Gutted over loss of GFL
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
Excuse me. It is a trailer park (just strung end to end), not a bus station. That was actually the 1 F lounge that I never cared much for. (Ok, old ORD F lounge wasn't so hot, either.) When the "new" SFO lounge opened in 2000-ish, that was a beautiful lounge. Quiet, well-appointed, very good beverage, ok food. LAX was pretty good, JFK had great staff. LHR was good. I don't believe I ever visited SEA or EWR.
#19
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DCA, IAD (not BWI if I can help it)
Programs: UA 1MM 1K, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Explorist, status-free on AA, AS, B6, DL, WN, Amtrak, etc.
Posts: 1,481
Booo!!! I only got to try out the GFL briefly in April and was already looking forward to spending more time there at the end of August. Back to LH it is...
FWIW, the View From the Wing report appears to be
confirming https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29866798-post8.html by ua1flyer. According to that post and subsequent replies, United will somehow shoehorn a Polaris Lounge into the D end of the concourse, even though most long-haul international flights leave from the C gates. That also suggests the C/D perma-temporary concourse isn't getting a date with a wrecking ball anytime soon, which is no surprise but still depressing.
FWIW, the View From the Wing report appears to be
#20
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,884
Seems multi-quote is still not working...
OP, I absolutely miss the CDG GFL. The Star Alliance lounge is ok but so crowded. UA's CDG FCL (it was never called a Global First Lounge) was not easy to find, yet very close to the gates, tucked away between the inner and outer walls of the terminal. So quiet, good wines and champagne, I absolutely miss it. But it has been ages.
I also really liked the JFK lounge which was just a quiet haven away from all crowds and noise. And the incredible service there for boarding or IRROPS when it occurred.
I did not know the IAD GFL was closing. The lounge itself is nothing special, but the food and beverage is OK and it is never packed to the gills like the UCs. If GS now only have access to those overcrowded UC's, I will be far less likely to use IAD. This move gets a big thumbs down.
OP, I absolutely miss the CDG GFL. The Star Alliance lounge is ok but so crowded. UA's CDG FCL (it was never called a Global First Lounge) was not easy to find, yet very close to the gates, tucked away between the inner and outer walls of the terminal. So quiet, good wines and champagne, I absolutely miss it. But it has been ages.
I also really liked the JFK lounge which was just a quiet haven away from all crowds and noise. And the incredible service there for boarding or IRROPS when it occurred.
I did not know the IAD GFL was closing. The lounge itself is nothing special, but the food and beverage is OK and it is never packed to the gills like the UCs. If GS now only have access to those overcrowded UC's, I will be far less likely to use IAD. This move gets a big thumbs down.
#21
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: BA
Posts: 609
Seems multi-quote is still not working...
OP, I absolutely miss the CDG GFL. The Star Alliance lounge is ok but so crowded. UA's CDG FCL (it was never called a Global First Lounge) was not easy to find, yet very close to the gates, tucked away between the inner and outer walls of the terminal. So quiet, good wines and champagne, I absolutely miss it. But it has been ages.
I also really liked the JFK lounge which was just a quiet haven away from all crowds and noise. And the incredible service there for boarding or IRROPS when it occurred.
I did not know the IAD GFL was closing. The lounge itself is nothing special, but the food and beverage is OK and it is never packed to the gills like the UCs. If GS now only have access to those overcrowded UC's, I will be far less likely to use IAD. This move gets a big thumbs down.
OP, I absolutely miss the CDG GFL. The Star Alliance lounge is ok but so crowded. UA's CDG FCL (it was never called a Global First Lounge) was not easy to find, yet very close to the gates, tucked away between the inner and outer walls of the terminal. So quiet, good wines and champagne, I absolutely miss it. But it has been ages.
I also really liked the JFK lounge which was just a quiet haven away from all crowds and noise. And the incredible service there for boarding or IRROPS when it occurred.
I did not know the IAD GFL was closing. The lounge itself is nothing special, but the food and beverage is OK and it is never packed to the gills like the UCs. If GS now only have access to those overcrowded UC's, I will be far less likely to use IAD. This move gets a big thumbs down.
