Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Using fare rules to maximize number of miles

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Using fare rules to maximize number of miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 9:53 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 7,190
Using fare rules to maximize number of miles

I will have upcoming roudtrip SIN-SFO-SIN trip in September/October. I must fly economy according to company's travel policy and can book any fare class in economy except Y and B.

Question: which fare class would be preferable to maximize number of miles thru the number of connections without significantly affecting price of the ticket? Secondly, what connection airports would be preferable in this case?

Thank you.
invisible is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 10:15 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton GLD, Marriott Plat, NEXUS/GE
Posts: 2,872
UA has consistent routing rules across all of its fare classes, so buying an expensive M fare isn't any advantage to you in terms of earning miles.

If time is not an issue, consider SFO-LAX-HNL-NRT/GUM-HKG-SIN?
FlyerChrisK is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 10:23 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,346
Use hipmunk with the ITA advanced routing language to see how you can maximize connections/miles. For the origin enter "SIN :: ua ua ua ua+" to see flights with a minimum of 3 connections.

Ideally route something like SIN-NRT-GUM-HNL-LAX-SFO for miles.
mduell is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 10:47 pm
  #4  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: WAS
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Nexus, GE
Posts: 2,130
Originally Posted by mduell
Ideally route something like SIN-NRT-GUM-HNL-LAX-SFO for miles.
If I turned in something like that, I think I'd raise a few eyebrows in the travel office.
astroflyer is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 10:58 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 7,190
Originally Posted by astroflyer
If I turned in something like that, I think I'd raise a few eyebrows in the travel office.
Affirmative. I was more hoping to get something like SIN-NRT-IAH-SFO or SIN-NRT-EWR-SFO
invisible is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 8:38 am
  #6  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: WAS
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Nexus, GE
Posts: 2,130
Originally Posted by invisible
Affirmative. I was more hoping to get something like SIN-NRT-IAH-SFO or SIN-NRT-EWR-SFO
You might actually find that one of those combinations, especially the former prices out cheaper that just SIN-NRT-SFO as the NRT-SFO flight can be quite busy.
astroflyer is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 8:47 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: DEN
Programs: United Premier 1K, Marriott Platinum, Frontier, Delta, Hertz Gold, National Emerald Club
Posts: 927
Originally Posted by astroflyer
If I turned in something like that, I think I'd raise a few eyebrows in the travel office.
Ha . . . that's true but you did ask, "Question: which fare class would be preferable to maximize number of miles thru the number of connections without significantly affecting price of the ticket?"

He did try to max out your miles. So, max miles without raising eyebrows.
valor155 is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 9:02 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,346
Originally Posted by invisible
Affirmative. I was more hoping to get something like SIN-NRT-IAH-SFO or SIN-NRT-EWR-SFO
NRT-EWR-SFO is OK, but GUM-HNL-SFO raises eyebrows?
mduell is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 9:37 am
  #9  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: WAS
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Nexus, GE
Posts: 2,130
Originally Posted by mduell
NRT-EWR-SFO is OK, but GUM-HNL-SFO raises eyebrows?
Well, that's a bit silly, but those are major hubs. Connecting in Honolulu and Guam, and Hong Kong on the way to Singapore, just sounds a lot stranger to me. Then again, it doesn't sound all that strange after reading this board.
astroflyer is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 10:02 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,529
Does corporate travel even look at full itineraries? If the price is cheaper, and you're not wasting company time, why is the routing a concern?
aacharya is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 10:17 am
  #11  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium.;UA 1.5MM; UA Lifetime Gold (whoppee); DL Plat
Posts: 2,129
Sometimes I buy the M fare and then upgrade(change the ticket) to a B fare in the 24 hour window so that there is no change fee...IF the B fare is not too expensive...probably outrageous TPAC. Many times, it's cheaper to just buy the miles via Maximizer
boss315 is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 7:50 pm
  #12  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,185
Originally Posted by invisible
....
Question: which fare class would be preferable to maximize number of miles thru the number of connections without significantly affecting price of the ticket? Secondly, what connection airports would be preferable in this case? ....
You would purchase as high as M fare and then worry about the costs of connections?? The fare class is a greater driver of costs then connections.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013 | 5:36 am
  #13  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 7,190
Originally Posted by mduell
NRT-EWR-SFO is OK, but GUM-HNL-SFO raises eyebrows?
We have offices in San Francisco and NY. Going to either of those is quite logical. Going to Guam will definitely raise red flag.

