Community
Wiki Posts
Search

VX drops SJC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2014 | 11:06 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA 1K/AS Titanium …Bonvoy Titanium..Hertz Presidents Club
Posts: 1,349
VX drops SJC?

I was on a SFO-LAX flight this morning and heard that VX will discontinue SJC this coming May. He said an announcement will be out shortly.

After about one year of service and a sizable "donation" from SJC, this route was doomed from the beginning, IMO. Upwards of five carriers offering service is a little too much. I heard their weekday flights were often in the 20% LF range.
minhaoxue is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2014 | 11:40 pm
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: LAX
Programs: VX Gold
Posts: 427
I just checked on Virgin America's reservations page, and indeed it shows no availability after 5/14.
bayhouse is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 12:59 am
  #3  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,868
RIP

I rode this last year a few weeks after it came out and there was all of 20 of us on the plane -- lie-flat economy.
unavaca is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 1:14 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,868
Article is out: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/n....html?page=all
unavaca is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 8:22 am
  #5  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: SPG Gold, Hyatt GP Platinum
Posts: 496
VX should fire its planning and scheduling department, and seek advice on flyertalk instead. Everyone knew this route would be unsuccessful, except VX and SJC.
fishy21 is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 11:31 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 22
SJC-JFK would have been a better route
pdf1k is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 11:40 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by fishy21
VX should fire its planning and scheduling department, and seek advice on flyertalk instead. Everyone knew this route would be unsuccessful, except VX and SJC.
How do you fire darts and a dartboard?

If SJC gave a big enough subsidy, perhaps this was worthwhile for VX for a year.
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 12:40 pm
  #8  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,868
Originally Posted by pdf1k
SJC-JFK would have been a better route
That'd be worse than SJC-LAX. With no feed on either end of SJC-JFK, it's a tough sell to begin with. When you consider B6's hub at JFK, it'd be game over before takeoff.
unavaca is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 12:51 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,283
Originally Posted by fishy21
VX should fire its planning and scheduling department, and seek advice on flyertalk instead. Everyone knew this route would be unsuccessful, except VX and SJC.
Yeah, this is a big .

So, let's see, SNA, SJC, YYZ, LAX-PDX... for a small airline that's a lot of misfires.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 1:22 pm
  #10  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FUK/Fukuoka
Programs: AS, HA, JL, UA
Posts: 753
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
Yeah, this is a big .

So, let's see, SNA, SJC, YYZ, LAX-PDX... for a small airline that's a lot of misfires.
VX didn't decrease their PDX service. When LAX-PDX ended they moved the frames up to start 3x daily SFO-PDX.
Tanaka07 is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 1:55 pm
  #11  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: SPG Gold, Hyatt GP Platinum
Posts: 496
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
How do you fire darts and a dartboard?

If SJC gave a big enough subsidy, perhaps this was worthwhile for VX for a year.
Enough to pay for construction cost, fuel, plane, insurance, crew, marketing? I'm sure they received a good subsidy, but not enough to account for the $/time lost for a year.

In the end, poor decision, even if the subsidy covered everything because the route failed. And yes, I don't know how to fire darts & a dartboard. I wonder who is the next lucky employee to throw the dart for their next route.
fishy21 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014 | 2:34 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,283
Originally Posted by Tanaka07
VX didn't decrease their PDX service. When LAX-PDX ended they moved the frames up to start 3x daily SFO-PDX.
They still dropped a route.

Oh, and I forgot ANC.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014 | 3:55 pm
  #13  
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP, lowly UA 1K; Hyatt Diamond, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold; National EC, Hertz PC
Posts: 2,227
Too bad this didn't work out. It was a nice option to have if you still wanted a mainline plane and didn't want to fly WN.

adambadam is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2014 | 12:21 pm
  #14  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: LAX/SNA
Programs: AA, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,887
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
Yeah, this is a big .

So, let's see, SNA, SJC, YYZ, LAX-PDX... for a small airline that's a lot of misfires.
When did VX fly into SNA?
PainCorp is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2014 | 2:13 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 801
Originally Posted by PainCorp
When did VX fly into SNA?
They started SNA-SFO back in 2009. The route was dropped about a year later.
mr27 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.