Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 32352193)
And now, they can't even deliver on a schedule that would enable their HVFs and forcing folks to take multiple stops. The time sensitive HVFs will choose what works, not what UA forces them into.
They are sinking and they know it. David |
I am sure this is covered in other threads...how do pilots stay current with their certification if they:
1 - stay with UA but do not get to fly 2 - don't stay with UA and unemployed for a long time It is just so hard to imagine people and companies reinventing themselves in such a difficult environment. Some do and come out stronger. So keep that hope! |
Originally Posted by username
(Post 32352304)
It is just so hard to imagine people and companies reinventing themselves in such a difficult environment. Some do and come out stronger. So keep that hope!
Kirby is no Grove. They’re screwed. |
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
(Post 32352425)
Bad companies are destroyed by crisis, Good companies survive them, Great companies are improved by them. -Andy Grove
Good = UA, Delta... Great = Southwest, Ryan Air... |
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 32352193)
Disagree. UA's boat was drilled with holes to start 2020 by management deciding to shift their mileage accrual structure to enable "HVFs" and structured "discounts" for their contractual corporate accounts. Go back to the change announcements and a significant move from many folks who'd stuck with UA and/or CO, with a multiplicity that were their loyal FFs for decades.
And now, they can't even deliver on a schedule that would enable their HVFs and forcing folks to take multiple stops. The time sensitive HVFs will choose what works, not what UA forces them into. |
Originally Posted by username
(Post 32352304)
I am sure this is covered in other threads...how do pilots stay current with their certification if they:
1 - stay with UA but do not get to fly 2 - don't stay with UA and unemployed for a long time If they are sidelined for a while, they can get current when they are getting ready to return by doing some takeoffs and landings in a simulator. It is not like they will have to start all over with their training if they lose currency. |
Originally Posted by hockey7711
(Post 32351063)
They can start with the excessive number of VP's.
|
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 32352193)
And now, they can't even deliver on a schedule that would enable their HVFs and forcing folks to take multiple stops. The time sensitive HVFs will choose what works, not what UA forces them into.
Aside from that, the usual slate of gripes and complaints about United from the pre-COVID era are meaningless now. This is a brave new world. |
I can’t speak to corporate cuts, but I’m still holding out that the majority of the domestic frontline jobs will be saved. I can see things rebounding in the late Summer, fall, to the point where airlines can chart a more feasible path forward.
International travel will obviously take more time, so inflight & foreign ground crews might be in higher jeopardy. |
Originally Posted by CALMSP
(Post 32353128)
agreed. while yes, its a massive company, but it still seems like a large amount of executives (not counting Oscar/Scott) with 6 EVP, 13 SVP and 37 VP.
|
Originally Posted by CALMSP
(Post 32353128)
agreed. while yes, its a massive company, but it still seems like a large amount of executives (not counting Oscar/Scott) with 6 EVP, 13 SVP and 37 VP.
|
Originally Posted by worldtrav
(Post 32353481)
So will these 56 overpaid executives be whittled down by 30%? Anyone taking bets how many will be there after October 1?
|
Originally Posted by worldtrav
(Post 32353481)
So will these 56 overpaid executives be whittled down by 30%? Anyone taking bets how many will be there after October 1?
(EWR764 beat me to it! :tu:) |
Originally Posted by DELee
(Post 32352193)
Disagree. UA's boat was drilled with holes to start 2020 by management deciding to shift their mileage accrual structure to enable "HVFs" and structured "discounts" for their contractual corporate accounts. Go back to the change announcements and a significant move from many folks who'd stuck with UA and/or CO, with a multiplicity that were their loyal FFs for decades.
For all we know it could have worked great - or not. No doubt in my mind this was a major internal project at UA - with a lot of data crunching - this was a major decision probably with some careers on the line so I don't buy into a certainty it wouldn't have worked. |
Originally Posted by emma dog
(Post 32349829)
Youre assuming companies are hiring. At 25% unemployment, I don’t think finding a new job is possible for significant numbers of UA employees.
Whether companies are hiring or not isn't really the point, however. The message sent to employees is that their jobs might not be there come October. As such, employees should probably start looking for other options. It doesn't hurt any employee to start looking. Should they be able to find another job, they can then make the decision as to whether to take it or not. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:06 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.