Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Europe > U.K. and Ireland
Reload this Page >

UK PM to get his own RAF transport?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UK PM to get his own RAF transport?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2015, 12:02 am
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
UK PM to get his own RAF transport?

I must admit, converting an A330 Voyager to a VIP transport is probably not a bad idea. Fewer BA charters then.

Full story here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/poli...ted-plane.html

(Obviously not what Blair was hoping for!)
LondonElite is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 12:19 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: East Anglia, England
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 2,056
I suspect the £10 million it is going to be hard sale considering the autumn statement next week.

I never disagreed with 'Blair Force 1' and this proposed option seems more sensible.

H
Hoch is online now  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 12:25 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
What happened when BA did not have an aircraft for Charter?

Didn't Blair charter a Concorde once?
Worcester is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 12:40 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,507
It would be a hoot to "RAF One" refueling AF One, with Cameron waving from the boom operator's window.
IceTrojan is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 1:34 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
About time. We are the only major country that doesn't have a dedicated aircraft for its leader. Just keep it to the PM and other senior government figures on official business. No Harriet Harman taking it on jollies and keep Prince Charles well away.
1010101 is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 1:40 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Wedged somewhere between BTS and VIE ✈
Programs: Star Alliance Gold (A3 Gold), Oneworld Emerald (BA Gold), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,338
Originally Posted by phol
No Harriet Harman taking it on jollies and keep Prince Charles well away.
Charles? I think it's Air Miles Andy who they'll have to watch out for!

Seriously, I think this decision makes sense.
headingwest is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 2:35 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
Originally Posted by phol
We are the only major country that doesn't have a dedicated aircraft for its leader. .
If this Aircraft is for David Cameron or his successor then our leader still won't have a dedicated aircraft aside from the BAe 146 and a Helicopter.

I wonder if Corbyn if he became PM would swallow his principles and fly (especially in a Military aircraft). Would love to see a picture of him in CCR...
Worcester is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 3:01 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: BAEC silver
Posts: 464
Hoch potential savings of £750k pa on a £10m investment makes this a pretty good sell for the Chancellor.
Swampz64 is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 3:14 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
Interestingly the competition to provide the Air to Air refueling aircraft was between the Airbus lead consortium with the converted A330 and a Boeing lead consortium which would have converted old BA 767 aircraft.
Worcester is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 3:15 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by Swampz64
Hoch potential savings of £750k pa on a £10m investment makes this a pretty good sell for the Chancellor.
Yes but it looks bad. "Take away people's benefits to pay for the Prime Minister's private plane". I don't think it will happen.
Calchas is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 3:23 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Quite close to NQY
Programs: BAEC Silver,clubcard,clubcard plus, BA Amex................ And Mucci x3 ;)
Posts: 9,488
Well I think it's about time too

This is well overdue


cs
cornishsimon is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 3:25 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salisbury Plain
Programs: BA: Silver,
Posts: 1,197
Originally Posted by Worcester
If this Aircraft is for David Cameron or his successor then our leader still won't have a dedicated aircraft aside from the BAe 146 and a Helicopter.

...
Yup, the BAe 126 fleet (Queen's Flight???) is available to Royal Family, senior military bods and Government officials. I presume that includes PM.

Diferent tack, I remember a Hercules C-130 being fitted out with a 'cabin' inside to take Maggie down the the Falklands.
onaswan is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 4:16 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Ex-BA Gold, now no status at all!
Posts: 357
Originally Posted by Swampz64
Hoch potential savings of £750k pa on a £10m investment makes this a pretty good sell for the Chancellor.
Especially if you ignore any running costs, which this article does.

I don't have strong views on this either way, but it does p!ss me off how politicians of all shades and the media will gloss over significant aspects of any argument and hope they don't get called on it.
bulkhead is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 4:38 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by bulkhead
Especially if you ignore any running costs, which this article does.

I don't have strong views on this either way, but it does p!ss me off how politicians of all shades and the media will gloss over significant aspects of any argument and hope they don't get called on it.
^
Calchas is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2015, 4:41 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tokyo
Programs: BA Gold, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by bulkhead
Especially if you ignore any running costs, which this article does.

I don't have strong views on this either way, but it does p!ss me off how politicians of all shades and the media will gloss over significant aspects of any argument and hope they don't get called on it.
I don't see where in the article it is clear that running costs are excluded. It even mentions what the running costs are. The estimated saving is likely to have running costs included albeit an estimate based on previous PM travel plans. That is how business plans work.
Boten is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.