Incorrect Charge After Using Cert
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Incorrect Charge After Using Cert
Bought a ticket for $228.10 - $200 e-cert and was quoted $28.10 add collect. Ticket was issued, and receipt showed $28.10 charged to credit card.
Since this is United, I actually check the charge posting, since I don't trust their post-merger IT, and sure enough the charge posted to my card slightly higher.
Not a huge amount, but in aggregate, they could be making quite a few bucks with this "tens of pennies" approach if they're ripping off others as well.
This same thing happened for 2 pax on 2 separate records. Both had the same incorrect posting.
RECEIPT:
VIXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX on Saturday, January 23, 2016. $28.10 USD per ticket for an additional total of $28.10 USD was collected.
CC POSTING:
01/23/2016 01/25/2016 Sale UNITED $29.03
Credit card is in USD, ticket was bought from united.com's USA site in USD, so it's not an exchange issue.
Anyhow watch your charges...
Since this is United, I actually check the charge posting, since I don't trust their post-merger IT, and sure enough the charge posted to my card slightly higher.
Not a huge amount, but in aggregate, they could be making quite a few bucks with this "tens of pennies" approach if they're ripping off others as well.
This same thing happened for 2 pax on 2 separate records. Both had the same incorrect posting.
RECEIPT:
VIXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX on Saturday, January 23, 2016. $28.10 USD per ticket for an additional total of $28.10 USD was collected.
CC POSTING:
01/23/2016 01/25/2016 Sale UNITED $29.03
Credit card is in USD, ticket was bought from united.com's USA site in USD, so it's not an exchange issue.
Anyhow watch your charges...
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 2MM 1K
Posts: 16,591
Was it a tax/fee thing? Maybe 29.03 was taxes/fees? I'm thinking maybe ETCs can't apply towards taxes/fees? I don't have one available, so I can't look. If so, maybe there's still a buck or so left on ETC?
#3
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Hmm, you can use ETCs on taxes, though. I've used ETCs to cover a whole ticket before.
Maybe it's a bug with base fares that are approaching the cert value.
#4


Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: None - previously UA
Posts: 5,395
#5
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 16,202
Incorrect Charge After Using Cert
Was the charge you are seeing on your CC one that is an pending charge (I.e. Authorization) or an actual posted charge? The two can be different, and oftentimes merchants authorize a higher amount than they actually post the charge for. Just a possibility.
#7
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
#9
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
An additional amount for the difference in fare was charged to VISA VIXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX on Saturday, January 23, 2016. $28.10 USD per ticket for an additional total of $28.10 USD was collected.
#10
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA Plat/1.5MM, AA PltPro, B6 M4 25for25, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 7,333
Have you called UA and ask them to explain? that's usually the first step, if you want to set up a CC dispute.
#11
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
It's 93 cents x 2 pax, I'm not really interested in spending time with UA on it or having UA putz around with it and probably break something else for a couple of bucks. I still need to fly the ticket.
As for a CC dispute, Chase would probably not pursue a dispute that low -- they'd just credit me and move on. So nothing would happen to UA.
Plus, UA would likely not acknowledge the real issue, which we all know, is that their technology hasn't worked since they downgraded to CO's systems back in 2012.
#12




Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: airline nobody; Marriott Gold; IHG Platinum
Posts: 438
It's 93 cents x 2 pax, I'm not really interested in spending time with UA on it or having UA putz around with it and probably break something else for a couple of bucks. I still need to fly the ticket.
As for a CC dispute, Chase would probably not pursue a dispute that low -- they'd just credit me and move on. So nothing would happen to UA.
Plus, UA would likely not acknowledge the real issue, which we all know, is that their technology hasn't worked since they downgraded to CO's systems back in 2012.
As for a CC dispute, Chase would probably not pursue a dispute that low -- they'd just credit me and move on. So nothing would happen to UA.
Plus, UA would likely not acknowledge the real issue, which we all know, is that their technology hasn't worked since they downgraded to CO's systems back in 2012.

#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Splitting time between small towns in NorCal and Wydaho
Programs: Amethyst Premier Plutonium Medallion
Posts: 21,528

i agree, DOT them on the premise of 'post purchase price increase'. making them spend lots of hours on a dispute of $.93 would be especially rewarding.
#15
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Filed a DOT complaint against UA for the overcharge. They left me a voicemail saying that the charge was correct, and the receipt shows the whole ticket price regardless of the form of payment (in other words, they didn't read my letter, detail, and copy of credit card charges I attached).
A couple days later, UA left another voicemail saying that it was an unintentional technical glitch, and they'll refund me the 93 cents x 2 tickets or whatever it was. I wonder if they sent their proposed response to DOT who may have rejected it as not addressing the concern.


