Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Reflections from a TK First-Timer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2023 | 5:18 am
  #1  
Original Poster
In Memoriam
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto - YYZ
Programs: Aeroplan/Hilton Gold/Marriott Bonvoy Titanium/Accor/Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 5,899
Reflections from a TK First-Timer

Incredible on board catering, very hospitable staff, impressive Istanbul airport, and the TK biz lounge which is amongst the worlds best.

Which brings us to the cabin layout and seating on the A330/B777. A330 tolerable for a shortfall medium flight but 7-across on a B777 with antiquated IFE for a 10 hour flight in this day and age is less than stellar. Any plans on refurbishing and modernizing this cabin to industry standard of 4 across?

Would not hesitate to fly on a B787/A350. In spite of the amazing attributes of this airline, not sure that I would go out of my way to book another flight operating with the B777.
TKoos, Sopwith, unclepants and 1 others like this.
ACYYZ/SD is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2023 | 6:01 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,031
Originally Posted by ACYYZ/SD
Incredible on board catering, very hospitable staff, impressive Istanbul airport, and the TK biz lounge which is amongst the worlds best.

Which brings us to the cabin layout and seating on the A330/B777. A330 tolerable for a shortfall medium flight but 7-across on a B777 with antiquated IFE for a 10 hour flight in this day and age is less than stellar. Any plans on refurbishing and modernizing this cabin to industry standard of 4 across?

Would not hesitate to fly on a B787/A350. In spite of the amazing attributes of this airline, not sure that I would go out of my way to book another flight operating with the B777.
I agree 7 across is not acceptable and there isn't any plans for a fleet vice refurbishment as far as I know. Not for the 2-2-2 either (A333/A343).

I do think that the 6 across is very nice when no adjacent occupant. Abundance of space! But it was probably considered outdated by most some time ago I guess.
Alfredbali likes this.
Stil is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2023 | 6:28 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Programs: TK Elite Plus,BAEC GGL,ITA Executive, AFKL Gold,QR Gold,HH Diamond,Bonvoy Gold,ALL Gold
Posts: 14,186
Originally Posted by Stil
I agree 7 across is not acceptable and there isn't any plans for a fleet vice refurbishment as far as I know. Not for the 2-2-2 either (A333/A343).

I do think that the 6 across is very nice when no adjacent occupant. Abundance of space! But it was probably considered outdated by most some time ago I guess.
There were plans of a refurbishment, which was first reported on Executive Traveller ( https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...ess-class-seat ) but no further investment has been made.

Since TK needs the 777's, especially since they would fly some of them to Russia during the summer, as they own a couple of them rather than financial lease; and since the deliveries for 787's are delayed; I don't think we'll see any updates on this soon.
Stil likes this.
ISTFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2023 | 1:25 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Leon, MX
Programs: AA Plat, UA Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 300
While I don't love the privacy issues with the 777 I have had the best sleep on a plane on the TK 777. The amount of space is better than most ME airlines, but the privacy... Best if traveling with partners so you can share side.
Lefly and SFOTraveler1984 like this.
miket is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2023 | 2:42 pm
  #5  
1M
40 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Programs: Turkish Airlines Elite, Flying Blue Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by miket
While I don't love the privacy issues with the 777 I have had the best sleep on a plane on the TK 777. The amount of space is better than most ME airlines, but the privacy... Best if traveling with partners so you can share side.
I couldnt agree more about the sleep. I have flown this type of seat multiple times on overnight flights with TK (as well as LATAM on their 777 before they reconfigured them and Air China on their A330-200).

I simply get much, much better sleep on those seats than I do on any others.
B7474U3 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 5:24 am
  #6  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,884
Originally Posted by B7474U3
I simply get much, much better sleep on those seats than I do on any others.
Absolutely agree.

Folks should really stop reading these bloggers who get excited about 'doors' and other gimmicks while not noticing these coffin seats are bad for sleeping....
TPJ is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 12:47 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 12,781
Yes the 777 are much more spacious, and I did sleep much better on 777 vs 350.

