Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA award booking,change questions/fees/issues/routing/excursionist problems {Archive}

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Dec 27, 2016, 9:23 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
United's Announcement and FAQ

Kacee's Interpretation

Main Impact Since October 6
  • Fee Changes such as platinum members are subject to various award fees
  • No more free stopover - replaced with Excursionist Perk
  • Agents no longer have the ability to find routings that do not show up on united.com
  • Manually constructing trips using multi-city search results in multiple award fares being charged
  • Changing any segment MIGHT require current availability for all existing Os&Ds in the PNR (as if a brand new booking is made) - YMMV
  • Singapore Airlines segments are priced separately (add-ons)

Useful Links
This is an archive thread, the active thread is Award booking questions/ issues/ routing/ excursionist problems / help
Print Wikipost

UA award booking,change questions/fees/issues/routing/excursionist problems {Archive}

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2016, 7:40 am
  #886  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,018
Originally Posted by EsquireFlyer
Arghh this "new system" is so frustrating! Agents keep being unable to book specific segments with inventory available (even non-married inventory) and only being able to book (or saying they are only able to book) specific routing sets that "the computer" offers them. Which is frustrating on a routing like NYC-SIN where the computer keeps suggesting routings on Air China with long connections in PEK (ugh that airport) when space is available on TG/LH via Europe. And the computer happily suggests SOME TG/LH routings through Europe, but coincidentally only the segments that don't have F space, so the computer only offers the Y awards..while not listing the segments that do have F space unless you do a segment-by-segment separate search.
I went through this last couple weeks.
In the end I managed to get home. However, I could have gotten better flight schedules in the "previous" system.
ft4lyf is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2016, 7:59 am
  #887  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SRQ, PDX
Programs: UA 1 MM, AA, DL
Posts: 930
Originally Posted by ft4lyf
I went through this last couple weeks.
In the end I managed to get home. However, I could have gotten better flight schedules in the "previous" system.
Me too. Booked OW to HKG (before the change) via VIE but couldn't get back (after the change) via Europe, even after calling. Until "another-change-I-don't-like," it was easy to snag good seats via Europe from HKG to USA.
artvandalay is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 3:52 am
  #888  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LIS/AUS
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Gold, Marriott Titanium, TAP Gold
Posts: 263
I'm trying to book a 1-way TXL-FRA-PVG-AKL. When I put in TXL-AKL, there's only economy, but when I look at individual flights, the TXL-FRA-PVG have saver business availability.

Called 1k and they are unable to do ANYTHING. Has anyone been able to get some sort of workaround? This is HORRIBLE
pnt1 is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 6:14 am
  #889  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott/SPG/Hilton Gold, PreCheck + Clear
Posts: 2,306
Originally Posted by pnt1
I'm trying to book a 1-way TXL-FRA-PVG-AKL. When I put in TXL-AKL, there's only economy, but when I look at individual flights, the TXL-FRA-PVG have saver business availability.

Called 1k and they are unable to do ANYTHING. Has anyone been able to get some sort of workaround? This is HORRIBLE
Similar experience here, booking BOS>EWR>TXL tomorrow one-way saver J. I currently have a seven-hour layover, and the agent was very clear that I won't be able to SDC onto a later BOS>EWR feeder flight -- even if there's wide open space in economy -- unless there's also a second saver J seat open on the married TATL segment. In other words, I can't "keep my seat" on the TATL segment and just SDC the first leg, even if I'm willing to sit in the back for the short hop to EWR.

I explained that this made no sense, that there was only one of me, that I didn't see why there needed to be a second open saver J seat for a SDC. She said her hands were tied.

This is starting to sound more and more like a bug.
RandomBaritone is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 7:24 am
  #890  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CLE
Programs: UA GS+LT UC, AA EXP+LT PLT, Fairmont LT PLT, Marriott PLT, Hilton DIA, Hyatt Glob, Avis CHM
Posts: 4,671
It's not a bug. It's a #UnitedUnfriendly feature :-:enhancement:-:

If enough 1K/GS would complain about it maybe we would get somewhere...
ctownflyer is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 7:26 am
  #891  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,018
Originally Posted by RandomBaritone

This is starting to sound more and more like a bug.
I dont think its a bug. I think post October-6th UA changed the functionality of the system used by phone agents. Currently the agents literally see whatever you would see on .bomb (with some exceptions).

However, there are a few agents who are willing to use their previous knowledge and make changes to certain parts of your trip without touching other aspects, etc. These few agents will probably stop doing helpful stuff as soon as their supervisors ding them for doing additional work.
ft4lyf is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 8:15 am
  #892  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: UA:1k; MR: PLT; Hilton: Gold
Posts: 1,324
Originally Posted by RandomBaritone
Similar experience here, booking BOS>EWR>TXL tomorrow one-way saver J. I currently have a seven-hour layover, and the agent was very clear that I won't be able to SDC onto a later BOS>EWR feeder flight -- even if there's wide open space in economy -- unless there's also a second saver J seat open on the married TATL segment. In other words, I can't "keep my seat" on the TATL segment and just SDC the first leg, even if I'm willing to sit in the back for the short hop to EWR.

