Tight Connection in HKG - Denied Boarding Because Bags Misconnect
#61
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,417
In this situation, the reissuing airline has to take control of the original ticket and do an exchange; it's the only way they can end up getting paid for the flight. That includes all of the information about fares paid. (If you'll recall, until they shut off access when UA stopped allowing interline tickets, the Saudia site used to allow anyone to look up UA tickets and get the full fare construction -- it was a great tool when you needed to go back and look up fare rules).
#62
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,424
Yes, they will.
In this situation, the reissuing airline has to take control of the original ticket and do an exchange; it's the only way they can end up getting paid for the flight. That includes all of the information about fares paid. (If you'll recall, until they shut off access when UA stopped allowing interline tickets, the Saudia site used to allow anyone to look up UA tickets and get the full fare construction -- it was a great tool when you needed to go back and look up fare rules).
In this situation, the reissuing airline has to take control of the original ticket and do an exchange; it's the only way they can end up getting paid for the flight. That includes all of the information about fares paid. (If you'll recall, until they shut off access when UA stopped allowing interline tickets, the Saudia site used to allow anyone to look up UA tickets and get the full fare construction -- it was a great tool when you needed to go back and look up fare rules).
#63
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,478
IME CX agents at HKG are very sharp, much more so than we are used to with US carriers. I would expect they were fully aware this was an upgraded ticket.
#64
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: United Platinum, AA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 155
I will verify, but I believe CX knew it was an upgrade. They didn't upgrade the intra-US leg because her upgrade hadn't yet cleared on the equivalent flight on the original itinerary.
#65
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,478
Again, the underlying coupon was for economy travel, which would have been evident to whoever handled the rebooking.
#66
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
You can't put one thing in an obvious spot, then bury something else in a contract of adhesion, then try and enforce the latter.
If the thing you hand the passenger says 15, then it's 15.
#67
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,478
#68
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MFR
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,885
So if that’s not true, what’s the point?