If you check the BA/UA forums you will see some missed the spacious 2 4 2 Business configuration. They looked packed to me when I saw them but apparently some found them very comfortable.
nacho is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 2:18 pm
  #8  
500k
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CDG
Programs: AF/KL Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,552
I don't want to hijack the thread, but I'm planning a trip from Europe to Mexico in Feb 2024 and TK seems to have the best offer. Are you saying that, travelling as a couple, we are likely to get a better night's sleep and a better overall experience on a 777 vs. the 787? (Assuming that TK's aircraft scheduling is reliable this far in advance.)
gojko88 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 2:40 pm
  #9  
1M
40 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Programs: Turkish Airlines Elite, Flying Blue Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by gojko88
I don't want to hijack the thread, but I'm planning a trip from Europe to Mexico in Feb 2024 and TK seems to have the best offer. Are you saying that, travelling as a couple, we are likely to get a better night's sleep and a better overall experience on a 777 vs. the 787? (Assuming that TK's aircraft scheduling is reliable this far in advance.)
My experience is yes for sleeping. Im sure if you worked out the surface area of the 777 bed and the 787 bed you would find that the 777 one is bigger and less claustrophobic (your feet dont go into a cubby hole and there seems to be more space around your head). If you are travelling as a couple you can get the 2 seats by the window so you wont be sitting next to anyone else.

For day flights where you wont be sleeping my view is more mixed. I like the overall feeling of spaciousness of the 777 seats, but I also like that on a 787 you have plenty of storage space, can reach the TV so you dont need to use the fiddly remote control and the TV screen is newer and better quality. I also like that you can recline the seat slight and put your feet up on the ottoman (which you cant on the 777 as it is too far away).

Ive got some flights later in the year to the Far East that are both night flights and Im pleased that theyre on a 777 as Im planning to sleep.
gojko88 and TPJ like this.
B7474U3 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 2:43 pm
  #10  
1M
40 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Programs: Turkish Airlines Elite, Flying Blue Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by nacho
Yes the 777 are much more spacious, and I did sleep much better on 777 vs 350.

If you check the BA/UA forums you will see some missed the spacious 2 4 2 Business configuration. They looked packed to me when I saw them but apparently some found them very comfortable.
Whilst I dont like BAs 2-4-2 configuration, the seats do seem to be very well padded.
B7474U3 is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 5:25 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 12,781
Originally Posted by gojko88
I don't want to hijack the thread, but I'm planning a trip from Europe to Mexico in Feb 2024 and TK seems to have the best offer. Are you saying that, travelling as a couple, we are likely to get a better night's sleep and a better overall experience on a 777 vs. the 787? (Assuming that TK's aircraft scheduling is reliable this far in advance.)
Especially if you are not small. I'm small and short and when I saw my seat on the A350 I was thinking "how can someone bigger than me feel comfortable sleeping in this?"

The new seat looks gorgeous but they are not that comfortable to sleep in. yeah there is a locker but I like the ottoman storage in the old style seats. I stuff my bag in the sleeping pod as it was too big to fit into the locker.

If you are travelling as a couple, definitely go for the 777.
kaspars and gojko88 like this.
nacho is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2023 | 5:41 pm
  #12  
30 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, UA Mileage Plus 1K, AA Executive Plat, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,797
I'm excited for my first TK next week as well on the 789. Booked away from the 330/777, solely on looks inside.
CALMSP is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2023 | 3:14 am
  #13  
500k
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CDG
Programs: AF/KL Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,552
Thanks for the replies, everyone. I am 1.90m and she is 1.84, so we're definitely going for the 777 then
gojko88 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2023 | 7:35 am
  #14  
1M
40 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Programs: Turkish Airlines Elite, Flying Blue Platinum, Accor Platinum
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by gojko88
Thanks for the replies, everyone. I am 1.90m and she is 1.84, so we're definitely going for the 777 then
Youre taller than me at 1.79 so I think youd appreciate the space of the 777 seats. Just dont book row 4 as its missing a window.
gojko88 likes this.
B7474U3 is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2023 | 2:31 am
  #15  
50 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: TK EP, AF Platinum for life, something in Oneworld not worth to mention...
Posts: 1,042
Originally Posted by gojko88
Thanks for the replies, everyone. I am 1.90m and she is 1.84, so we're definitely going for the 777 then
especially if you have broad shoulders... 787 is quite narrow, and seats are hard
kaspars is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.