Surely the demand is exceeding supply
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,023
Southwest technically doesn’t actually block seats since there’s no seat assignments. When boarding, they announce they have sold only enough tickets to enable the middle seats to remain unoccupied. They go on to say families can occupy adjacent seats. WN’s weakness is they obviously don’t board back-to-front, so there’s a lot more proximity while boarding as late boarders generally pass early boarders.
#17
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,958
Southwest technically doesn’t actually block seats since there’s no seat assignments. When boarding, they announce they have sold only enough tickets to enable the middle seats to remain unoccupied. They go on to say families can occupy adjacent seats. WN’s weakness is they obviously don’t board back-to-front, so there’s a lot more proximity while boarding as late boarders generally pass early boarders.
#18
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,115
UA has woefully underestimated LA demand. I get that these were crazy times, but adjust fast.
#19
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
Read this yesterday. He has a few theories in there, each of which makes some sense. The actual reasons are likely a combination of 1 or 2 of those theories. https://www.forbes.com/sites/willhor...Q#3fbdee9c2c6c
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
UA's pricing and inventory management have seemed out of whack compared to other carriers since they started cutting due to COVID-19. The result . . . not only do they push customers to other airlines based on price/capacity, they antagonize a meaningful percentage of the ones who do fly with them due to packed aircraft. Brilliant management once again by UA's crack leadership team!
Don't know about you, but I'd rather walk by a seated pax through an empty aisle (WN) then be jammed three across for five hours (UA).
Don't know about you, but I'd rather walk by a seated pax through an empty aisle (WN) then be jammed three across for five hours (UA).
#21
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,452
United's strategy has been quite conservative, but we are far from out of the woods yet. Business travel remains at near-zero levels, yields appear to be quite low and international (pax) is completely trashed.
With that said, the schedule is ramping up after Independence Day holiday. IAH-LAX, for instance, looks like it is going to 4x (3x 739 and 1x 753).
My strategy thus far has been totally airline-agnostic. If it's a nonstop, I'm on it. The incremental risk of exposure with increasing load factors is outweighed, IMO, by spending more time in overall transit. So I've found myself about evenly distributed across AA, DL, UA (sitting next to someone on each flight) now that WN has exited EWR.
Last edited by EWR764; Jun 30, 2020 at 10:45 am
#22
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,126
To be fair, I think mainline UAL pilots have been saying that about management since about 1978 or so... and probably before that.
United's strategy has been quite conservative, but we are far from out of the woods yet. Business travel remains at near-zero levels, yields appear to be quite low and international (pax) is completely trashed.
With that said, the schedule is ramping up after Independence Day holiday. IAH-LAX, for instance, looks like it is going to 4x (3x 739 and 1x 753).
My strategy thus far has been totally airline-agnostic. If it's a nonstop, I'm on it. The incremental risk of exposure with increasing load factors is outweighed, IMO, by spending more time in overall transit. So I've found myself about evenly distributed across AA, DL, UA (sitting next to someone on each flight) now that WN has exited EWR.
United's strategy has been quite conservative, but we are far from out of the woods yet. Business travel remains at near-zero levels, yields appear to be quite low and international (pax) is completely trashed.
With that said, the schedule is ramping up after Independence Day holiday. IAH-LAX, for instance, looks like it is going to 4x (3x 739 and 1x 753).
My strategy thus far has been totally airline-agnostic. If it's a nonstop, I'm on it. The incremental risk of exposure with increasing load factors is outweighed, IMO, by spending more time in overall transit. So I've found myself about evenly distributed across AA, DL, UA (sitting next to someone on each flight) now that WN has exited EWR.
#23
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
Personally, I don't think new new passengers are making that much of a difference to the bottom line.
#24
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,126
Traffic continues to grow and the 7-day average of TSA throughput compared to last year now has risen to 22.4%. Traffic (as measured by TSA throughput) has almost exactly doubled in one month. Now maybe these are mostly tickets bought long ago and moved into the future but I don't think that can account for most or maybe even much of it.
Last edited by JimInOhio; Jun 30, 2020 at 1:43 pm
#25
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: TPA
Programs: United MP
Posts: 463
Traffic continues to grow and the 7-day average of TSA throughput compared to last year now has risen to 22.4%. Traffic (as measured by TSA throughput) has almost exactly doubled in one month. Now maybe these are mostly tickets bought long ago and moved into the future but I don't think that can account for most or maybe even much of it.
#26
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
Traffic continues to grow and the 7-day average of TSA throughput compared to last year now has risen to 22.4%. Traffic (as measured by TSA throughput) has almost exactly doubled in one month. Now maybe these are mostly tickets bought long ago and moved into the future but I don't think that can account for most or maybe much of it.
Given the rate the States in Northeast are asking much of the US to quarantine on arrival (although more on the honor system compared to Hawaii) - it will be interesting to see the impact on traffic, the strategy by UA to add flights gradually may ultimately be the right strategy.
#27
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
Traffic continues to grow and the 7-day average of TSA throughput compared to last year now has risen to 22.4%. Traffic (as measured by TSA throughput) has almost exactly doubled in one month. Now maybe these are mostly tickets bought long ago and moved into the future but I don't think that can account for most or maybe even much of it.
#28
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,452
Traffic continues to grow and the 7-day average of TSA throughput compared to last year now has risen to 22.4%. Traffic (as measured by TSA throughput) has almost exactly doubled in one month. Now maybe these are mostly tickets bought long ago and moved into the future but I don't think that can account for most or maybe even much of it.
I don't think much, if any air travel consumer behavior during the pandemic will be predictive of what the environment will be on the other side of this thing. IMO, at this point there isn't really much to gain, and arguably still a fair bit to lose.
#29
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,126
I think it's reasonable to call into question United's strategy here, for sure. But the approach seems to be not to fill airplanes with low-yield traffic, which would appear to comprise most of the demand in the current domestic market. UA also has a hub in the hardest-hit metro area (which is now imposing "suggested" 14-day quarantine on arrivals from some 16 states) and 3 hubs in areas with rapidly-increasing cases+hospitalizations. So, from UAL's perspective, there is still significant risk associated with firing up schedules way ahead of demand.
I don't think much, if any air travel consumer behavior during the pandemic will be predictive of what the environment will be on the other side of this thing. IMO, at this point there isn't really much to gain, and arguably still a fair bit to lose.
I don't think much, if any air travel consumer behavior during the pandemic will be predictive of what the environment will be on the other side of this thing. IMO, at this point there isn't really much to gain, and arguably still a fair bit to lose.
UA sure looks like they are betting on another travel collapse. It's risky, IMHO, because they've already given away much of their competitive advantage... namely high frequencies in large markets. It's one thing to have hourly ORD-LGA, and EWR-LAX service, for example, but when you reduce that to a few token flights, what are you left with to make yourself look appealing?
#30
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
Travel has already collapsed - 22.4% of people traveling from a year ago is not a recovery. Given states rolling back reopening or pausing reopening - and newly announced quarantines, the bet seems to be a sound one.