As Predicted - Mainline OAK-DEN Y no F
#16
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 旧金山/Old Gold Hill/SFO
Programs: UA 1P, Marriott Platium, SPG
Posts: 1,001
#17
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 旧金山/Old Gold Hill/SFO
Programs: UA 1P, Marriott Platium, SPG
Posts: 1,001
Even though SFO is the furthest of the three airports from my house, I prefer it because UA has more staff and more flights for better chance of getting assistance or accommodated during irrops. I will always get a jetway (those airstairs kill me with all the electronics I have to carry).
I know a guy who got really, really angry (I'll never fly UA again, angry) because he went to SJC to get a ticket issued as a non-elite, and was continually passed over by the one ticket agent because someone would always walk up to the priority line and he would get passed over. He is a WN guy, so I said, "Would you get a WN ticket issued at SFO? Then why would you go you SJC to get a UA ticket issued?"
#18
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 283
It sort of reminds me of when the Raiders and Rams both left Los Angeles at the same time. Either team likely would have been more profitable if they were the only team in town, but they both bailed out simultaneously.
#19
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wherever
Programs: UA 1MM for a while now, AS for a minute, BAEC newly minted Gold
Posts: 1,180
#20
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wherever
Programs: UA 1MM for a while now, AS for a minute, BAEC newly minted Gold
Posts: 1,180
-Cyborg
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,155
#22
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wherever
Programs: UA 1MM for a while now, AS for a minute, BAEC newly minted Gold
Posts: 1,180
#23
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Programs: UA, AA, WN; HH, MR, IHG
Posts: 7,054
Uh... "inferred" means that there is no reference; it is a conclusion drawn from the existing circumstantial evidence, which does not explicitly state anything but from which one may make an educated guess. If there were a reference, it wouldn't be an inference, it would be a known fact.
#24
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: DFW
Programs: UA MM 1K, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 250
For a quick fix for F on Ted plane, just install a curtain between row 3 and 4. Voila! Just like the Intra-Europe F on European carriers.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,739
I think I'll survive for the short 2 hour flight. Much better than sticking people with TED planes for 3-4 hours
At least UA still has service to OAK (unlike CO and AA). I guess UA figures F is a waste on this routing since WN doesn't offer it.
At least UA still has service to OAK (unlike CO and AA). I guess UA figures F is a waste on this routing since WN doesn't offer it.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Maybe, but I don't see a lot of profit for UA to go to ancillary airports within 60mi of a major hub. If people want to flly IAD-SJC on WN, on a 737 (or B6 on an A320) with no chance of upgrade vs. flying IAD-SFO on UA on a 777 with a decent chance to upgrade but further from your ultimate destination, they are welcome to do so.
UA has COS, Rockford, BWI, DCA, LGA, JFK, EWR etc. and doesn't seem to have plans to close the minor presences.
My guess is that at worst, SJC ditches DEN and ORD service, and adds hourly service to SFO, keeping the 757 service to IAD. SFO would be a combination of UX and mainline.
#27
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: RIC
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 3,387
United only very rarely operates a 757 on IAD-SJC. With the exception of a few Saturdays here and there, the route is almost always A319/A320.
#28
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wherever
Programs: UA 1MM for a while now, AS for a minute, BAEC newly minted Gold
Posts: 1,180
Now it's Back to TED
Now it's back to a TED flight, was mainline Y only a couple of days ago. Now it shows TED flight. What really throws this off is the Aircraft type is 320, not 321 as TED flights were designated. All those little clues are going away...
#29
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
on a serious note, moving the seats and adding a devider would be fairly easy to do, out come three rows of E+, in go three banks of F seats, a divider, and then squeeze a few extra inches out by moving the rest of the seats back.
what is harder is what to do with meal service. TED has no ovens up front and the video equipement up in the oven spots.
#30
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Platinum, AF, Chase, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 1,098
Huggh? "321" is an Airbus 321 (flown by e.g. US). I seriously doubt that UA uses that distinction? can you post where they did that?
on a serious note, moving the seats and adding a devider would be fairly easy to do, out come three rows of E+, in go three banks of F seats, a divider, and then squeeze a few extra inches out by moving the rest of the seats back.
what is harder is what to do with meal service. TED has no ovens up front and the video equipement up in the oven spots.
on a serious note, moving the seats and adding a devider would be fairly easy to do, out come three rows of E+, in go three banks of F seats, a divider, and then squeeze a few extra inches out by moving the rest of the seats back.
what is harder is what to do with meal service. TED has no ovens up front and the video equipement up in the oven spots.
I hate OAK but I fly into it because my sister goes to school in the East Bay and it's easier to get to than SFO or SJC, and I don't want to fly WN.