FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   Premium Transcon Service SFO/LAX<>EWR flights - Questions and Experiences (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1719061-premium-transcon-service-sfo-lax-ewr-flights-questions-experiences.html)

Repooc17 Nov 24, 2023 1:45 pm


Originally Posted by UAFAM (Post 35769246)
From what I can remember they served dinner on these red-eye flights, but I just noticed “Snack”, is this a system error or they actually removed the meal from these flights?

You will get a meal.

PTahCha Jan 10, 2024 3:13 pm

Interestingly, they brought back the "free food" language on the premium transcon section of the website. Then again, the amenity kit language is incorrect (or rather, just copy and pasted from the other amenity kit page).

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...2e41b88387.png

Also love the random caveat.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...6058521bee.png




Originally Posted by UAFAM (Post 35769246)
From what I can remember they served dinner on these red-eye flights, but I just noticed “Snack”, is this a system error or they actually removed the meal from these flights?

It's normally snack. However, their current red-eye snack is the same as full meal, as opposed to the reduced offering.

Infinite1K Jan 10, 2024 3:40 pm


Originally Posted by PTahCha (Post 35896897)

Confused by their caveat - are they saying not all flights on EWR-SFO/LAX offer premium transcon service?

Unitedloyalflyer Jan 10, 2024 4:46 pm


Originally Posted by Infinite1K (Post 35897011)
Confused by their caveat - are they saying not all flights on EWR-SFO/LAX offer premium transcon service?

from what has been posted in the meal threads, by some, UA means no routes offer premium transcon service

Repooc17 Jan 10, 2024 6:05 pm

Website is not accurate.

E+ has no meals. E+ has not offered meals for years now.

All flights in business and premium economy cabins will have a plate; quality of the plate notwithstanding.

JerseyCityS Jan 10, 2024 8:38 pm

I am so frustrated right now with UA on these "premium" transcon route. I recently ticket myself on a 777 EWR LAX in April in Premium Economy. A bit later I did a cabin upgrade to First, which is a polaris seat. Within a few days, equipment was changed to a 757. Major difference in the seating. I then did a change to EWR SFO LAX to a 777 on the first leg, and of course, I lost the cabin upgrade fee, as that isn't refundable. My choice. I upgraded a second time to a Polaris seat. Today, open the reservation, and yet another equipment change to a 777 with the ridiculous 2 - 4 - 2 seating. A completely different product. Mind you, my initial purchase was Premium Economy. That does not exist on the lastest equipment change. I lost one upgrade fee, and would have never in a million years chose a 777 with the 2-4-2 seating. I realize things change, but this is a bit much, and I have twice paid a cabin upgrade. They won't budge and allow another change.

Be careful when you think you're getting a polaris equiped aircraft on a transcon. They just won't budge in giving me a break after multiple changes, and I've thrown away almost $1000 in cabin upgrades to a cabin that I"m not flying in. ugh.

PTahCha Jan 11, 2024 7:25 am


Originally Posted by JerseyCityS (Post 35897708)
I am so frustrated right now with UA on these "premium" transcon route. I recently ticket myself on a 777 EWR LAX in April in Premium Economy. A bit later I did a cabin upgrade to First, which is a polaris seat. Within a few days, equipment was changed to a 757. Major difference in the seating. I then did a change to EWR SFO LAX to a 777 on the first leg, and of course, I lost the cabin upgrade fee, as that isn't refundable. My choice. I upgraded a second time to a Polaris seat. Today, open the reservation, and yet another equipment change to a 777 with the ridiculous 2 - 4 - 2 seating. A completely different product. Mind you, my initial purchase was Premium Economy. That does not exist on the lastest equipment change. I lost one upgrade fee, and would have never in a million years chose a 777 with the 2-4-2 seating. I realize things change, but this is a bit much, and I have twice paid a cabin upgrade. They won't budge and allow another change.

Be careful when you think you're getting a polaris equiped aircraft on a transcon. They just won't budge in giving me a break after multiple changes, and I've thrown away almost $1000 in cabin upgrades to a cabin that I"m not flying in. ugh.

You can request a refund for the first upgrade fee.

Confused about throwing away the second upgrade fee - you're cancelling the flight because it's a domestic 777?

JerseyCityS Jan 11, 2024 9:31 am


Originally Posted by PTahCha (Post 35898779)
You can request a refund for the first upgrade fee.

Confused about throwing away the second upgrade fee - you're cancelling the flight because it's a domestic 777?

