UA vs Swiss vs Air Canada in Economy
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: TX
Programs: UA 1K, 1.1MM
Posts: 300
UA vs Swiss vs Air Canada in Economy
I'm booking a flight to Zurich in Economy and my options are the following:
Option 1) IAD-ZRH-IAD on United
Option 2) ORD - ZRH on Swiss and ZRH-YYZ on Air Canada (and then off to IAH).
Believe it or not, in the 8 years that I have been flying, all of my 330K BIS miles have been on Continental and United metal.
So, what do you recommend?
A friend might have some extra GPUs. If that is the case, then option 1 would be the best, assuming there is R space. What are the chances of R space on IAD-ZRH and ZRH-IAD? Any experiences?
Option 1) IAD-ZRH-IAD on United
Option 2) ORD - ZRH on Swiss and ZRH-YYZ on Air Canada (and then off to IAH).
Believe it or not, in the 8 years that I have been flying, all of my 330K BIS miles have been on Continental and United metal.
So, what do you recommend?
A friend might have some extra GPUs. If that is the case, then option 1 would be the best, assuming there is R space. What are the chances of R space on IAD-ZRH and ZRH-IAD? Any experiences?
#2
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 812
The answer to this question depends almost entirely on how tall you are. If you're 5'10" or over, E+ on United wins.
Also, I'm not sure if Air Canada uses them on this route, but AC's new and renovated 777s are 10-across in economy with tiny 16.8" wide seats.
Also, I'm not sure if Air Canada uses them on this route, but AC's new and renovated 777s are 10-across in economy with tiny 16.8" wide seats.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: TX
Programs: UA 1K, 1.1MM
Posts: 300
Good point. I take E+ for granted.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,905
I've flown all three of these carriers within the last few months internationally. In fact, on the flight above, I was connecting in ex-India on Swiss. I don't know why - I found the Swiss flight less comfortable, even though it was the same kind of 330 I flew in on AC. AC loses the IFE battle, for sure (though the updated system in the 787 may be better - I haven't tried it. If you're tall and want more legroom, as mentioned, UA is probably the best to go with.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,478
Been on the ZRH-IAD run probably a dozen times over the last couple of years. Overall, upgrade space ex-ZRH has been pretty decent, especially on weekdays MO-TH. This year it even has been ticking up a bit, with the 767-400 operating now the route. There is also a daily 764 ZRH-EWR.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,232
I've done AC and UA fairly often. UA wins because of E+. AC is better in almost every other respect (assuming it's not one of their new 777s or 787s) and rspecially on food, booze and service. But none of these are important enough to trump E+ and nonstop.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,536
I'll choose flights based on leg room any day. I'll put up with crap service and amenities just to get leg / knee room. I'm 6'2'' and go through absolute hell, misery, trauma with my knees jammed tight against a seat for hour upon hour. And if the person in front reclines suddenly, my knees cop it. The person in front also has to put up with my knees in their back.
#9
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: ORD/MKE
Programs: UA General Member, AA Gold, SPG (Bonvoy) Gold; IHG Plat. Ambassador
Posts: 399
If you are going E-, bring a relatively short person I would go with Swiss. UA and AC E- are pretty otugh even being arounf 5'8". Just my 2 cents.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IAD/DCA/BWI
Programs: UA 1K- RCC
Posts: 457
I have flown Swiss A340 in economy and while service is better perhaps than united and better food options, I didn't care for the seat compared to E+. Given you also have a potential GPU upgrade if you buy W or higher, I'd stick with UA. If you had a way to get business class however, in my experience its then Swiss>AC>UA.
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: TX
Programs: UA 1K, 1.1MM
Posts: 300
I have flown Swiss A340 in economy and while service is better perhaps than united and better food options, I didn't care for the seat compared to E+. Given you also have a potential GPU upgrade if you buy W or higher, I'd stick with UA. If you had a way to get business class however, in my experience its then Swiss>AC>UA.
#12
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Former 1KMM now free as UA Gold MM, former HH D, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,123
Seat space (E+) and total travel times would matter to me. I'd also look at IAH-FRA or IAH-MUC to cut down travel time, especially if you can get a GPU.
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: TX
Programs: UA 1K, 1.1MM
Posts: 300
#14
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IAD/DCA/BWI
Programs: UA 1K- RCC
Posts: 457
As far as I know Y or B i believe with the Star Alliance upgrade award but I haven't looked into it lately. Not sure how either would work for upgrade for cash. But I don't think its a viable option really.
#15
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: All of them, UA-Plat, 1MM*G
Posts: 881
Was just on UA B764 IAD-ZRH-IAD and Swiss A340 ZRH-TLV-ZRH. UA flights in Y were far more comfortable than Swiss in Y. The seat is far more comfortable, the IFE is far better. Meals are about equivalent. Further, both UA flights were on time, while both Swiss flights were late, one severely.
On that basis I would select UA, and if you can get E+ on UA, there should be no contest.
On that basis I would select UA, and if you can get E+ on UA, there should be no contest.