Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United Airlines offers up to $100,000 to flight attendants who quit

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

United Airlines offers up to $100,000 to flight attendants who quit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2014, 9:25 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Always on the move
Programs: Something lifetime here and there
Posts: 1,867
Originally Posted by Tsun
There's 15 year of seniority requirement for eligibility, and I'm pretty sure Delta won't be too eager to hire 40+ yo FAs
True. But Skywest would welcome them with open arms....for a lot of reasons....some similar to what is being discussed here.
goingbananas is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 9:54 am
  #62  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 6,021
For our resident FAs, how is this package compared to previous early-outs?
PTahCha is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 10:47 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by channa
It could be the other way around -- they're doing very poorly and want to attribute the poor performance to something.
The third quarter is usually strong, the question will be relative strength. I have not been paying as close attention recently (been swamped) but UAL's guidance (from 7/24) was for +2-4% PRASM with a midpoint of 14.12 c/mi. That is in line with DAL's actual performance so far (Channa knows, but for others, DAL gives monthly results for revenue, UAL does not)

With guidance of CASM being +1-2%, and falling fuel costs, United ought to make more money this quarter than in 2013.

What I don't understand fully though is what expenses will show up where, and also if they are meeting their targets for revenue. There is no data from UAL at this point on these issues, and I can only assume they are in the range they provided as guidence. However, the estimates (which are likely just looking at oil prices at this point and extrapolating from DAL's revenue performance; PRASM +2 in August, +3 in July) have gone up in the last 60 days, and currently show a major profit improvement of about 50% over the showing in 2Q 2013.

Put another way, I seriously doubt that this is being done now to time the expense. I think that management created a very serious problem in labor relations by trying to ram the sCO K down the sUA FAs via layoffs, and it was making getting a joint contract which UAL badly needs harder/impossible. This is a very expensive buy out, and a very good offer, and (hopefully for service and OT) will help them finally get a single FA deal, which in turn will be expensive compared to what Jeff could have gotten in 2011/2012.
spin88 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 10:52 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,697
If we can get a FA to quit, do we get the 100,000 USD?

We could document this with "I QUIT" cards...
LaserSailor is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 10:55 am
  #65  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,116
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
It's $100K gross, not net; net is probably closer to $60K after taxes, I'd guess.
And not all of them are getting $100K. From a post up thread:

"At least 15 years of seniority is required. Lump sum is $4,000 per year of seniority, minimum of $60,000 and maximum of $100,000 (for 25 years or more)."

Cheers.
SkiAdcock is online now  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 10:58 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355
Originally Posted by LaserSailor
If we can get a FA to quit, do we get the 100,000 USD?

We could document this with "I QUIT" cards...
I think that such an enhancement would require reciprocity, with FA's having the opportunity to drive over-entitled elites out of the Mileage Plus program. We'd need red cards with our MP#, ostensibly to document our 'last straw' moment when handed to a FA. But management would actually credit these for a bonus on the early retirement package, encouraging each departing FA to take as many elites as they can with them.
transportprof is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 11:10 am
  #67  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by spin88
The third quarter is usually strong, the question will be relative strength.
Indeed. And there's no Easter Bunny to hop between months in Q3.

That said, there's no way this is a Q3 expense. Q3 ends in 14 days, and they have to give FAs time to think about it, put in for it, and then they can fulfill it. I'm thinking this is a Q4 or even Q1 expense. And those are the bad quarters.

So I think the timing theory is still a contributor to the motivation.
channa is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 11:18 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Programs: UA Plat-2MM, Marriott Life Titanium, Hyatt something
Posts: 1,888
The timing will be over one year ranging from Nov 15, 2014, to Nov 15, 2015, with each separation date determined by UA's choice within that period to balance staffing needs across bases. I doubt there is a very specific expense timing motivation.

Lots more detailed posted yesterday on the AFA site (including the $5-15K cost of pass travel for anyone not retirement eligible):

http://www.unitedafa.org/benefits/early-out/
LAX UA 1K is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 11:29 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Programs: UA 1K 1MM / AA PP, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 949
Originally Posted by LaserSailor
If we can get a FA to quit, do we get the 100,000 USD?

