UA 767-300 N641UA structural damage after hard landing (has returned to service)
#196
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: IAH
Programs: MileagePlus-Premier Silver, Marriott Bonvoy-Silver Elite
Posts: 703
It's flying IAH-MUC tomorrow 3/29, UA102.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n641ua#
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n641ua#
#198
Join Date: Oct 2016
Programs: MC - Gold HH-Diamond UA - 1K
Posts: 69
It's flying IAH-MUC tomorrow 3/29, UA102.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n641ua#
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n641ua#
It flew its first return to scheduled flight as UA854-27 IAHLIM and returned to IAH as a cargo ferry today.
#199
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
UA 767-300 N641UA structural damage after hard landing (has returned to service)
UA 767-300 N641UA structural damage after hard landing (has returned to service)
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Mar 28, 2024 at 7:44 pm
#200
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: IAD
Programs: UA Plat, HH Diamond, Supersonic (BA1Y, BA1223)
Posts: 221
It's flying IAH-MUC tomorrow 3/29, UA102.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n641ua#
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n641ua#
He started at UA about a year ago and I just found out talking to him last night that he got 76s.
I made an offhand comment about 641 getting back up. He didnt know what his tail number would be, but I'll have to send him a thumbs up!
Edit: Woops, small detail.... Pretty sure he would be departing IAD, not IAH... Thats what happens when you post before coffee...
Last edited by huey_driver; Mar 29, 2024 at 6:16 am
#201
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: IAH
Programs: MileagePlus-Premier Silver, Marriott Bonvoy-Silver Elite
Posts: 703
Hah! My 'instructor' is the FO on that one!
He started at UA about a year ago and I just found out talking to him last night that he got 76s.
I made an offhand comment about 641 getting back up. He didnt know what his tail number would be, but I'll have to send him a thumbs up!
Edit: Woops, small detail.... Pretty sure he would be departing IAD, not IAH... Thats what happens when you post before coffee...
He started at UA about a year ago and I just found out talking to him last night that he got 76s.
I made an offhand comment about 641 getting back up. He didnt know what his tail number would be, but I'll have to send him a thumbs up!
Edit: Woops, small detail.... Pretty sure he would be departing IAD, not IAH... Thats what happens when you post before coffee...
#203
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA Silver, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 21,558
A re-engined 767 probably could've been the new NLA. The frame has obviously proven to be great. Just toss in modern avionics and some carbon fiber bits here and there to make it lighter, and they could've had a massive order book.
#205
Join Date: Oct 2016
Programs: MC - Gold HH-Diamond UA - 1K
Posts: 69
Her schedule is updated now; she is sitting at IAH next to Bldg H (Hangar) - been there since the LIM cargo ferry return - no movement. Currently pending a routing starting on Mar 31 UA852-31 IAHLIM. Time will tell....
#207
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,454
If the passenger tooling still exists -- to the extent it's different from the 767F -- I wouldn't be shocked if Boeing accepted a fistful of money for an airline (or leasing company) in exchange for an order. Remember a large part of the reason Boeing couldn't (economically) restart 757 production after it became clear there was a void for an aircraft in that role/capability mix was that Boeing had (directed its vendors to) scrap the tooling. Once the tooling is gone the costs and complexities go way, way, way, up. Now the engine/environmental considerations may have economic lifespan considerations that further moot this... but where there's will and money there's usually a way.
Not only that, given the impending ICAO 2027 regulations, a reborn passenger 767 would most certainly require a different engine, further adding to the cost/complexity. There was definitely a window for Boeing to make a 767NG work, but that time has come and gone.