Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"There is no longer a dedicated 1K line"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2012, 3:56 pm
  #151  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 522
United should just call it what it is. The "Premier Line" that also takes 1K calls.

This whole "1K 1Call dedicated line" is BS.

Dedicated means: wholly committed to something, set apart or reserved for a specific use or purpose.

If the agents take calls from all elites, then it's not a Dedicated 1K Line.
TIMOS is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 3:57 pm
  #152  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: UAL 1K, Starwood Platinum
Posts: 348
Originally Posted by sbm12
Thanks for the rant. And the personal attack. And for not answering the question posed.

What is the "special" treatment that demands a dedicated group in the call center?

This is what I see as the problem. :-:



But what is special about the way you're treated?

That the call is answered with minimal hold time is certainly something I value. And I cannot argue that it shouldn't continue that way. Having a competent agent who understands the rules is important to me, too, but I cannot pick any group of customers who shouldn't have that.

What's the "special" in the treatment you're looking for?
what is "special" and what Iahve come to like and expect is that the agent can address my need and/or request with minimal time. The new line is unable to do so and in fact, are not able to comprehend the context of the english language. They also have no clue about their own processes or rules, be it a ticket, or a lost bag. what i expect is 1K 1Call...not 1K 20calls
jacroweORD is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 3:58 pm
  #153  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Programs: AA EXP, UA former 1K (1.9MM and gone), Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Diamond, SPG Plat
Posts: 1,111
Originally Posted by FC ORD
The first half has been my experience, and the agents I've spoken with (about 4 or 5 since 3/3) have all been terrific. One told me that she is there for the GS, but if no GS is calling, then other elites will automatically route to her.

As a former labor productivity consultant, I have no problen with that as it keeps her busy and reduces the workload of (or need for) additional agents.
Good way to guarantee that a GS will almost never have the call answered immediately. As soon as one of these "GS agents" becomes free, he either gets a GS from the queue who's already been waiting or, more likely, anyone else in the queue.
NiceLanding is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 3:59 pm
  #154  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: IAD
Programs: United, AA, Hilton
Posts: 340
Most of the agents I have dealt with have been PMCO, they have all been a disaster. More changes I will like. I wonder how long PMUA workers will stick around.
soccerguy985 is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 3:59 pm
  #155  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,866
Originally Posted by TIMOS
If the agents take calls from all elites, then it's not a Dedicated 1K Line.
And what's wrong with that?. If the agents that answer the phone are just as competent as the ones before 3/3, and 1K calls are only routed to this group of agents, how is this a bad thing?
unavaca is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 4:03 pm
  #156  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Programs: AA EXP, UA former 1K (1.9MM and gone), Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Diamond, SPG Plat
Posts: 1,111
Originally Posted by unavaca
And what's wrong with that?. If the agents that answer the phone are just as competent as the ones before 3/3, and 1K calls are only routed to this group of agents, how is this a bad thing?
And if SHARES worked just as well as PMUA's system, why would it matter if they switched? And if GM's were treated just as well as 1K's used to be, why should 1K's care?
NiceLanding is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 4:05 pm
  #157  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,855
Originally Posted by ualvet
Good way to guarantee that a GS will almost never have the call answered immediately. As soon as one of these "GS agents" becomes free, he either gets a GS from the queue who's already been waiting or, more likely, anyone else in the queue.
this can be easily handled by requiring a min reserve level of free agents and only taking other calls only when the reserve is exceeded.

Say you have 50 GS agent available at one time. You can hold out x number of agents (say 5) as the minimum available before some are used to service other levels. This can be dynamically monitored and adjusted depending on call levels... It is called queuing optimization.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 4:13 pm
  #158  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,324
Originally Posted by sbm12
OK...so if there is an outsourced call center elites shouldn't be pushed there. I know of at least a few people who like calling the ICC to engage in shenanigans thanks to relatively loose abilities to understand world geography, but let's go with it for now. My understanding is that all elite calls are now being handled on-shore; at least they're supposed to be. That's actually an upgrade from the sUA approach as I understand it, right?

I'll even go so far as to agree that if the call volumes are too high the lower elite tiers should be the first to get shunted to the overflow systems.

But I still haven't heard a reasoned claim as to what special handling 1Ks require over other customers, elite or otherwise.

And there are plenty of on-shore agents who appear to not know the new rules. Pretending that only the off-shore folks suffer from that is sortof like pretending that only the sCO or sUA agents are good or bad. It represents an interesting association with reality IMO.
nonsensicle at best.

Simple answer is there are marginal agents and there are great agents. The latter were choosen for the 1K group. You seem to be beating around the bush I'm guessing in an attempt to explain away this change. Reality is there is no rosy explination - this was a downgrade and another change that nobody (but some Co loyalists who weren't accustomed to the pmua 1k treatment, perhaps) "likes".
tuolumne is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 4:18 pm
  #159  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 522
Originally Posted by unavaca
And what's wrong with that?. If the agents that answer the phone are just as competent as the ones before 3/3, and 1K calls are only routed to this group of agents, how is this a bad thing?
What's wrong with it is that United's own website and marketing materials call it a "1K dedicated line". It's not dedicated. It's shared. So it's a lie.