Originally Posted by aacharya
If the price is cheaper, and you're not wasting company time, why is the routing a concern?
Corporate travel policies defy human logic. I once found a routing from SIN to FRA which was twice cheaper comparing to non-stop flight but was told that it was not allowed according to corporate travel policy.

Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
The fare class is a greater driver of costs then connections.
So SIN-SFO with four connections in between on K would be cheaper than SIN-NRT-SFO on W?

Regarding the routing rules - are they individual with every fare?

Last edited by invisible; Aug 17, 2013 at 5:44 am
invisible is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013 | 7:36 am
  #14  
txp
30 Countries Visited
80 Nights
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Texas
Programs: UA, AA, DL, BA, Marriott, Hilton, Accor, Hyatt
Posts: 1,473
The difference between the M fare and the P (discounted first class fare) is always low. For example, on a RT from IAH to EWR, the M fare could be $1400 and the discounted P fare was $1500. For $100 you get to sit in FC *and* you get 50% miles and PQM bonus. Hard to beat.

When you buy the M fare, wait till the ticket is actually issued in M class. Then you can either upgrade online to P or you can call United. If you change within 24 hours, there will be no fees other than the fare difference.

Originally Posted by txp
The difference between the M fare and the P (discounted first class fare) is always low. For example, on a RT from IAH to EWR, the M fare could be $1400 and the discounted P fare was $1500. For $100 you get to sit in FC *and* you get 50% miles and PQM bonus. Hard to beat.

When you buy the M fare, wait till the ticket is actually issued in M class. Then you can either upgrade online to P or you can call United. If you change within 24 hours, there will be no fees other than the fare difference.
OK, just ignore my answer. Did not read question carefully and did not realize this was an int'l flight. This strategy works for domestic flights where differences in M and P fares are small. I will leave this to others who have more experience with int'l market.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Aug 17, 2013 at 12:15 pm Reason: merge
txp is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013 | 8:04 am
  #15  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 7,190
Originally Posted by txp
Did not read question carefully and did not realize this was an int'l flight.
Yep. SIN-SFO: P - $4866, M - $2649.

Originally Posted by astroflyer
You might actually find that one of those combinations, especially the former prices out cheaper that just SIN-NRT-SFO as the NRT-SFO flight can be quite busy.
Amazing (or not amazing), but SIN-HKG-ORD-EWR with return EWR-NRT-SIN is cheaper than roudtrip SIN-NRT-SFO...

Can anyone explain this?

Code:
Transfer restrictions
  1 TRANSFER PERMITTED IN EACH DIRECTION FREE
      1 FREE IN JAPAN/HONG KONG SAR IN EACH DIRECTION.
  AND - 1 TRANSFER PERMITTED IN EACH DIRECTION FREE
            FREE IN CONTIGUOUS U.S.A. IN EACH DIRECTION
          FARE BREAK SURFACE SECTORS NOT PERMITTED AND
           EMBEDDED SURFACE SECTORS PERMITTED ON THE FARE
           COMPONENT.

Combinability
   DOUBLE OPEN JAWS NOT PERMITTED.
   END-ON-END NOT PERMITTED. SIDE TRIPS PERMITTED.
   APPLICABLE ADD-ON CONSTRUCTION IS ADDRESSED IN
   MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS - CATEGORY 23.
  OPEN JAWS/ROUND TRIPS/CIRCLE TRIPS
    FARES MAY BE COMBINED ON A HALF ROUND TRIP BASIS
    -TO FORM SINGLE OPEN JAWS
    -TO FORM ROUND TRIPS/CIRCLE TRIPS.
   PROVIDED -
     COMBINATIONS ARE WITH ANY FARE FOR CARRIER NH/UA IN
      RULE JS31 IN TARIFF
      IPRP    - BETWEEN THE USA/CANADA-AREA 2/3 VIA PACIFIC
      IPRPC   - BETWEEN AREA 1-AREA 2/3 VIA PACIFIC.
Does above rule mean that in addition to NRT/HKG one more stop is permitted? If yes, where that stop can be? Also, what is 'side trip'?

Last edited by iluv2fly; Aug 17, 2013 at 12:17 pm Reason: merge
invisible is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.