#22
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,452
I think what was special about UA back in those days is the real effort to have a separate first lounge as well as so many arrivals lounges available at airports around the US and globe (not to mention the 1K rooms, etc). In that way they helped create a "gold standard." I'd also argue they were exclusive, no status or credit card got one in back in the day, especially the arrivals lounges where not even upgrades allowed use. The IAD lounge is one of the last vestiges of that. IIRC there were First International Lounges back in the day at IAD, LAX, SFO, ORD, JFK, SEA, BOS and many other international airports, all were quiet havens with very nice service.
Today, if United were to roll out a similar product, it would be lambasted as grossly uncompetitive on a global level. A few hundred square feet of dedicated space, some self-pour higher-end booze and a modest food service wouldn't cut it in an era where competitors are investing massively in their respective products, not just in capital but also on the basis of operating cost.
Case in point, the Polaris Lounge, the best lounge product United has ever offered, is decidedly a business class-caliber product (though a very, very good one).
#23
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,884
I think what was special about UA back in those days is the real effort to have a separate first lounge as well as so many arrivals lounges available at airports around the US and globe (not to mention the 1K rooms, etc). In that way they helped create a "gold standard." I'd also argue they were exclusive, no status or credit card got one in back in the day, especially the arrivals lounges where not even upgrades allowed use. The IAD lounge is one of the last vestiges of that. IIRC there were First International Lounges back in the day at IAD, LAX, SFO, ORD, JFK, SEA, BOS and many other international airports, all were quiet havens with very nice service.
#24
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: BA
Posts: 609
Internationally, I remember IFL (and some separate Arrivals Suite) at CDG, FRA, SYD, GRU, HKG, NRT, LHR. I dont recall EWR, MEX or HNL? Were there other locations as well? Which was your favorite? I seem to recall a butler in the LHR lounge but nobody commented on this to confirm.
#25
Join Date: Feb 2015
Programs: united
Posts: 1,636
Well, we the flying public voted with our dollars. First Class is only profitable if it isn't filled with upgrading FF'ers and enough people are paying a premium for it. But after lie-flats came to business people weren't interested in paying that premium anymore.
The focus of FF'ers should be to get upgraded standard lounges. Bigger UC's (and Admirals Clubs, etc.) with more food, drinks, bring the showers back, etc. Because it looks like the Global First product is dead outside of a few subsidized foreign carriers.
The focus of FF'ers should be to get upgraded standard lounges. Bigger UC's (and Admirals Clubs, etc.) with more food, drinks, bring the showers back, etc. Because it looks like the Global First product is dead outside of a few subsidized foreign carriers.
#26
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,115
Internationally, I remember IFL (and some separate Arrivals Suite) at CDG, FRA, SYD, GRU, HKG, NRT, LHR. I dont recall EWR, MEX or HNL? Were there other locations as well? Which was your favorite? I seem to recall a butler in the LHR lounge but nobody commented on this to confirm.
#27
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago
Programs: UA GS 1MM, CM PP
Posts: 689
Having visited the ORD and SFO Polaris lounges on multiple occasions, I do miss aspects of the GFLs. While Polaris lounges are better designed and more up to date, there was more of a sense of exclusivity and relative privacy the older lounges. Also much better, more personalized service. Beyond cutting three-class international service, this has been a big hit to the value of the GS program, as we've lost that exclusive perk now too (using the GFL while traveling in Biz). I also miss the self-serve drinks of the GFLs.
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 19,506
#29
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SYD
Programs: UA GS, BA Gold, Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, IHG Gold, National Exec Elite, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,419
I went to the SFO Polaris lounge twice in the last week and was blown away. Best business lounge I have ever been to.
I don't miss the UA First lounges at all.
I don't miss the UA First lounges at all.
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
I've been to both the GFLs in SFO and ORD, I wasn't terribly impressed.
GF was a great product when the other prospect was barcoloungers in C, and the F lounges were fine and quiet, but its not like they had much of a spread. Aside from snootiness, I don't see how (many more people) people are worse off once they get the polaris' up and running.
GF was a great product when the other prospect was barcoloungers in C, and the F lounges were fine and quiet, but its not like they had much of a spread. Aside from snootiness, I don't see how (many more people) people are worse off once they get the polaris' up and running.