Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > Trip Reports
Reload this Page >

FlyerTalk Trip Reports Photo Contest!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

FlyerTalk Trip Reports Photo Contest!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2007, 7:18 am
  #91  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Programs: QF Bronze, Velocity
Posts: 1,049
flickr playing up - will repost in a new post.

Last edited by TIMP; Mar 17, 2007 at 7:28 pm Reason: increasing size.
TIMP is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 9:11 am
  #92  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Most excellent photos posted yesterday. The competition is going to be tight ^

Suggestion for the contributors -> The contest rules say

Images may be at most 800 pixels along the largest dimension and a maximum of 200K in size.
This rule is designed to make the entire picture visible on an average sized screen without scrolling and to be kind to our members on lower bandwidth connections.

However! Making the image much smaller than that upper limit also causes the detail to be harder to see and reduces the impact of your picture.

I encourage those who have submitted 400x and 500x sized shots to relink to images closer to, but not exceeding, the 800x maximum allowed by the rules.

Cheers,

Rick
birdstrike is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 11:27 am
  #93  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin, TX -- AA Life Platinum; QF Life Silver; UA Silver
Posts: 5,462
Originally Posted by chexfan
What is that? Like 12 miles???

And THANK YOU for your efforts in making this a reality!
Re: Melilla

Actually it's more like 2 miles. Melilla is a Spanish enclave on the African continent surrounded by Morocco. Ceuta is the other Spanish enclave on the Moroccan side across from Gibraltar.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melilla
hauteboy is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 1:06 pm
  #94  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SFOSJCOAK
Programs: AA-EXP & 1MM+, AS, MR-LTT, HH Gold
Posts: 7,581
Question for birdstrike

Originally Posted by birdstrike
Most excellent photos posted yesterday. The competition is going to be tight ^

Suggestion for the contributors -> The contest rules say

This rule is designed to make the entire picture visible on an average sized screen without scrolling and to be kind to our members on lower bandwidth connections.

However! Making the image much smaller than that upper limit also causes the detail to be harder to see and reduces the impact of your picture.

I encourage those who have submitted 400x and 500x sized shots to relink to images closer to, but not exceeding, the 800x maximum allowed by the rules.

Cheers,

Rick
I tried hard to conform to size rule and do justice to the image. My 2 entries are slightly over, would you suggest I re-size further? Thanks
allset2travel is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 6:37 pm
  #95  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Originally Posted by allset2travel
I tried hard to conform to size rule and do justice to the image. My 2 entries are slightly over, would you suggest I re-size further? Thanks
Just got back to my computer after a day in SF.

allset2travel, your images meet the 800 pixel max dimension requirement.

The folks I was addressing above were those who have posted the small 500x300 pixel images and, to a lesser extent, those who have posted 800x images that are only 85KB in size.

I did go back and look at your pictures. They are oversized in terms of KB by almost 3x. So, in the interests of bandwidth, and to keep the playing field level in terms of JPEG compression artifacts, I would appreciate it if you would recompress your original images to also meet the 200KB requirement.

and you folks with the small pictures - they are really good and need to be upsized ( if the originals allow) to do them justice.
birdstrike is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 7:08 pm
  #96  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: AA EXP "Life is good! Really good.""
Posts: 4,923
Thank you, Birdstrike, for setting up this thread. Technically nice also to use the capabilities of the FT Trip Reports forum. ^ ^

The photos have really livened up FT, and I'm enjoying the fantastic contributions. I wish there were a way to comment/ask questions about the photos and read others responses without cluttering the thread.

The fewer rules the better, and I think you have decided wisely. Not that I'm feeling competitive, and I appreciate your advice to help us upload better photos, but are we aiming for technical expertise or emotion and story telling? Not that they are mutually exclusive.

I'm "defending" my selection of a "you had to have been there" night shot from my first trip to Venice with a $49 Intel digital camera from the swap meet. I may have a larger version somewhere, but it ain't got more detail! and there is no way to correct for camera movement, yet it is my favorite shot of all my Venice photos. For me it's totally evocative of the unexpected you always find in Venice and I wanted to share. So I did. Thanks for the opportunity.

Great job, and a great idea!
lili is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 7:30 pm
  #97  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Programs: QF Bronze, Velocity
Posts: 1,049
Sultan Mosque - Singapore May 2005

TIMP is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 8:09 pm
  #98  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Lili,

Originally Posted by lili
Thank you, Birdstrike, for setting up this thread. Technically nice also to use the capabilities of the FT Trip Reports forum. ^ ^
Thank you for the kind words. If it wasn't for the embedded photo capability of Trip Reports, I don't know if I would have attempted it.

Originally Posted by lili
The photos have really livened up FT, and I'm enjoying the fantastic contributions. I wish there were a way to comment/ask questions about the photos and read others responses without cluttering the thread.
I have two thoughts on this. First thought: I appreciate the thread having remained mostly photographs since it is the images that are being showcased. It will also make voting easier (by post number), though I'm now leaning towards collecting all the images into a hosted site where people can simply see and vote on images X, Y, and Z without having to scroll through 9 or 10 pages of FlyerTalk thread.

