Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UM Placed on incorrect flight at EWR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2019, 11:07 pm
  #121  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,162
Originally Posted by GUWonder
And yet UA tried to provide UAM service this time.
As the saying goes, "no good deed goes unpunished".

UA tried to do the right thing here. The other option - and the correct one as per their UM policy - would have been to have denied boarding (or more specifically, denied check-in) at the origin airport.

Instead someone decided to bend (break?) the rules, and it came back to bite them - mainly it would appear due to the mistakes of the EW agents who incorrectly allowed a non-manifested passenger onto an international flight. (Yes, it seems there were other mistakes - but that's the one that was the most egregious).

From all accounts, the UA agent took the passenger to the gate listed on the boarding pass, handed him off to the gate agent there who then gave him someone elses boarding pass and then allowed him to board without properly checking the passengers passport.
onthesam and txaggiemiles like this.
docbert is offline  
Old Jul 7, 2019, 10:41 am
  #122  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: USA
Programs: UA Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,195
Originally Posted by GUWonder
That is not litigators ignoring the waivers. It’s the plaintiff-side litigators trying to have the waiver not get in the way of winning a case against the defendant.
In plain layman’s words, ignoring the waivers. However you want to put it, when they put aside the fact that the plaintiff knowingly signed a waiver without compulsion, they’re ignoring it.
ExplorerWannabe is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.