Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Why do some names show up on the checked-in upgrade list prior to T-24?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why do some names show up on the checked-in upgrade list prior to T-24?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2012, 7:01 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 3,236
A couple years ago, I arrived DFW and was returning from there the next afternoon on a flight departing 25 hours later. The GA was able to print my BP then. Unfortunately this took me off the upgrade list, and I was unable to get back on it until I got to the airport the next day (by which time FC was full). So be careful what you wish for.....
tarheelnj is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2012, 7:56 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Illinois.
Programs: Switched from UA 1K to AA so I could earn EQD's on partners. Mid-tier on most major hotel programs.
Posts: 542
Originally Posted by BigPoppaCO
To each his/her own but that's insanity
I agree it seems a bit over the top if you're in Boston, but perhaps not if you're somewhat in the middle of NY and Boston. I'm sure some people view mileage runs as insanity as well! (flying more just so you can fly better in the future)
100countrygoal is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2012, 2:04 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
Originally Posted by aacharya
Spoken like a true 1K who probably makes 1K easily.
For some, flying is just part of the job, and they have better things to do than spend a lot of time trying to figure out how to get to the next-higher elite level. For others, we see extra segments as opportunities to get more 500 mile minimums and maybe avoid heroic end-of-year efforts to hit our mileage target. Back in the day (hard to believe it was just a year ago?) there were enough things going wrong that another advantage to adding segments was the opportunity to collect quite a few e-certs.

What doesn't make sense, at least not until we see how things play out, is for a 2P to add segments so they have a couple hours head start at those last E+ seats on the plane. If they exist at all. It could be that those extra couple hours might give you a choice between middle seat row 7 and middle seat row 13 in E+. Or maybe a better seat in the back of the bus if someone else got upgraded. Or nothing at all.

The OP has to consider whether heroic efforts to make the best of 2P might not be worthwhile in the long run. The airlines aren't doing much for the 25k flyer to keep them happy; in the long run, Kayaking might be the best way to go. The good old days for the lowly2P, complete with e500s, are quite assuredly and very sadly gone. Time spent trying to game the system to optimize at the 2P level might be better spent elsewhere.

My daughter, as of March 3rd a former 2P, understands this but hasn't really come to terms with it. She still sees United as "her" airline but United doesn't really see her as a customer worth keeping. It's business, I get that, but if you're anything less than *G material, it's sad. And, I think, short-sighted.
Mike Jacoubowsky is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2012, 6:46 am
  #19  
bpe
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Japan/Thailand
Programs: AS, UA
Posts: 1,201
Originally Posted by joshwex90
LY allows you to check-in from 27 hours out, and they have ex-USA flights, so I don't think it can be a TSA thing.
Cathay Pacific (ex-USA included) lets you check in 48 hours in advance. However, they don't let you check in for all sectors at once, only those that are within 48 hours.
bpe is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2012, 7:00 am
  #20  
skj
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: IAH
Programs: UA 2MM, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,166
Originally Posted by eyuro
CO website check in always gives you the option to check in your return flight when you check in the outbound.
As I understand it, the CO web site allows you to choose to automatically check-in 24 hours before your return flight when you check-in for the outbound. You're not actually checked-in until T-24.
skj is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2012, 8:15 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lawrence, MA USA
Programs: Delta Gold
Posts: 273
Originally Posted by clublounger
Adding a stop, and total travel time, for a better chance at a few inches, doesn't seem like the best trade-off. The few extra miles still doesn't seem worth it, to me.
Actually, there are fewer and fewer non-stop transcon options nowadays (and they can be pricier, which my clients won't always pay for).

I was mostly thinking that it would make more sense to look for connections in JFK/LGA/EWR instead of the standard ORD/DEN/etc, so you have a chance to spend the majority of the trip in E+.
alanstar is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2014, 9:54 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC suburbs
Programs: UA LT Gold (BIS), AA LT Plat (CC SUBs & BD), Hilton Dia (CC), Hyatt Glob (BIB), et. al.
Posts: 3,308
Thought I would resurrect this thread. I'm flying tomorrow from SLC (28 hrs from right now) connecting in IAH (33 hrs from right now). I cannot check-in on-line yet. 4 people are already checked in for the SLC flight and 2 for the IAH flight. I've never seen a United option to check-in for return flights at the time of check-in for outbound flights and I wouldn't think SLC is a common connecting city on UA. Understand that the IAH chech-ins might be connecting (with a 30 hr connection time) but curious how the SLC pax have been able to check in. Thank you.
Dr Jabadski is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2014, 10:07 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN (MSP)
Programs: DL DM, UA 1K MM, Subway Club Member
Posts: 1,988
Originally Posted by Dr Jabadski
Thought I would resurrect this thread. I'm flying tomorrow from SLC (28 hrs from right now) connecting in IAH (33 hrs from right now). I cannot check-in on-line yet. 4 people are already checked in for the SLC flight and 2 for the IAH flight. I've never seen a United option to check-in for return flights at the time of check-in for outbound flights and I wouldn't think SLC is a common connecting city on UA. Understand that the IAH chech-ins might be connecting (with a 30 hr connection time) but curious how the SLC pax have been able to check in. Thank you.
What is your source for the number of people checked in? Are you talking about first and using the website? If so, it doesn't look like anyone is checked in for the 10:45am or 12:45 flights in first.
kenn0223 is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2014, 3:48 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC suburbs
Programs: UA LT Gold (BIS), AA LT Plat (CC SUBs & BD), Hilton Dia (CC), Hyatt Glob (BIB), et. al.
Posts: 3,308
Hi kenn0223, thanks. United mobile site, flight status page, indicated 4 people checked in and upgraded to first and the notation: "This list only includes upgrade-eligible customers who have checked in for this flight". Perhaps those 4 had their CPUs clear prior to 24 hrs and had NOT actually checked in yet? Now, 21 hrs from flight time, the same page shows 7 checked in and upgraded to first and 12 on the upgrade wait list.