And the people answering the calls are not competent - as dozens of posts here show.
TIMOS is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 4:33 pm
  #160  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Hyatt GLOB, Marriott Lifetime PLT, UA 1K 1MM.
Posts: 1,728
based off the threads it looks like the service is hit or miss.

personally, i couldn't care less what the heck they name it. premiere line, 1K line, honestly it doesn't matter to me. what matters to me is that the call is answered quickly by someone who can solve my problem. and for me, both pre and post 3/3, that's what my experiences have been (save for one time, which from my experience is an outlier). they could just rename it to "general customer service" and as long as it's quick and efficient, that's fine with me as whether it's a 1K line or not, the net effect is the same. and it looks like i'm in the minority again, but my experience with the premiere line, MPSC, or whatever you call it (i just refer to it as "the 800 number"), has been fine for reservation syncing, GPU applications and flight changes so far.

i don't care if it's dedicated or not and i don't care who answers the phone. i just want my problem solved.
bob_the_d is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 4:35 pm
  #161  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,393
My take away from this thread:

Just as COdbaUA believes that all elites are equal, they also believe that all phone agents are equal, and thus there is no need for a 1K line. At least that's what a few CO apologists would have you believe.

Personally, I would hate to work for a company that believes all of it's employees are equally good. Socialism?
hobo13 is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 4:40 pm
  #162  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: RDU
Programs: UA Plat 2MM, Delta Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott cardboard
Posts: 1,699
My post 3/3 calls to the 1K line were answered pretty rapidly by an US-based agent who understood my problem and solved it. So far, my experiences have been ok. It will not be OK at all if I consistently wind up with a PMUA off-shore call center, where I have never gotten decent service (and we all go there if the weather is bad at ORD and every agent worldwide is backed up).

It's pretty clear from reading this thread that I've been lucky. As a nobody on DL and AA, I also get agents who understand my problem and can fix things, I just sit on hold for a while.

I flew PMCO only a few times, but whenever I needed to call them, I got somebody who could help. I think PMUA call centers were the worst unless you were 1P or higher.
dulcamara is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 5:43 pm
  #163  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,866
Originally Posted by ualvet
And if SHARES worked just as well as PMUA's system, why would it matter if they switched? And if GM's were treated just as well as 1K's used to be, why should 1K's care?
So it sounds like you have a problem with not being special, even if the quality of service is the same. It's clear that the same PMUA 1K agents are there and answering calls. They may be less familiar with the new system as they were with the old system, but they're the same agent and they're handling 1K calls. What's the problem?

Originally Posted by TIMOS
What's wrong with it is that United's own website and marketing materials call it a "1K dedicated line". It's not dedicated. It's shared. So it's a lie.

And the people answering the calls are not competent - as dozens of posts here show.
The phone number is dedicated to 1K members and the load is being serviced by both PMUA 1K agents (which this thread has shown to exist) and PMCO Premier agents.

Again, I fail to see the problem. It's not like you're working with one particular Account Executive (or something) who knows your history. So long as you get someone who can take care of your issue, what's the problem?

As part of the computer switchover, you're going to get PMUA people who are unfamiliar with motions in the new system and PMCO people who are unfamiliar with the 1K carryover rules, but super familiar with the system.

It really does sound like you have no problems with the actual service an agent is providing to you; the problem is that you do not feel special, because other people are able to use "your" 1K agents. Is this wrong?
unavaca is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 5:47 pm
  #164  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,599
Originally Posted by sbm12
My understanding is that all elite calls are now being handled on-shore; at least they're supposed to be. That's actually an upgrade from the sUA approach as I understand it, right?
IME as a 1K at pmUA, I never had a call routed to the ICC.

Originally Posted by sbm12
I'll even go so far as to agree that if the call volumes are too high the lower elite tiers should be the first to get shunted to the overflow systems.

But I still haven't heard a reasoned claim as to what special handling 1Ks require over other customers, elite or otherwise.
That's because you are advancing an erroneous argument. All customers deserve to have their calls handled by knowledgeable CSRs. If, for whatever reason, a company can't afford to ensure that all of their CSR's have the capability to answer most questions without going to a manager/help desk, it is simply common sense to make sure your best customers have the least exposure to the less qualified CSRs. At least is to me, but YMMV.

Originally Posted by soccerguy985
Most of the agents I have dealt with have been PMCO, they have all been a disaster. More changes I will like. I wonder how long PMUA workers will stick around.
I disagree. I have worked with some exceptionally qualified pmCO CSRs.
halls120 is offline  
Old May 24, 2012, 5:49 pm
  #165  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 522
So long as you get someone who can take care of your issue, what's the problem?
I can't get someone who can take care of my issue! That's the problem!

Every call to the line for me since 3/3 has been with an agent that can't solve simple problems and issues and offers a pretty low level of service in general. I've prob called about 10 times since 3/3 and 9 of those 10 calls have been a frustrating experience.

Kind of like this http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...light-sir.html

It really does sound like you have no problems with the actual service an agent is providing to you; the problem is that you do not feel special, because other people are able to use "your" 1K agents. Is this wrong?
Yes, you are worng. I have a problem with the hurrendous service I have got on 90% of calls top the premier line since 3/3.
TIMOS is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.