SQ J on 747?
Aug 8, 11, 6:16 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Programs: BA GGL & LTG, EK Silver, HHonors Lifetime Diamond; Proudly Mucci Free - total nonsense
Posts: 862
SQ J on 747?
I don't have a TR to post, but have a TR to ask. Any TR's from recent SQ J on 747? All the ones I have found are for F or on A380 or both. Wondering if anyone in the FT community has a link at hand. thanks
Aug 9, 11, 4:18 am
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Programs: BA GGL & LTG, EK Silver, HHonors Lifetime Diamond; Proudly Mucci Free - total nonsense
Posts: 862
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG
Howabout doing a search yourself ?
If you've nothing constructive to say, why bother wasting your time posting???
Aug 9, 11, 11:19 am
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: OneSky Alliance Elite+ with Zirconium and oak leaf cluster, Braniff Unobtainium
Posts: 18,391
You would probably get a better reception if you were to post questions about SQ 747/Spacebed C and the overall experience in the SQ forum, as opposed to posting a question in a forum dedicated to trip reports (as opposed to asking and answering questions about a particular airline).
Also, FT's search engine isn't so great. Use Google instead, like so:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sq+747+C+site%3Aflyertalk.com
Google is usually a good place to go in general if you use search terms like "singapore air 747 business class trip report" (there are other sites that will have detailed trip reports too, like airliners.net or SQTalk).
Finally, since the Spacebed's been in 747 C since 2002...
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/27/bu...5000-feet.html
So you might not need a terribly recent trip report to get an idea of what the hard product is like (the main difference, from my understanding, is that the few 747s still left aren't in as good a shape as newer SQ planes, plus some grumbling that the soft product's in some decline- less satays, less champagne in the lounges and so on).
Also, FT's search engine isn't so great. Use Google instead, like so:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sq+747+C+site%3Aflyertalk.com
Google is usually a good place to go in general if you use search terms like "singapore air 747 business class trip report" (there are other sites that will have detailed trip reports too, like airliners.net or SQTalk).
Finally, since the Spacebed's been in 747 C since 2002...
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/27/bu...5000-feet.html
So you might not need a terribly recent trip report to get an idea of what the hard product is like (the main difference, from my understanding, is that the few 747s still left aren't in as good a shape as newer SQ planes, plus some grumbling that the soft product's in some decline- less satays, less champagne in the lounges and so on).
Aug 9, 11, 1:43 pm
#7
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: AUH
Posts: 7,519
Aug 10, 11, 3:12 am
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Programs: BA GGL & LTG, EK Silver, HHonors Lifetime Diamond; Proudly Mucci Free - total nonsense
Posts: 862
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
You would probably get a better reception if you were to post questions about SQ 747/Spacebed C and the overall experience in the SQ forum, as opposed to posting a question in a forum dedicated to trip reports (as opposed to asking and answering questions about a particular airline).
Also, FT's search engine isn't so great. Use Google instead, like so:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sq+747+C+site%3Aflyertalk.com
Google is usually a good place to go in general if you use search terms like "singapore air 747 business class trip report" (there are other sites that will have detailed trip reports too, like airliners.net or SQTalk).
Finally, since the Spacebed's been in 747 C since 2002...
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/27/bu...5000-feet.html
So you might not need a terribly recent trip report to get an idea of what the hard product is like (the main difference, from my understanding, is that the few 747s still left aren't in as good a shape as newer SQ planes, plus some grumbling that the soft product's in some decline- less satays, less champagne in the lounges and so on).
Also, FT's search engine isn't so great. Use Google instead, like so:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sq+747+C+site%3Aflyertalk.com
Google is usually a good place to go in general if you use search terms like "singapore air 747 business class trip report" (there are other sites that will have detailed trip reports too, like airliners.net or SQTalk).
Finally, since the Spacebed's been in 747 C since 2002...
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/27/bu...5000-feet.html
So you might not need a terribly recent trip report to get an idea of what the hard product is like (the main difference, from my understanding, is that the few 747s still left aren't in as good a shape as newer SQ planes, plus some grumbling that the soft product's in some decline- less satays, less champagne in the lounges and so on).
Aug 10, 11, 3:13 am
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Programs: BA GGL & LTG, EK Silver, HHonors Lifetime Diamond; Proudly Mucci Free - total nonsense
Posts: 862
Originally Posted by stargold
