LH Business v UA Polaris
#31
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 5,453
#32
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Programs: United 1K, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 520
LH's ground crews are still in meltdown modes. I had three 2-segment flights in the last three weeks. Each time they left my bags in the connection city. If you plan on taking LH and connecting with a checked bag, expect your bag to arrive a day or two late.
#33
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,595
I think Americans people rate LH higher due to the novelty of the menu. Their new short-haul "taste of Germany" is quite good. But as a European I find their long-haul standards, especially the wine menu, to be very low. I've also encountered situations where only a vegetarian meal was available and alcohol was not fully stocked. These things can happen on any airline at any time, but there is a general pattern of this on LH.
.
.
When Polaris was first rolled out, UA offered a competitive product. Kirby has decimated that product.
UA does the same thing.
Last edited by halls120; Dec 3, 2022 at 10:15 am
#34
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 923
Appreciated all of the responses. After posting but prior to reviewing the responses, I thought: I know Polaris, and I like it bc I find the seat comfortable and easy to sleep. I've never found UA food/service to be comparable to non-US carriers, but I'm ok with that since that is sometimes variable. The hard product is not. So I concluded, why would I want to chance a poor experience on such a long flight? As my wife and others in the Apple cult assert: it just works. I guess for me, Polaris just works (enough).
With that stated and since I'll be traveling with my wife, I think we are going to try to snag LH/LX on the westbound. I had always heard a lot of rumblings about LX that I never even considered. One potentially awesome option would be to fly the 748 in J or above, which I have never flown. My wife has never flown any 747 period. I have always wanted to be in the nose in F. My only trepidation would be disappointment in that the plane/hard product might be too old, but based on the responses, that does not seem to be the case (and I'm not sure I saw the Queen on my options in any event).
With that stated and since I'll be traveling with my wife, I think we are going to try to snag LH/LX on the westbound. I had always heard a lot of rumblings about LX that I never even considered. One potentially awesome option would be to fly the 748 in J or above, which I have never flown. My wife has never flown any 747 period. I have always wanted to be in the nose in F. My only trepidation would be disappointment in that the plane/hard product might be too old, but based on the responses, that does not seem to be the case (and I'm not sure I saw the Queen on my options in any event).
#35
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,925
I think this really varies depending on individual tastes. Being an American carrier, this could just be UA catering to American tastes more, while Lufthansa is more catered to German tastes. To me, I would take LH on a daytime flight any day over UA for the catering and service, even though the Polaris seat is obviously much more private.
As far as, J seats - Polaris is better than LH for me.
#36
formerly Sleepy_Sentry
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 614
It's not just the "novelty" of the menu. They actually serve what they advertise. And it's not just that - the boarding process is smooth and efficient, a FA introduces themself near the beginning of the flight, and then stops by near the end of the flight to ask if you had an enjoyable flight. They don't disappear after meal service. The cabins and lava are clean.
When Polaris was first rolled out, UA offered a competitive product. Kirby has decimated that product.
UA does the same thing.
When Polaris was first rolled out, UA offered a competitive product. Kirby has decimated that product.
UA does the same thing.
#37
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,092
I think it’s more a matter of an individual’s palate, in general, as opposed to catering to American tastes or German tastes. While being an American, I have been in Germany many, many times and love German food. With that said, LH TATL J food is mediocre. IMO, if you want better LH group food, fly with OS.
As far as, J seats - Polaris is better than LH for me.
As far as, J seats - Polaris is better than LH for me.
Unfortunately from a product perspective star alliance is probably weakest transatlantic offering, especially with BA upgrading their J product
#38
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SFO
Posts: 1,754
Of the *A carriers, I actually like flying AC TATL these days, if I have time for the connection. Everything is pretty good - service, seats, IFE, food/drink. Transit logistics at YYZ/YUL isn't ideal, but it's not the worst thing in the world. The Acqua di Parma amenity kits are super cool, too.
I am trying to decide if its really worth it. Daytime flight, so no sleeping. If I sit in PE I get the window seat, but business puts me in the middle of the plane. Is the soft product and food “that much better” than PE?
#39
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: EWR
Programs: UA 1K & Marriott Titanium
Posts: 96
flew LH J this week, for the first time in years. EWR > MUC.
the seats are, well, the same that i remember and far inferior to Polaris. (new LH cabins start rolling out in 2023).
since they don't have individual aisle access, i prefer the middle seats. at least overnight where i don't want to be climbing/climbed over during sleeping hours. (ofc the shared "footsie" ottoman is weird)
the food and onboard service are far superior to Polaris IME.
