Attorney Travel and International Law
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Baton Rouge/New Orleans, LA
Programs: AA, DL, UA
Posts: 32
Attorney Travel and International Law
I know that there are some attorneys on this site. How much travel is involved in your profession? I realize that there are some attorneys that travel quite abit and there are those that hardly ever travel. I would like to find out more about the profession. What practice areas travel the most and to where? Individual stories would be great. I am a junior at LSU and intend on going to law school. I will most likely go to LSU or Tulane Law school. Will the fact that Louisiana Law is civil based as opposed to the common law basis of the rest of the USA help land a job in International Law (I am also interested in aviation law [big surprise])? Louisiana Law schools train students in both civil and common law. Will the fact that parts of Europe are civil law based help me land a job that will require me to practice in both Europe and the United States, provided my grades from law school are adequate?
#2
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison NJ; Watopia
Posts: 3,161
I work for a large finl services firm in the LegalCompliance dept. I have responsibility for covering our international branch offices. This means I'm in either Europe or Asia about once per quarter. My "specialty" is securities law, more particularly investment advisory. I think with the proliferation of hedge funds and private equity and other US type "products", this area will continue to grow.
I don't think attending law at LSU will convey any particular advantage, or disadvantage for that matter. While civil law is prominent in some European jurisdictions, my experience has been that common law is, well, pretty common. In my particular area, I've noticed that a lot of foreign jurisdictions actually look to US practice when formulating rules and regs for their capital markets, etc. In Europe, there's a good amount of momentum towards harmonication (do a google search on MiFid), so I think that barriers to practice will continue to recede.
I took a course in aviation law when I went to law school. It was pretty interesting, and much of aviation law precedent comes from shipping law. As I recall property right issues are huge, and liability under the Geneva convention too. I went to school pre 9/11, so I can't comment on how things have changed since then.
In order to land the best law job possible, your priorities should be, in order:
1) Getting into the law school of your choice. I.e., keep your grades up and prep well for the LSAT.
2) When you get into law school, do everything you can to keep your grades up. Also participate in law reviews, journals, etc should the opportunity present itself. I'm not familiar with LSU, but if they publish some sort of transportation law journal, that would be a good one to shoot for.
Finally, one piece of insight I would pass on to any person considering a career in law: be prepared to work like a dog. Long hours are expected, and you won't have much time to do much of anything else. You'll make decent money, especially if you land a position at a large law firm, but it's really blood money that they're paying you. That said, law can be a rewarding career - but go into it eyes open so you don't get disillusioned like a lot of young attorneys do.
Good luck !
I don't think attending law at LSU will convey any particular advantage, or disadvantage for that matter. While civil law is prominent in some European jurisdictions, my experience has been that common law is, well, pretty common. In my particular area, I've noticed that a lot of foreign jurisdictions actually look to US practice when formulating rules and regs for their capital markets, etc. In Europe, there's a good amount of momentum towards harmonication (do a google search on MiFid), so I think that barriers to practice will continue to recede.
I took a course in aviation law when I went to law school. It was pretty interesting, and much of aviation law precedent comes from shipping law. As I recall property right issues are huge, and liability under the Geneva convention too. I went to school pre 9/11, so I can't comment on how things have changed since then.
In order to land the best law job possible, your priorities should be, in order:
1) Getting into the law school of your choice. I.e., keep your grades up and prep well for the LSAT.
2) When you get into law school, do everything you can to keep your grades up. Also participate in law reviews, journals, etc should the opportunity present itself. I'm not familiar with LSU, but if they publish some sort of transportation law journal, that would be a good one to shoot for.
Finally, one piece of insight I would pass on to any person considering a career in law: be prepared to work like a dog. Long hours are expected, and you won't have much time to do much of anything else. You'll make decent money, especially if you land a position at a large law firm, but it's really blood money that they're paying you. That said, law can be a rewarding career - but go into it eyes open so you don't get disillusioned like a lot of young attorneys do.
Good luck !
#3
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 287
If you have a really strong interest in international law, you probably want to think about law firms that have international practices (at least as a first step). Those will primarily be large national law firms, often based in NYC, and they concentrate their hiring on the very top law students, so the advice on grades was good advice. I have had an opportunity to travel on behalf of clients on a few international trips, and if you want to TRAVEL overseas (as opposed to becoming an Expat, which is different), I think you would want to look at doing some type of corporate practice, as opposed to a litigation practice. I can only echo the previous poster's comments on the workload that is the norm for associates (and partners, for that matter) at the large law firms; you can pretty much expect no vacations and very few uncluttered weekends for years on end at certain large firms. You make great $$$ but at a high price.
