Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LAX-LHR advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2014, 6:31 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: LAX
Posts: 50
LAX-LHR advice

Hi all,

I'll be traveling LAX-LHR on 15 Nov, returning on 20 Nov. In doping out an itinerary, my initial thought was to force a routing of LAX-SFO-IAH-LHR to provide some relatively painless EQM, but that might rise some questions, as international travel at my company gets extra scrutiny. So, I'm going with LAX-IAH-LHR. UNLESS, The Wise Ones here have a better recommendation, based on equipment, likelihood of upgrade (I'm a gold, will be plat on the return), or something else I'm missing.

For the return, I'm trying to finagle our company's OTA to provide LHR-FRA-SFO-LAX as an option to get a ride on a 747. Haven't done that in years, and don't know when the opportunity will come again. Again, if there's a better option than LHR-IAH-LAX, I'd love to hear it.

Thanks in advance.
ShagU is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2014, 6:58 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 5280 feet
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 674
I know you want PQM's but its really hard to ignore the nonstop LAX-LHR
harryhood is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2014, 7:19 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,337
the IAH option is cheap because of low taxes and IAH-LHR has a decent C-class product. I'd go w/ this option both ways. On the return if through FRA I'd consider LHR-FRA-IAH (on LH 380)-LAX if in Z or higher
cfischer is online now  
Old Nov 5, 2014, 7:56 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MRY - CNX - TXL
Programs: UA 1K / *G / Marriott PE / Expedia Gold+ / Hertz PC
Posts: 7,058
Originally Posted by ShagU
LAX-IAH-LHR. UNLESS, The Wise Ones here have a better recommendation, based on equipment, likelihood of upgrade (I'm a gold, will be plat on the return), or something else I'm missing.
Regarding upgrades your long flights will have nothing to do with being gold or plat. It would only matter for your domestic flights in the US (LAX-IAH) etc on getting upgraded to first. You'd still be sitting in Economy on the TATL ride.
JVPhoto is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2014, 8:09 pm
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,671
Originally Posted by ShagU
For the return, I'm trying to finagle our company's OTA to provide LHR-FRA-SFO-LAX as an option to get a ride on a 747. Haven't done that in years, and don't know when the opportunity will come again. Again, if there's a better option than LHR-IAH-LAX, I'd love to hear it.
Economy in the UA 744 is generally considered the worst Y class in the mainline fleet, with tight seating, no power, and no AVOD.
Kacee is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2014, 8:21 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,472
Originally Posted by Kacee
Economy in the UA 744 is generally considered the worst Y class in the mainline fleet, with tight seating, no power, and no AVOD.
Although the wifi and streaming device entertainment make for a reasonable compromise. In seat power is desperately needed.
EWR764 is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2014, 8:41 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: DL PM, MR Titanium/LTP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,130
I assume this is not paid J given that you mentioned upgrades. Otherwise NZ is the obvious recommendation for *G direct
Duke787 is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2014, 10:07 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,671
Originally Posted by EWR764
Although the wifi and streaming device entertainment make for a reasonable compromise. In seat power is desperately needed.
The beta is highly unreliable. Really no solution at all at present, IMO.
Kacee is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2014, 1:55 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,232
On the way to LHR, and assuming you are in Economy, you really want to avoid the 747 at all costs. Also, you will be only semi-functional that afternoon in London, so I would recommend a flight that gets there as late as possible - the later you leave, the greater likelihood of more sleep on the plane, so either the n/s, the SFO or the last flight from IAH would work, as long as it's not the 787 which is too cramped.

On the return, again I would avoid the 747 and the 787. I have found changing at IAH to be extremely painful, with massively long lines for Immigration, but I will admit I've not done it since Global Entry started. SFO is variable, with lots of flights arriving at the same time, it's a lottery if yours arrives just ahead of the others or just behind. LAX is pretty good. Going via FRA can be quite painful - the airport there is chaotic with lots of bus gates (a good half of my flights on LH from LHR end up at one), multiple security checks and a labyrinthine layout. Also, it's very prone to fog delays in winter.