Last edited by Dr Jabadski; Feb 5, 2014 at 6:35 pm
Dr Jabadski is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2014, 8:56 am
  #25  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by Dr Jabadski
Hi kenn0223, thanks. United mobile site, flight status page, indicated 4 people checked in and upgraded to first and the notation: "This list only includes upgrade-eligible customers who have checked in for this flight". Perhaps those 4 had their CPUs clear prior to 24 hrs and had NOT actually checked in yet? Now, 21 hrs from flight time, the same page shows 7 checked in and upgraded to first and 12 on the upgrade wait list.
The "checked in before T-24hrs" of one's own flight as noted above, is for those on in-bound connecting flights but the mobile app will show those who have cleared the upgrade list but have not checked-in as I am upgraded for my flights on Friday night and Saturday and I show on the cleared list but check-in isn't until 22:30 tonight. Now as to the showing names on the waitlist on the app at greater than t-24hrs, I can only guess that they are also connecting pax who have checked-in for their inbound flight (but then again, we're talking about COdbaUA's I/T here so it's anyone's guess )
goalie is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2014, 11:28 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC suburbs
Programs: UA LT Gold (BIS), AA LT Plat (CC SUBs & BD), Hilton Dia (CC), Hyatt Glob (BIB), et. al.
Posts: 3,308
Correct, my bad, my apologies. The list to the left of the page is for those upgraded to United First, regardless of check-in status. The list to the right is those who have checked-in who are on the upgrade wait list. The asterisk and the notation I quoted above applies only to the list on the left. I'm traveling and using my iPad vice a PC and I didn't read things carefully enough. Thanks again to kenn0233 and thank you to goalie.
Dr Jabadski is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2014, 11:51 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: LAX,SNA,SAN
Programs: UA GS, Marriott LP, Hertz Gold
Posts: 861
SO if I understand correctly, some folks would take EWR-BOS-LAX or BOS-IAD-SFO as examples just to get a shot at a better E+ seat? Now I do this the segment guy and MR guy doing this because they need a few more miles/segs to make it to the next worthless status but to jump ahead in the queue to select a seat for E+? Wow. The airlines really got us. We have all been fooled for years and the master plan is now working.

As seats get narrower, less recline and harder, these E+ seats will be a premium compared to peasants in the back.

I need to figure out if someone will pay $30 cash for my E+ aisle weekly seat when not UPG. I will make a sign after I board first with my 2 pieces of luggage that will state that my E+ seat is for sale for $30. Are E+ seats really that high of a demand for the people back in steerage?
ZZYZXROAD is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2015, 8:35 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 355
why do I frequently see people checked-in online 48 to 72 hours before flight time?

Isn't OLCI only open at T-24? why do I frequently see people checked-in
online 48 to 72 hours before flight time? (as shown in the upgrade list
under flight status) I've seen names on the upgrade standby list 48 to
72 hours before the flight actually takes off.... usually just 3 or 4 names,
but I thought names only show up for people who have already checked
in online. (not the people whose upgrade had already cleared)
AppleApe is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2015, 8:46 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NYC / MIA / AMS
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 501
Well I don't know for sure but it can be common with long international itineraries. Especially with Dateline changes.

E.g. On wednesday I'm flying EWR-FRA-BKK-CMB, My BKK-CMB flight departs >40 hours after my first flight.
oblisk is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2015, 8:48 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 553
These people probably have multiple flights for a given leg in their itinerary.

So if you are going from AAA -> BBB on flight 1 and BBB -> CCC on flight 2 (and there isn't a stopover), when you check in for flight 1, you'll be checked in for flight 2. You can have a very long layover between flights (even an overnight stay, but < 24 hours between flights), which is why you may see people checked in T-48 on a flight. I don't think I've seen people at T-72, but I guess it's possible to have several segments with very long layovers in between.

You may see some people on the upgrade list earlier if they requested upgrades with instruments (which can be done before OLCI).
windhund is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.