UA P+ seats are superior to current LH Premium Economy seats.
the seats are, well, the same that i remember and far inferior to Polaris. (new LH cabins start rolling out in 2023).
since they don't have individual aisle access, i prefer the middle seats. at least overnight where i don't want to be climbing/climbed over during sleeping hours. (ofc the shared "footsie" ottoman is weird)
the food and onboard service are far superior to Polaris IME.
UA P+ seats are superior to current LH Premium Economy seats.
#40
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,046
My wife and I currently have a flight from FCO-YUL and then connecting to YUL-SFO. We are booked into premium economy. I bid to upgrade both of us for $970 usd.
I am trying to decide if its really worth it. Daytime flight, so no sleeping. If I sit in PE I get the window seat, but business puts me in the middle of the plane. Is the soft product and food “that much better” than PE?
I am trying to decide if its really worth it. Daytime flight, so no sleeping. If I sit in PE I get the window seat, but business puts me in the middle of the plane. Is the soft product and food “that much better” than PE?
#41
Join Date: Jul 2013
Programs: DYKWIA, But I'm a "Diamond Guest" UA 1K/2MM
Posts: 2,257
But the service is the biggest difference. As an earlier poster mentioned, the LH FAs don't disappear after the meal service only to materialize right before the plane lands. They accommodate your pace, rather than rushing you so they can go back to their games in the galley.
I can't count the number of times UA flight attendants have whisked away my tray before I was done. Or the times they've ended their service when the plane was over an hour away from the destination. If you keep in mind that it's all about the employees and not the customer, you will understand United service.
LH First and Biz are like going to an elegant European restaurant, whereas United is more like a cheap diner.
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,413
I would prefer the Polaris seat and LH soft product, so for me it's a tossup.
There are some who have a near-fanatical hatred of any seat that is not all aisle access, so that will generate some anti-LH bias. Personally I don't mind a 2-2(-2) configuration at all, although the privacy from Polaris is nice. Splitting the difference seems like a nice way to go, especially if you can get upstairs on a 747 with a companion in the other seat.
Ironically I find the LX seat fine for sleeping, but awful for being awake. When in a semi-reclined position, my legs are up at an angle so I am always smashing my shins on the edge of the well. I have similar issues with other "long-tunnel" designs like the newer DL seats.
There are some who have a near-fanatical hatred of any seat that is not all aisle access, so that will generate some anti-LH bias. Personally I don't mind a 2-2(-2) configuration at all, although the privacy from Polaris is nice. Splitting the difference seems like a nice way to go, especially if you can get upstairs on a 747 with a companion in the other seat.
Yes, the seats with tunnels for your legs are problematic for people who tend to move in their sleep. It's one of those things you may not even be aware of until you fly in a restrictive seat and wake up with a bunch of bruises. I tend to stay pretty still but the lack of padding on certain seats (LX and B6 come to mind) causes me lots of pain in hips and shoulders. I loved the old IPTE seat for sleeping.
#43
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, Total Wine & More Reserve
Posts: 4,503
Sadly, that's still enough to surpass UA.
Yep. On one of my LH TATLs this year, I dozed off after takeoff and didn't begin eating until well into the meal service. The FA said to ring the call button when I'm ready for the next course. Don't recall ever hearing that on UA.
But the service is the biggest difference. As an earlier poster mentioned, the LH FAs don't disappear after the meal service only to materialize right before the plane lands. They accommodate your pace, rather than rushing you so they can go back to their games in the galley.
#44
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CHI
Programs: UA 1K, MR Titanium, IHG Gold, National Exec
Posts: 3,841
My wife and I currently have a flight from FCO-YUL and then connecting to YUL-SFO. We are booked into premium economy. I bid to upgrade both of us for $970 usd.
I am trying to decide if its really worth it. Daytime flight, so no sleeping. If I sit in PE I get the window seat, but business puts me in the middle of the plane. Is the soft product and food “that much better” than PE?
I am trying to decide if its really worth it. Daytime flight, so no sleeping. If I sit in PE I get the window seat, but business puts me in the middle of the plane. Is the soft product and food “that much better” than PE?
#45
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,046
LH food and service is far superior to UA, not even on the same planet. UA's seat is much better. red-eye to Europe ... UA (or LH First) and back from Europe ... I think LH business is just fine and a lot more time to enjoy the service