(If anyone objects to this concept of using a hosted site for voting, please PM me).

Second thought: For voting there will be a separate thread to solicit votes. In that thread I would like to invite the voters to describe what they liked about their choices and to ask questions there if so desired.

Originally Posted by lili
The fewer rules the better, and I think you have decided wisely. Not that I'm feeling competitive, and I appreciate your advice to help us upload better photos, but are we aiming for technical expertise or emotion and story telling? Not that they are mutually exclusive.
The primary voting criteria will be how closely the image matches the theme of the contest "Urban Streetscapes". I deliberately chose a topic open to wide interpretation for this first contest to encourage participation. How and why FlyerTalkers will choose one image over another will be left to their individual judgment.

It is my goal to level the playing field as much as possible precisely to allow the $49 camera the same opportunity to win as a $10K wide-format digital-backed technical wonder.

Originally Posted by birdstrike
Anyone and everyone is welcome to join in the fun. Photographic composition is in the mind and eye of the photographer, not the equipment used. If you think your photograph is special, well, so do we!
Originally Posted by birdstrike
Voters will be asked to choose between the submitted images based on the entries visual appeal, artistry, composition, and aptness to the theme of the contest
Originally Posted by lili
I'm "defending" my selection of a "you had to have been there" night shot from my first trip to Venice with a $49 Intel digital camera from the swap meet. I may have a larger version somewhere, but it ain't got more detail! and there is no way to correct for camera movement, yet it is my favorite shot of all my Venice photos. For me it's totally evocative of the unexpected you always find in Venice and I wanted to share. So I did.
I, too, find your photograph extremely evocative. I'm delighted that you chose to share it. ms. birdstrike happened to wander in just now and said "ohhh!" when she saw it. @:-)

To me, the camera movement and grain add to the story your image tells.

Last edited by birdstrike; Mar 17, 2007 at 8:25 pm
birdstrike is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 8:23 pm
  #99  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Programs: QF Bronze, Velocity
Posts: 1,049
I must admit I really enjoyed going through my photos and trying to find ones I thought fitted the theme. I definately want more of these!
TIMP is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 10:13 pm
  #100  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by lili
The photos have really livened up FT, and I'm enjoying the fantastic contributions. I wish there were a way to comment/ask questions about the photos and read others responses without cluttering the thread.
Lili, please see my sig.
PTravel is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2007, 11:55 pm
  #101  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
Atlas @ St. Patrick's, Rockefeller Center, New York

1st entry, August 2006
BuddyBird is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2007, 12:01 am
  #102  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,800
I want a Micro Van! Shinjuku, Tokyo

2nd entry, July 2005
BuddyBird is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2007, 6:34 am
  #103  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane AU, Planet X
Programs: QC Life, QFF Gold, VA Gold, HH nothing,IHG Gold
Posts: 1,605


London November 2006, taken from the top of St Pauls Cathedral. And it was sunny.

Ok 2 shots from this series from me done, competition is going to be tough.

Love the Tokyo Shinjuku photos was only there a few months ago.
Bundy Bear is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2007, 9:22 am
  #104  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SFOSJCOAK
Programs: AA-EXP & 1MM+, AS, MR-LTT, HH Gold
Posts: 7,581
Over done - re-size downward

Originally Posted by birdstrike
Just got back to my computer after a day in SF.

allset2travel, your images meet the 800 pixel max dimension requirement.

The folks I was addressing above were those who have posted the small 500x300 pixel images and, to a lesser extent, those who have posted 800x images that are only 85KB in size.

I did go back and look at your pictures. They are oversized in terms of KB by almost 3x. So, in the interests of bandwidth, and to keep the playing field level in terms of JPEG compression artifacts, I would appreciate it if you would recompress your original images to also meet the 200KB requirement.

and you folks with the small pictures - they are really good and need to be upsized ( if the originals allow) to do them justice.
My photos now are too small. When trying to down-size within photobucket.som, I shrink image from 800x600 (original post on FT) to 2 steps down.Now they are only 160x115. I would like to bump them back up to 800x600. But at 800x600, the total bytes would exceed your rule.Help!
allset2travel is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2007, 9:41 am
  #105  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Originally Posted by allset2travel
I would like to bump them back up to 800x600. But at 800x600, the total bytes would exceed your rule.Help!
Very strange. I tried to resample them in Picassa, but that didn't work. I fired up Photoshop and that did the trick:

http://www.batnet.com/bogart/allset1_71.jpg
http://www.batnet.com/bogart/allset2_80.jpg

You can either pull these down and rehost on Photobucket, or link to them directly from my site.

Thanks for making the change!

Regards,

Rick
birdstrike is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.