We could document this with "I QUIT" cards...
Originally Posted by transportprof
I think that such an enhancement would require reciprocity, with FA's having the opportunity to drive over-entitled elites out of the Mileage Plus program. We'd need red cards with our MP#, ostensibly to document our 'last straw' moment when handed to a FA. But management would actually credit these for a bonus on the early retirement package, encouraging each departing FA to take as many elites as they can with them.
One key stipulation of this would be the inclusion of a binding agreement to never fly UA or UX metal ever again
Clarkcc1 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 12:18 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kaiserslautern
Programs: UA G 1.9MM, HH Diamond, Global Entry
Posts: 439
Originally Posted by fly18725
If you read the linked document above, it says that employees eligible for retiree medical benefits will receive them, as well as retiree travel privileges. Any pension benefits (Continental employees only) are retained.
Then there is not an incentive for senior (25+ years) sUA FAs to take this. If all they get is medical and a travel pass. Forgoing their pension seems like a crap deal in exchange for 100K in taxable dollars. Of course, I do not know what their pension plan is, it could be purley a 401K that they would retain...

Last edited by spearsba; Sep 16, 2014 at 12:27 pm
spearsba is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 12:22 pm
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok or San Francisco
Programs: United 1k, Marriott Lifetime PE, Former DL Gold, Former SQ Solitaire, HH Gold
Posts: 11,886
Originally Posted by CO_Nonrev_elite
Tax rate on this is 25%
It's income. It's taxed at whatever rate they pay. This will force them into a higher tax bracket. Plus state taxes in their home state. Plus SS if they weren't already maxed out (which they likely weren't). I used to use a "rule of thumb" that any raise, bonus, etc. I would assume I took home roughly half.
Tchiowa is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 12:30 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Programs: UA Plat-2MM, Marriott Life Titanium, Hyatt something
Posts: 1,888
Originally Posted by spearsba
Then there is not an incentive for senior (25+ years) sUA FAs to take this. If all they get is medical and a travel pass. Forgoing their pension seems like a crap deal in exchange for 100K in taxable dollars. Of course, I do not know what therir pension plan is, it could be purley a 401K that they would retain...
My understanding is the early out has no affect on any retirement benefits. sUA pensions were terminated in bankruptcy and taken over by the national Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. in 2005 (with some reductions per the guarantee terms). Since then FAs have had some kind of 401(k).
LAX UA 1K is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 12:43 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: Marriott Platinum, USDM Gold, National Exec Elite, IHG Dumped-now Kettle, SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,787
Originally Posted by channa
The problem is in the airline industry, you start at the bottom when you join. They don't honor pay or seniority or anything when you move employers like they do for those of us in other fields.
Maybe they could ask Delta for a status match?
oldsmoboi is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 1:06 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kaiserslautern
Programs: UA G 1.9MM, HH Diamond, Global Entry
Posts: 439
Originally Posted by LAX UA 1K
My understanding is the early out has no affect on any retirement benefits. sUA pensions were terminated in bankruptcy and taken over by the national Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. in 2005 (with some reductions per the guarantee terms). Since then FAs have had some kind of 401(k).
OK, then it makes sense. I was repsonding to the quote that said only pmCO FAs kept their pension. I did not know that the sUA FAs had lost their pension in bankrupcy.

Then yes, seems to be a house cleaning of +25 year FAs.
spearsba is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 1:19 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle
Programs: United 1K, Alaska MVP 75K, HH Diamond
Posts: 638
The reality of it is few will get the headline grabbing $100k so this offer needs as always to be seen in context and relative terms. At the end of the day without turning this into a them versus us, sUA vs sCO the salient effect is this is a measure that will likely have greatest impact on sUA FA's. With that in mind it's arguable that this in turn is a disguised measure designed to bring about the further Continentalization of United, something I am sure we all have our own thoughts about....
rajsbasi is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.