Community
Wiki Posts
Search

poor timing: SAN-BOS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 7:59 am
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA Gold, SPG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 1,024
poor timing: SAN-BOS

As a regular SAN-BOS flyer (at least once a month) I was happy to see VX join the game. I'm primarily a JetBlue and United flier. With 3x LAX-BOS and 2x SFO-BOS I figured there has got to be some good connecting flight options out of SAN.

Unfortunately is only one valid SAN-SFO-BOS daily flight option!! VX doesn't fly SAN-LAX so the LAX connections don't do me any good. Of the two flights out of SFO, the first one leaves too early to allow a connecting flight from SAN. Of the 5 west coast flights only one is valid from SAN (the red-eye via SFO). Did they realize this when they put together the schedule??
skylane is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 8:53 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,286
Probably. The connections out of SEA aren't that awesome, either- the only 7 day flight SEA-BOS is just the red-eye out of LAX, with 3+ hour layovers, plus a couple of M-F flights. BOS-SEA is better, but not much.

I am guessing that connecting traffic on VX is pretty slim, and that things are point to point, plus you really need more frequencies to make hub/spoke work. This is sort of logical when you realize that B6 and AS fly this route directly for SEA, much like UA and B6 fly this directly for SAN. VX is probably just trying to optimize scheduling for SFO and LAX at this point.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 9:16 am
  #3  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Slightly to the left of center
Posts: 3,482
Also seems JetBlue is bringing back SFO-BOS flights by early Summer 2009, at least according to another thread (have not heard an official announcement)
DBCme is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 9:22 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: VX, UA 2P
Posts: 968
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
VX is probably just trying to optimize scheduling for SFO and LAX at this point.
I wonder if the schedule is optimized for the VA flights coming into/out of LAX beginning in February (I see 3x LAX vs 2x SFO).
nermaljcat is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 9:36 am
  #5  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA Gold, SPG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 1,024
Codeshare SAN-LAX

If they codeshare SAN-LAX on UA or AA then I could at least catch the LAX flights. I wonder if that would ever happen.
skylane is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 9:55 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: VX, UA 2P
Posts: 968
Originally Posted by skylane
If they codeshare SAN-LAX on UA or AA then I could at least catch the LAX flights. I wonder if that would ever happen.
I doubt UA would codeshare with VX, they wouldn't even lease them gates at ORD they weren't using. UA appear to be threatened by them (rightly so IMO).
nermaljcat is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 10:11 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,286
Originally Posted by nermaljcat
I wonder if the schedule is optimized for the VA flights coming into/out of LAX beginning in February (I see 3x LAX vs 2x SFO).
I would think that would be their priority over SAN or SEA, to be honest.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 9:56 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Programs: TrueBlue, HHonors
Posts: 339
Originally Posted by skylane
If they codeshare SAN-LAX on UA or AA then I could at least catch the LAX flights. I wonder if that would ever happen.
A snowball's chance in a frying pan... VX's model is based on picking up market share from those two legacies. Coordinating with VX would be "un-capitalistic" even if it may makes things easier for their travelers.

Although you don't seem too enthused you still have AA through DFW, with speculation they may be back in the SAN-BOS market after winter and UA through ORD and DEN, not to mention the daily direct B6 year-round.
Mimi Imferst is offline  
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 1:45 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA Gold, SPG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 1,024
Originally Posted by Mimi Imferst
Although you don't seem too enthused you still have AA through DFW, with speculation they may be back in the SAN-BOS market after winter and UA through ORD and DEN, not to mention the daily direct B6 year-round.
I almost always fly the redeye. UA canceled the LAX-BOS redeye which just leaves me the SAN-SFO-BOS. DEN/DFW/ORD really don't factor in since those redeyes don't get me enough sleep. B6 is on my list - I just wish they'd offer some sort of elite program and had something I could upgrade into!!
skylane is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 1:47 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Programs: TrueBlue, HHonors
Posts: 339
Originally Posted by skylane
I almost always fly the redeye. UA canceled the LAX-BOS redeye which just leaves me the SAN-SFO-BOS. DEN/DFW/ORD really don't factor in since those redeyes don't get me enough sleep. B6 is on my list - I just wish they'd offer some sort of elite program and had something I could upgrade into!!
No F at B6 and no upgrade available into the EML seats(38" pitch). There has been speculation of a revamped FFP but I couldn't speculate about what it would include. There is a thread on the Trueblue FT page about it with all kinds of hair on fire speculation. Enjoy!
Mimi Imferst is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.