I'm not going throw away the second upgrade, but I would have never paid for it if I had known the equipment. I did if for the Polaris seat both times. If I had known it would be the 2-4-2 horrible busines class arrangement, I would have never paid the upgrade fee. Actually, I would rather be on a 757 in Y than on this plane. I just think it's awful how UA won't budge in assisting with changes with just a dramatic change in seating options.

abbydancer Jan 11, 2024 3:34 pm


Originally Posted by JerseyCityS (Post 35899241)
I'm not going throw away the second upgrade, but I would have never paid for it if I had known the equipment. I did if for the Polaris seat both times. If I had known it would be the 2-4-2 horrible busines class arrangement, I would have never paid the upgrade fee. Actually, I would rather be on a 757 in Y than on this plane. I just think it's awful how UA won't budge in assisting with changes with just a dramatic change in seating options.

We had a 10am flight on a Premium Economy seat for Newark around Thanksgiving. They downgraded the plane to a 757, and moved us to economy. I was able to get them to move us to a later 777 flight, but not an earlier one the previous day (only center PE seats on the same day). They'd do it but charge us the fare difference.

UAFAM Jan 11, 2024 8:32 pm


Originally Posted by PTahCha (Post 35896897)
It's normally snack. However, their current red-eye snack is the same as full meal, as opposed to the reduced offering.

I would take snack over this:

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...ea4f3e4a4.jpeg

Infinite1K Jan 11, 2024 11:13 pm


Originally Posted by UAFAM (Post 35901180)

What is that?

Repooc17 Jan 11, 2024 11:16 pm


Originally Posted by Infinite1K (Post 35901402)
What is that?

The same sad chicken, polenta, broccoli dish on eastbound flights for years now.

Infinite1K Jan 11, 2024 11:24 pm


Originally Posted by JerseyCityS (Post 35897708)
I am so frustrated right now with UA on these "premium" transcon route. I recently ticket myself on a 777 EWR LAX in April in Premium Economy. A bit later I did a cabin upgrade to First, which is a polaris seat. Within a few days, equipment was changed to a 757. Major difference in the seating. I then did a change to EWR SFO LAX to a 777 on the first leg, and of course, I lost the cabin upgrade fee, as that isn't refundable. My choice. I upgraded a second time to a Polaris seat. Today, open the reservation, and yet another equipment change to a 777 with the ridiculous 2 - 4 - 2 seating. A completely different product. Mind you, my initial purchase was Premium Economy. That does not exist on the lastest equipment change. I lost one upgrade fee, and would have never in a million years chose a 777 with the 2-4-2 seating. I realize things change, but this is a bit much, and I have twice paid a cabin upgrade. They won't budge and allow another change.

Be careful when you think you're getting a polaris equiped aircraft on a transcon. They just won't budge in giving me a break after multiple changes, and I've thrown away almost $1000 in cabin upgrades to a cabin that I"m not flying in. ugh.

Judging by your handle, it sounds like you are based in Jersey, so flying out JFK might not work as well as EWR.

However if you can go with JFK, flying AA is such a better experience.

Seats
AA does have 2-2 configuration, but that will be better than United 752 and 777HD. Even though the seats are similar to 752, since the Airbus has a wider fuselage, the non bulkhead seats have much bigger wedges for the footwell than on UA 752.
Also, it’s not uncommon to get an op-up to AA First in which case the 1-1 configuration is so much more spacious than what you’ll get on United.

Onboard Service
AA catering is better than what United offers. Everything from a proper pre-order (none of this options not being available during pre-order), printed menus, bread basket, entree served seperately and larger portions (even the nuts ramekin is bigger). And AA has the snack basket and pre-landing baked cookies.

Lounges
AA Flagship/Greenwich lounges are much better than United Club. And again if you get the op-up upgrade to First, you can use the Chelsea/Soho lounge at JFK which is arguably better than Polaris Lounges and not as busy.

PTahCha Jan 12, 2024 8:05 am


Originally Posted by UAFAM (Post 35901180)

There is literally a thread complaining about the opposite: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unit...now-snack.html


Originally Posted by Repooc17 (Post 35901408)
The same sad chicken, polenta, broccoli dish on eastbound flights for years now.

They now flip direction every month, but yes the same transcon chicken special that has been ongoing since March 2020. For Jan 2024, chicken/polenta/broccolini combo is on westbound flights.

So if the itinerary crosses over into a different month, you end up with the same meal choices both directions.

Fortunately, they now have additional pre-order options, so hopefully that will provide some relief of serving the same options for almost 4 years.

Kacee Jan 12, 2024 8:07 am


Originally Posted by Infinite1K (Post 35901417)
Judging by your handle, it sounds like you are based in Jersey, so flying out JFK might not work as well as EWR.

Sympathies to those in northern NJ who are basically stuck with UA at EWR.

I haven't flown UA premium t-con since I matched over to AA in late 2019. Good riddance.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:08 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.