Is being moved from E- to E+ considered an op-up?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pre-9/11 America
Posts: 5,115
Is being moved from E- to E+ considered an op-up?
With the number of op-up related threads increasing (and the number of people seemingly getting op-ups decreasing), I now submit a long-standing question to the FT Council of Correctitude:
Is being moved from E- to E+ considered an op-up?
Yes: Because E+ is a service is not freely available to all pax
No: E+ is in the same cabin as E-, and access is not granted using standard upgrade instruments
Yes: An op-up can occur between any two differentiated products, and usually depends on substiantial differences in seat availability between two contiguous products
No: E+ is not a separate class of service from E-
So how do the Chief Justices (and Circuit Court Judges, etc) of FT rule?
Is being moved from E- to E+ considered an op-up?
Yes: Because E+ is a service is not freely available to all pax
No: E+ is in the same cabin as E-, and access is not granted using standard upgrade instruments
Yes: An op-up can occur between any two differentiated products, and usually depends on substiantial differences in seat availability between two contiguous products
No: E+ is not a separate class of service from E-
So how do the Chief Justices (and Circuit Court Judges, etc) of FT rule?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MileagePlus Premier Gold
Posts: 11,522
No, it's not officially, but there are good points of discussion here, so I'm interested in seeing what you all have to say.
#3




Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: AA EXP UA 2KMM AMB
Posts: 2,415
If we limit the term 'op-up' as strictly complimentary movement of passengers from one cabin/class to another, then E- to E+ will not be considered as an op-up.
However, in my book, UA's elites and others who get free access to E+ when flying economy, already get complimentary upgrade. UA's E+ seats clearly offer more space and comfort, and one of the reasons I will only fly UA (as much as possible) when flying domestically and internationally. It's an op-up ^
However, in my book, UA's elites and others who get free access to E+ when flying economy, already get complimentary upgrade. UA's E+ seats clearly offer more space and comfort, and one of the reasons I will only fly UA (as much as possible) when flying domestically and internationally. It's an op-up ^
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,195
I say no. A change of seating within a cabin is not an upgrade. Otherwise, you would have to call moving from a middle to an aisle or window an op-up as well.
If it were an upgrade, then you would also be entitled to a downgrade kit if moved from E+ to E-.
If it were an upgrade, then you would also be entitled to a downgrade kit if moved from E+ to E-.
#5



Join Date: Jun 2004
Programs: UA-Gold, AA-Gold, Hyatt-LIfeTime Diamond
Posts: 1,018
No, the only difference between E- & E+ IMO is the seat pitch. If this is OP-UP to E+, then you will need a 3rd/4th class in Y for bulk and exit rows....
#6
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAN
Programs: UA GS/1K/MM, VA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 5,581
The whole E+ marketing / branding is interesing. Its a cabin within a cabin. Its similar to middle seat blocking, in that its not guaranteed.
I'm not even sure UA has quite decided if its a separate cabin, or the same cabin. Y/B seats can still be sold if E+ is sold out. There are no fare classes associated with seats in E+ (only you can sit there if there is space). Inventory management does not manage E+ inventory. FAs may/may not enforce seat assignments in E/E+. etc etc.
While there are advantages of this, (not least of which is the employer that only pays for the lowest class and would not therefore pay for premium economy as a separate class
), the whole positioning of E+ is somewhat schizophrenic IMO.
So is it an op-up. Its in the eye of the beholder. If you believe you have been op-uped, and it makes you happy, then go with it.
I'm not even sure UA has quite decided if its a separate cabin, or the same cabin. Y/B seats can still be sold if E+ is sold out. There are no fare classes associated with seats in E+ (only you can sit there if there is space). Inventory management does not manage E+ inventory. FAs may/may not enforce seat assignments in E/E+. etc etc.
While there are advantages of this, (not least of which is the employer that only pays for the lowest class and would not therefore pay for premium economy as a separate class
), the whole positioning of E+ is somewhat schizophrenic IMO.So is it an op-up. Its in the eye of the beholder. If you believe you have been op-uped, and it makes you happy, then go with it.
#7
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Programs: United GS 1MM, WN A-List, Marriott LTPPE, CLEAR
Posts: 533
My parents were offered to "upgrade" for $55 from E- to E+ from KOA to SFO. While not an "op-up", it has to be considered an upgrade of somesort. And no, neither are UA or US elite.
#8
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAN
Programs: UA GS/1K/MM, VA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 5,581
Originally Posted by bwicoplat
My parents were offered to "upgrade" for $55 from E- to E+ from KOA to SFO. While not an "op-up", it has to be considered an upgrade of somesort. And no, neither are UA or US elite.
#9
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: UA-1K, AA-PLT 3MM
Posts: 114
*****
Last edited by Xplorer; Nov 28, 2010 at 10:21 pm
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,195
Originally Posted by Xplorer
I for one am very interested to hear the outcome of such a bold move!
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: Nah.
Posts: 13,971
Since you are moving to a better seat in the same cabin, and not to a higher cabin, No, it is not an upgrade. The same fare classes sit in E+ & E- everyday, where as sitting in C or F requires a new higher booking class.
If E+ is an op-up, then an exit row, bulkhead or even middle->window/aisle must be an op-up. So I think not.
If E+ is an op-up, then an exit row, bulkhead or even middle->window/aisle must be an op-up. So I think not.
#13




Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP MM, HHonors Lifetime Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Ti, UA Silver
Posts: 5,215
I think it comes down to your notion of just how significant an improvement in your flying situation has occurred. On UA there are some seats in the E- section that are considered better than most of the E+ seats on certain aircraft types. Add to that the fact that the level of service is no different between E+ and E- and the case gets weaker still.
Finally, IMHO it comes down to a matter of common usage on FT. On FT an op up has always meant something quite significant. Something where your flying experience was greatly improved and you were thrilled to get it. In other words, something worthy of posting on FT! I honestly dont think that the difference between E+ and E- passes that threshold.
Finally, IMHO it comes down to a matter of common usage on FT. On FT an op up has always meant something quite significant. Something where your flying experience was greatly improved and you were thrilled to get it. In other words, something worthy of posting on FT! I honestly dont think that the difference between E+ and E- passes that threshold.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA, AA
Posts: 4,039
I've never gotten a downgrade kit for sitting in E- as opposed to E+ as an elite.
#15




Join Date: May 2006
Location: GA
Programs: VA-SLV, QF-GLD, DL-PM, UA-ex1K, AA-exPLT, HH-DM, IHG-PLT, MR-GLD
Posts: 8,353
Originally Posted by Xplorer
No!
Consider this:
Suppose you are flying IAD-FRA on a 777. Your seat number is 32G, which is a "normal" E- seat. Now, imagine that there are a bunch of empty seats available in rows 24-26 (E+). Although it is not 100% "legit", I do not think too many people will raise an eyebrow if you moved from your seat to, say, 25C (considering it was empty). .... I am even willing to bet that if you plolitely asked the FA if you could change your seat, they more than likely wouldn't give you too much hastle.
Consider this:
Suppose you are flying IAD-FRA on a 777. Your seat number is 32G, which is a "normal" E- seat. Now, imagine that there are a bunch of empty seats available in rows 24-26 (E+). Although it is not 100% "legit", I do not think too many people will raise an eyebrow if you moved from your seat to, say, 25C (considering it was empty). .... I am even willing to bet that if you plolitely asked the FA if you could change your seat, they more than likely wouldn't give you too much hastle.
That, combined with the fact that it costs extra! to sit in E+ without status... seems like more of an op-up than not to me. Definitely a SMALL op-up, but still an op-up.