Finally, because of the 500 mile minimum, the short hop to or from SFO counts for slightly more than you would otherwise expect.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2014, 2:28 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: variously: PVG, SFO, LHR
Programs: AA ExPlat, UA 1MM Gold, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 1,678
Originally Posted by ShagU
Hi all,

I'll be traveling LAX-LHR on 15 Nov, returning on 20 Nov. In doping out an itinerary, my initial thought was to force a routing of LAX-SFO-IAH-LHR to provide some relatively painless EQM, but that might rise some questions, as international travel at my company gets extra scrutiny. So, I'm going with LAX-IAH-LHR. UNLESS, The Wise Ones here have a better recommendation, based on equipment, likelihood of upgrade (I'm a gold, will be plat on the return), or something else I'm missing.
The most PQMs you could possibly fit in would probably be a LAX-SFO-ORD-IAH-LHR routing, but I'm guessing you want to avoid scrutiny. If so, the LAX-IAH-LHR is your best bet.

For the return, I'm trying to finagle our company's OTA to provide LHR-FRA-SFO-LAX as an option to get a ride on a 747. Haven't done that in years, and don't know when the opportunity will come again. Again, if there's a better option than LHR-IAH-LAX, I'd love to hear it.

Thanks in advance.
Pass on this if you aren't going to be in C. The ordering for Y experiences would probably be:

2 class 767
3 class 777
2 class 777
3 class 767
3 class 747

747 has a low ratio of E+ to E, no power, and flaky on-demand AVOD.
andrewwm is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2014, 8:28 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LAX
Posts: 556
Originally Posted by andrewwm
The most PQMs you could possibly fit in would probably be a LAX-SFO-ORD-IAH-LHR routing, but I'm guessing you want to avoid scrutiny. If so, the LAX-IAH-LHR is your best bet.



Pass on this if you aren't going to be in C. The ordering for Y experiences would probably be:

2 class 767
3 class 777
2 class 777
3 class 767
3 class 747

747 has a low ratio of E+ to E, no power, and flaky on-demand AVOD.
747 still no AVOD? I thought UA has upgrade that. Remember I flew 747 from sfo to pvg couple times
cubachao is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2014, 11:20 am
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 836
Cubachao,

The United 747s have no personal TV's or entertainment. You get terrible Wifi and that's it.
FriscoHeavy is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2014, 11:26 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MP Gold, 1MM, Global Entry
Posts: 470
Originally Posted by lhrsfo
I have found changing at IAH to be extremely painful, with massively long lines for Immigration, but I will admit I've not done it since Global Entry started.
Passport control at IAH is pretty easy with GE but the lines are often still long without it. After that part sometimes you can get in the far right lane after baggage claim with GE, too which can speed up the process. Then, exiting and reentering TSA checkpoint with Pre makes the whole thing pretty smooth. As far as I am concerned, GE is super helpful at most US air ports of entry.
azzurro is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2014, 11:38 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 498
Also I'm 99% sure the 3-class 763 doesn't have AVOD but instead personal TV (i.e. movies are on a loop)... better than the 744, but still.

Honestly the only reason to fly the 744 is if you want wifi (but considering there's no outlets that doesn't do a ton of good). If you'd like outlets and the chance of wifi (but no guarantees) go for 2-class 772's (50% have it right now), the 3-class 772's at least have a few (compared to 1 763 and 0 764 ) but they have a long way to go given the size of the fleet.
wto605 is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2014, 11:43 am
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,671
Originally Posted by azzurro
Passport control at IAH is pretty easy with GE but the lines are often still long without it.
Agreed. So long as you have GE, IAH is IMO the second best UA hub for international arrivals, after SFO.

Originally Posted by wto605
Also I'm 99% sure the 3-class 763 doesn't have AVOD but instead personal TV (i.e. movies are on a loop)...
Correct.
Kacee is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.