US to EU: 772 via BRU or 763 via ZRH?
Jan 24, 2020, 9:50 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: IAD
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 209
US to EU: 772 via BRU or 763 via ZRH?
Looking to book an award (Polaris) and my choices are:
(1) IAD-BRU-FRA on a 772 (1:50 connection time)
(2) IAD-ZRH-FRA on a 763 High-J (1:35 connection time)
Departure / arrival times are roughly the same. For both, the TATL legs are UA metal, and LH A320 for the quick intra-Europe hop.
I'm used to the 772, so know what to expect there. Never flown on the 763 though; imagine it feels much more cramped than the 772?
Also have never been through BRU or ZRH, so don't know what to expect there either.
Would love to hear any opinions / suggestions / advice on which option to choose, and why. TIA!
(1) IAD-BRU-FRA on a 772 (1:50 connection time)
(2) IAD-ZRH-FRA on a 763 High-J (1:35 connection time)
Departure / arrival times are roughly the same. For both, the TATL legs are UA metal, and LH A320 for the quick intra-Europe hop.
I'm used to the 772, so know what to expect there. Never flown on the 763 though; imagine it feels much more cramped than the 772?
Also have never been through BRU or ZRH, so don't know what to expect there either.
Would love to hear any opinions / suggestions / advice on which option to choose, and why. TIA!
Jan 24, 2020, 10:02 pm
#2
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
If both have the new hard product, I would still probably go with the second one. I prefer ZRH to BRU. Grab some Sprungli while you are transiting 
If you are tall / wide, you may care for the slightly bigger dimensions of the new Polaris seat on IAD-BRU.
If you are tall / wide, you may care for the slightly bigger dimensions of the new Polaris seat on IAD-BRU.
Jan 24, 2020, 10:31 pm
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
I hate FRA. Glorified concrete jungle aka prison. Never been to ZRH. I can’t imagine ZRH transit would be as much walking too.
Edit: I misread OP. FRA is the endpoint not transit. Apologies.
Edit: I misread OP. FRA is the endpoint not transit. Apologies.
Last edited by uastarflyer; Jan 24, 2020 at 10:37 pm
Jan 24, 2020, 10:35 pm
#5
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
Good thing OP is terminating travel there, then
Jan 24, 2020, 10:49 pm
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461
Jan 25, 2020, 2:42 am
#7
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: UA-1K MM, AA-Gold, DL-Silver, AS-MVP
Posts: 2,509
I would pick ZRH over BRU. I think BRU you still need to re-clear security to connect from a US arrival. And BRU has that terrible immigration control setup that seems to take forever (by EU standards).
Jan 25, 2020, 10:19 am
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,055
Jan 25, 2020, 10:52 am
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,461
It's an efficient airport, but 15 minutes to clear immigration, take the Heidi train, and clear security is quite unlikely. And it can be quite a walk to the gate depending on where in A/B your flight is departing from.