travel insurance policies have a single item limit of around £500 so in this case there would be uninsured losses to consider.

The question I would be asking of BA is what reasonable steps did you take whilst my bag was in your custody to ensure it wasn't stolen and that it was delivered to me?

Clearly delivering to a baggage carousel where there is a good chance the passenger won't yet be present is an issue as there is effectively nothing to prevent the bag from being stolen or interfered with.
As I said above, if I take the Conditions of Carriage to the letter, BA says that they will only deliver the bag to the rightful owner.

It was their choice not to deploy staff/take measures to make this happen - therefore it is their responsibility to pay for the stolen bag.

I agree with LTNPhobia that travel insurance may be a best option as it is less hassle, let them deal with BA. However, if my travel insurance didn't cover the full amount of the stolen bag, I would simply write back to them saying to pay up or I'd go to Small Claims Court, quoting their own Conditions of Carriage.
mario is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2015, 7:02 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia
Meanwhile it may be worthwhile complaining to the immigration department. Obviously they are not responsible for the criminal act by someone but it may may well have made it (inadvertently) easier for crimes to be committed.
I don't think I'd waste the cost of a stamp and a piece of paper. They won't be the slightest bit interested and the letter will go in the receptacle provided for that purpose.

Originally Posted by TabTraveller
Well most travel insurance policies have a single item limit of around £500 so in this case there would be uninsured losses to consider.

The question I would be asking of BA is what reasonable steps did you take whilst my bag was in your custody to ensure it wasn't stolen and that it was delivered to me?

Clearly delivering to a baggage carousel where there is a good chance the passenger won't yet be present is an issue as there is effectively nothing to prevent the bag from being stolen or interfered with.
Indeed but then the single item limit is something you have to bear in mind when transporting an expensive item of clothing. Maybe a letter to BA covering uninsured losses, but I would expect them to decline it. At that point decide whether small claims is worth the effort.

I'm sure BA would reply saying with the volume of traffic it would be impossible to deliver every bag to coincide with the traveller's arrival at the reclaim. They would probably also be able to come up with some stats showing the vast majority of people complain about late arrival of bags as opposed to early.

The only foolproof way is to check bags against tags on the way out, happened to me in Lusaka last week, however I suspect people would soon be on here moaning about delays in getting out the airport and also about the increased costs that would result.

Fortunately you hear about cases like this quite rarely. It doesn't make it in any way satisfactory, however if the Police can't identify the perpetrator then recovery from insurance would seem the most practical way forward.
simons1 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.