Community
Wiki Posts
Search

A New Low for me in UA service

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2012, 4:05 pm
  #31  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vienna, Austria
Programs: united, delta, british
Posts: 135
Can someone verify that the number is 800 225 8900? That's the number I used (just checked my records) and I don't think (by the unaccented American English) it was someone in India, but I didn't think to ask about that. I was actually in the USA at the time of making the call.
bkcarolina is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 4:09 pm
  #32  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
Originally Posted by bkcarolina
Can someone verify that the number is 800 225 8900? ....
should be just a regular reservations line. Years ago it was for 1Ps but when PMUA when to routing by MP# the specialness of the phone number disappeared.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 5:29 pm
  #33  
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,312
Originally Posted by bkcarolina
Can someone verify that the number is 800 225 8900? That's the number I used (just checked my records) and I don't think (by the unaccented American English) it was someone in India, but I didn't think to ask about that. I was actually in the USA at the time of making the call.
unfortunately there's no more elite desk. Just another enhancement since March 3 that doesn't make a lot of sense to most of us.

A good rule is the one given earlier, if you get a bad agent or one that seems unwilling or unable to assist, politely end the call and call again. Repeat as necessary. Don't stay on any longer than necessary to reach that point.

Some of the replies from my fellow FTers in this thread made me cringe. I hope you treat them the same way you should handle the bad phone agent. (ignore them and move on to the next reply.)

-David
LIH Prem is online now  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 5:48 pm
  #34  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,146
Originally Posted by JNelson113
This is exactly why so many of us PMUA flyers are heartbroken over what is going on. In the past I was well taken care of by UA and had complete faith and trust that they would do right by me. Now I approach each interaction with a wary attitude, cultivated by too many errors on their part and conversations with clueless/unpleasant agents.
IME a lot of PMUA agents want to have our backs but are crippled by the systems and rules they're dealing with now. I have had several very good agents today proactively helping me through irrops... but SHARES has meant each had to spend 15+ minutes on things PMUA did in 30 seconds before. It took two agents 20 minutes to issue me a BP for rerouted flights (after 45 on the phone); another took 15 minutes just to change seats.
exerda is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 7:06 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by exerda
IME a lot of PMUA agents want to have our backs but are crippled by the systems and rules they're dealing with now. I have had several very good agents today proactively helping me through irrops... but SHARES has meant each had to spend 15+ minutes on things PMUA did in 30 seconds before. It took two agents 20 minutes to issue me a BP for rerouted flights (after 45 on the phone); another took 15 minutes just to change seats.
+1

The system and business processes are just so slow to get anything done.

Even if I get things handled the way I want them, the time it takes is so unreasonable, and so much more than with PMUA. I don't even call UA unless I have an hour to kill on an issue (it usually takes less, but there's no such thing as a 5-minute call to resolve anything anymore).

So even with the most helpful, courteous, and compliant staff in the world, sadly, the customer service is still sub-par.
channa is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 7:13 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
Originally Posted by Often1
Rule 1 - When you get an unreasonable CSR, politely thank them, hang up and redial.

That said, all you were owed was transportation IAD-VIE. So long as that's what you got, your contract has been fulfilled.
+1,000,000 It's really best in these cases to politely thank the agent for their time and hang up and call again. It sounds like you got domestic agents who weren't trained to do international flights.
formeraa is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 7:26 pm
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Benicia, California, USA
Programs: AA PLT,AS,UA PP,J6,FB,EY,LH,SQ,HH Dmd,Hyatt Glbl,Marriott Plat,IHG Plat,Accor Gold
Posts: 10,820
Originally Posted by exerda
IME a lot of PMUA agents want to have our backs but are crippled by the systems and rules they're dealing with now. I have had several very good agents today proactively helping me through irrops... but SHARES has meant each had to spend 15+ minutes on things PMUA did in 30 seconds before. It took two agents 20 minutes to issue me a BP for rerouted flights (after 45 on the phone); another took 15 minutes just to change seats.
Originally Posted by channa
+1

The system and business processes are just so slow to get anything done.

Even if I get things handled the way I want them, the time it takes is so unreasonable, and so much more than with PMUA. I don't even call UA unless I have an hour to kill on an issue (it usually takes less, but there's no such thing as a 5-minute call to resolve anything anymore).

So even with the most helpful, courteous, and compliant staff in the world, sadly, the customer service is still sub-par.
+2

And of course, having such a lousy system drives other CSRs to display lousy attitudes, avoid being helpful, etc. I'm not excusing such attitudes and lack of helpfulness - it was not unheard of at pmUA - but it's more likely to happen when they don't know the complicated fix to a formerly simple problem, are daunted by the time it will take to deal with it, are reaching the end of their shift, etc.
Thunderroad is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 10:43 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: bay area, ca
Programs: UA plat, , aa plat, marriott LT titanium
Posts: 4,833
Originally Posted by channa
+1

The system and business processes are just so slow to get anything done.

Even if I get things handled the way I want them, the time it takes is so unreasonable, and so much more than with PMUA. I don't even call UA unless I have an hour to kill on an issue (it usually takes less, but there's no such thing as a 5-minute call to resolve anything anymore).

So even with the most helpful, courteous, and compliant staff in the world, sadly, the customer service is still sub-par.
+1
estnet is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 10:54 pm
  #39  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,146
Of course, having defended the agents who helped me out today, I then came across one who could give the baggage agents at IAD a run for their money in terms of bad service.

At RIC, it seemed like they had only loaded about 1/4 of the plane's bags--funny seeing as how the flight was an hour delayed out of ORD; I guess they rushed it out of ORD. My bag only needed to go 4 gates over, but it didn't make it.