I explained that this made no sense, that there was only one of me, that I didn't see why there needed to be a second open saver J seat for a SDC. She said her hands were tied.

This is starting to sound more and more like a bug.
Why not just wait list for the later BOS-EWR? Also, if you live reasonably close, I would even consider going to BOS earlier to see if an airport agent can help you. They usually have a lot more latitude.
jmanirish is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 8:28 am
  #893  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,018
Originally Posted by jmanirish
Why not just wait list for the later BOS-EWR? Also, if you live reasonably close, I would even consider going to BOS earlier to see if an airport agent can help you. They usually have a lot more latitude.
In my experience in the past 4 weeks or so, the waitlisting function seems to have gone away. (e.g., waitlist for earlier flight / waitlist for "I" inventory when seated in Y but paid for business).

YMMV.
ft4lyf is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 8:59 am
  #894  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott/SPG/Hilton Gold, PreCheck + Clear
Posts: 2,306
Originally Posted by ft4lyf
I dont think its a bug. I think post October-6th UA changed the functionality of the system used by phone agents. Currently the agents literally see whatever you would see on .bomb (with some exceptions).
I totally get it, and I understand the logic behind the new married segment rules. But it seems that they should be waived for SDCs. It's ludicrous that there needs to be a second open saver J seat on a segment I'm not even touching in order for my SDC of the first segment to go through.

Originally Posted by jmanirish
Why not just wait list for the later BOS-EWR? Also, if you live reasonably close, I would even consider going to BOS earlier to see if an airport agent can help you. They usually have a lot more latitude.
To be clear, I'm trying to change onto a later flight, not an earlier one. I'm trying to shorten my layover at EWR. Getting to BOS even earlier than my current 10:15am departure would sort of defeat the purpose.
RandomBaritone is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 9:45 am
  #895  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: UA:1k; MR: PLT; Hilton: Gold
Posts: 1,324
Originally Posted by ft4lyf
In my experience in the past 4 weeks or so, the waitlisting function seems to have gone away. (e.g., waitlist for earlier flight / waitlist for "I" inventory when seated in Y but paid for business).

YMMV.
Agent's might be having problems, but the ability to waitlist is still explicitly provided on UA's website
MP rules

Originally Posted by RandomBaritone
To be clear, I'm trying to change onto a later flight, not an earlier one. I'm trying to shorten my layover at EWR. Getting to BOS even earlier than my current 10:15am departure would sort of defeat the purpose.
Ya I got that. That's why I said if you live close. As in go to the airport earlier in the day, get an agent there to move you to the later flight, leave, and come back for your now later departure.
jmanirish is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2016, 10:56 am
  #896  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,468
Originally Posted by ctownflyer
If enough 1K/GS would complain about it maybe we would get somewhere...
^^^ Strongly support that !!! ^^^

FWIW, I let UA CS know my serious concerns within days after this change came into effect.

1K and GS: LET UA KNOW !!!

Last edited by goalie; Dec 13, 2016 at 1:05 pm Reason: repaired quote
cesco.g is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2016, 9:27 pm
  #897  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 75
I have a roundtrip from JFK to HKG via FRA.

Previously I was allowed to call in and request a stopover in FRA for no additional mileage. Is this still possible under the new rules?
mjstallion is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2016, 9:46 pm
  #898  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,432
Originally Posted by mjstallion
I have a roundtrip from JFK to HKG via FRA.

Previously I was allowed to call in and request a stopover in FRA for no additional mileage. Is this still possible under the new rules?
No - FRA and HKG are not in the same award region. Therefore the "excursionist perk" does not apply and any stopover will costs more miles. You may be able to get a 23:59 connection but if you perform the award search in multi-city mode (ie JFK-FRA, FRA-HKG) you are still likely to be charged for each portion separately. This, too, is part of the ctober 2016 enhancements.
Xyzzy is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2016, 4:08 pm
  #899  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: UA GS>1K>Nothing; DL DM 2MM; AS 75K>Nothing>MVP
Posts: 9,341
"The cabin of service and award type of the free one-way award is the same or lower than the one-way award preceding it."

Question - Is Standard Economy Award Type lower than Saver First?

Anybody have any experience with this.
5khours is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2016, 4:54 pm
  #900  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: UA:1k; MR: PLT; Hilton: Gold
Posts: 1,324
Originally Posted by 5khours
"The cabin of service and award type of the free one-way award is the same or lower than the one-way award preceding it."

Question - Is Standard Economy Award Type lower than Saver First?

Anybody have any experience with this.
Unequivocally - no. Can't mix standard with saver.
jmanirish is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.