Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Weight Restrictions out of LGA

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2012, 3:04 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: USAirways Plat, Intercontinental Plat, SkyMiles Gold, Mileage Plus Gold
Posts: 60
Weight Restrictions out of LGA

Is it normal for E145 to go out of LGA under weight restriction?

Flying out last Friday I was on standby for one of the earlier delayed flights to PIT. 3 CPs got on including me with about 10 people not getting on the flight. The flight departed with ~6 empty seats.

Was this due to weight or why would US do this?

Last edited by shamun160; Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 pm
shamun160 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 5:33 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: High Point, NC
Programs: None
Posts: 9,171
I don't know much about the ERJ-145 other than what it looks like, but it would be one of two things. Either a weight restriction or the GA didn't want to take a delay processing all the standby passengers.

Jim
BoeingBoy is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 5:38 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: USAirways Plat, Intercontinental Plat, SkyMiles Gold, Mileage Plus Gold
Posts: 60
Originally Posted by BoeingBoy
I don't know much about the ERJ-145 other than what it looks like, but it would be one of two things. Either a weight restriction or the GA didn't want to take a delay processing all the standby passengers.

Jim
It seemed to be a deliberate attempt to limit to 3 additional passengers. She called 3 names and when one did not show she let another CP take the place of the no show.

We were using the runway heading west, which was a 1st for me for takeoff. Maybe that had something to do with it.
shamun160 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 5:44 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 850
Looks like all flights this morning were taking off out of 31 towards the city; I thought it was odd...(LGA-BOS)
gsforfree is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 5:50 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: High Point, NC
Programs: None
Posts: 9,171
Originally Posted by shamun160
It seemed to be a deliberate attempt to limit to 3 additional passengers.
That does sound like a weight restriction issue then. Don't know enough about the plane to comment further.

Jim
BoeingBoy is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 7:57 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BGM/ PHL
Programs: US (Silver, *A Silver), AA, Starbucks (Gold)
Posts: 2,242
Originally Posted by BoeingBoy
That does sound like a weight restriction issue then. Don't know enough about the plane to comment further.

Jim
It's a 50 seater, comparable to a CRJ-200 though it's a bit longer and narrower.
thomwithanh is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 9:17 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 755
There's a thread on a.net titled "ERJ takeoff" which has a post from a 145 pilot who seems to indicate a max landing weight issue on the 145. That and a short segment probably ganged up on the people left behind.

My only 145 experience was CO's "how much torture can we inflict" EWR-OKC deal - where they manage to lighten the load sufficiently by turning jet fuel into noise for just under 4 hours.
LowlyDLsilver is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 8:14 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: US-CP, UA, Marriott Rewards, HHonors, Avis,
Posts: 4,549
If the OP was flying standby/move-up and got on the flight then I'd assume (or maybe hope) the folks who didn't make the flight were also standby and/or non-rev's. They'll be the first to go in a weight restricted situation.

I don't know the physics and mechanics of flight but if memory serves me, Friday was not a great weather day here in the Northeast, so perhaps the ERJ had to take on more fuel in anticipation of a potential diversion/flight path deviation/long ATC hold in the air, which would decrease the number of passengers who could be boarded.
dcpatti is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.