I get in line at the claim office and also get on the phone to the baggage service folks. Agent loudly tells me to "get out of the window" (??) and "step out of line if I am going to be on the phone." HUH?! I'm trying to avoid a possible lengthy wait and at least get the process rolling. She then lectures that it doesn't matter if we call, but that only the local office (her) can enter the claim.

Needless to say, I got my info to the phone agent and stormed out of the airport rather than wait around another hour with such a surly employee.
exerda is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 11:13 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NorCal
Programs: MP Ag, former 1K
Posts: 479
Originally Posted by mikew99
As a customer of UA, I find it very depressing to read more and more stories like this.

So UA makes a unilateral change without telling the customer and then accuses the customer of having made a change, and refuses to help any further. Short of a lawsuit, is there anything that we can do to force UA to help fix the situation?

Doesn't anyone at UA give a d*mn anymore?
I am happy to report a positive experience with a UA agent today - someone named "Cathy".

I didn't get her full name, but here's what happened.

1. I had a cancelled ticket with some value above the $150 change fee that I wanted to use. I tried to change it on the web site which wouldn't let me so what I needed to do, so I had to call.

2. I called the "1K line". To my surprise, "Cathy" answered "1K desk, how may I help you?"

3. I already had my new itinerary picked out, with the exact class, time, routing, etc. all figured out, so no complicated decision process on my part to hold up the call.

4. It was quite clear from the call that "Cathy" was professional, experienced, and knew what the heck she was talking about. The only thing that was holding up the reservation process was her computer. She occasionally let it slip that she was having a difficult time wrangling with the computer.

5. After some baiting about SHARES from me, she did tell me that if I ever visited Chicago, she would find a few of the PMUA agents crying over their computers.

6. After I got my tickets sorted out, I asked her to handle another lingering issue with some tickets that I had purchased for my brother-in-law's family vacation. "Cathy" couldn't fix that mess, but she researched the issue, then came back and explained clearly what the issues were, and why the 4 previous agents I had spoken to on the phone previously on the topic couldn't fix the issue. (3 of those 4 were completely clueless and useless)

7. After I hung up the phone, I was quite happy that at least I got someone that cared, and United's customer service wasn't completely dead yet. However, I was also a bit sad that I couldn't get someone like Cathy on the customer service line every time.
davewang202 is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2012, 11:23 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: 1P, AA EXP, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,491
Originally Posted by Thunderroad
As for your second point, the contract technically might have been fulfilled but the customer service was atrocious. UA had it in its power to make this right. It couldn't be bothered to do so.
100% correct.
SFOTurtle is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2012, 3:17 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: UA 1K 3.01MM Hyatt Globalist (Lifetime) AA ExPlat (real), Lifetime UniClub (not from the 2MM).
Posts: 173
Originally Posted by Jorgen
But did you try phoning up again to see if you could get a more reasonable agent?

The real problem in this whole dealio, as far as I'm concerned, is United's habit of changing itineraries without even bothering to send out an email about it. Seriously, United, you can email me sixteen pieces of advertising per week but can't be bothered to mention "oh btw we cancelled your flight and you're now flying on the redeye via Adis Ababa"?
Actually, to me the real problem is that if you call three times you will get three different sets of responses.

Mind you I've had an uphill battle arguing that last point on here before; apparently the average flyertalker checks their itineraries three times a day, just for fun. (Aw, who am I kidding? I do it too!)
I am really lucky that I have not had this issue yet, as I never check my itinerary.
majortom is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2012, 9:13 am
  #43  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,146
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
I just wanted to remind Mike that FT is a small community with (11) vocal members. Getting 'depressed' about the state of UA because of comments you read on FT is really not the way to react to what you read here.
Oh, I think it goes a bit beyond "11 vocal members of FT."

I'm hearing negative comments from all sorts of pax standing in line to board, at check-in, onboard, etc., and surely they're not all FTers, unless FT is a much larger community than thought.

But to me, more depressing is my personal experience that service seems to be at best holding steady and at worst sliding back--we should really be seeing improvements by now. Either I'm incredibly unlucky, or there are still some serious issues UA needs to confront.
exerda is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2012, 9:15 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ORF
Posts: 1,740
Originally Posted by exerda
Oh, I think it goes a bit beyond "11 vocal members of FT."

I'm hearing negative comments from all sorts of pax standing in line to board, at check-in, onboard, etc., and surely they're not all FTers, unless FT is a much larger community than thought.

But to me, more depressing is my personal experience that service seems to be at best holding steady and at worst sliding back--we should really be seeing improvements by now. Either I'm incredibly unlucky, or there are still some serious issues UA needs to confront.
I agree. I hear it from my fellow travelers, see it all over Facebook, in the news, etc...
gegarrenton is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2012, 10:22 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by exerda
Oh, I think it goes a bit beyond "11 vocal members of FT."

I'm hearing negative comments from all sorts of pax standing in line to board, at check-in, onboard, etc., and surely they're not all FTers, unless FT is a much larger community than thought.

But to me, more depressing is my personal experience that service seems to be at best holding steady and at worst sliding back--we should really be seeing improvements by now. Either I'm incredibly unlucky, or there are still some serious issues UA needs to confront.
I added the (11) to my post with a later edit.

Just trying to be funny, and to keep alive the reference to the so called 'Gang of 11'.

My service with UA continues to be 'acceptable'. Definitely room for improvement. But I expect 'acceptable', and am satisifed with what I am receiving.
LarkSFO is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.