#4
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: YPE
Posts: 421
You'll make decent money, especially if you land a position at a large law firm,
but it's really blood money that they're paying you.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,562
I am an attorney for a large aerospace company. I provide legal support to our sales force for customers (airlines) based in Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand and the Middle East. I negotiate sales contracts, contract amendments/close-outs and resolve disputes with customers prior to them becoming litigation.
Recent transactions have included:
More mundane tasks include drafting letters, non-disclosure agreements and giving training on various legal matters. I also teach a class on airliner identification as part of the training we give to new employees in our legal department.
My total amount of travel depends on the deals we have in the pipeline. Last year I spent 12 weeks in Shanghai, 1 week in Haikou and 1 week in Seoul. So far this year I have spent one week in Shanghai. Travel is in paid business class (upgraded to First by me) and hotels are Westins and St. Regis properties. Since the value of the deals we work on are so large, our company has a high tolerance for travel expenses. Since I mostly travel with sales guys, I live quite well on the road, but traveling to low cost of living countries helps that.
Recent transactions have included:
More mundane tasks include drafting letters, non-disclosure agreements and giving training on various legal matters. I also teach a class on airliner identification as part of the training we give to new employees in our legal department.
My total amount of travel depends on the deals we have in the pipeline. Last year I spent 12 weeks in Shanghai, 1 week in Haikou and 1 week in Seoul. So far this year I have spent one week in Shanghai. Travel is in paid business class (upgraded to First by me) and hotels are Westins and St. Regis properties. Since the value of the deals we work on are so large, our company has a high tolerance for travel expenses. Since I mostly travel with sales guys, I live quite well on the road, but traveling to low cost of living countries helps that.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,562
If I can add-on to this comment, its worth noting that even in the international oil and gas sector (and probably in most international transactions, although I don't know for sure), agreements are drafted with the idea that if a dispute arises, it will be governed under US law (usually Texas or NY), because you most certainly you don't want to be litigating in Angola! So the idea of practicing "international law" may not be what you think it is.
That said, we do arbitrate outside the United States. My colleague recently completed a two week arbitration hearing in Singapore as that is where the dispute resolution clause specified (even though the contract was governed by CT law).
#9
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: CO Platinum
Posts: 38
Just to add to the fine advice already proffered:
1. Don't choose LSU unless you're certain you want to practice in Louisiana. Tulane will give you more options.
2. Traveling for business is not the same as traveling for pleasure. You may very well find that there is nothing you dislike more than traveling for business. You rarely have time to see any sights, and especially as an attorney, you'll resent how it becomes that much harder to make your billable hours when you're on the road.
3. A firm with a broad base of multinational clients is the one that will offer the most opportunities for (international) travel. Multinational clients tend to cluster at big name firms.
1. Don't choose LSU unless you're certain you want to practice in Louisiana. Tulane will give you more options.
2. Traveling for business is not the same as traveling for pleasure. You may very well find that there is nothing you dislike more than traveling for business. You rarely have time to see any sights, and especially as an attorney, you'll resent how it becomes that much harder to make your billable hours when you're on the road.
3. A firm with a broad base of multinational clients is the one that will offer the most opportunities for (international) travel. Multinational clients tend to cluster at big name firms.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,562
#11
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: UA Plat/2MM [23-yr. 1K, now emeritus] clawing way back to WN-A List; MR LT Titanium; HY Whateverist.
Posts: 12,396
golfguylsu, welcome to FT! Given that law practice is most demanding, as others have noted, I'd recommend choosing the practice subject and type that you enjoy and not focus on which type of practice generates a lot of travel. If the practice doesn't offer travel, then, as suggested, handle the travel as a personal recreation.
#12
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NOLA
Programs: DL PM and some other junk I hardly use...
Posts: 66
Funny you should mention this...
My brother went to Tulane and did their MBA/JD joint degree program. He's been part of the working world for... maybe eight years now. If I remember right he was there for five years, maybe six. He did his undergrad in marketing at SF State. He's barred in Louisiana and as of three years ago, Texas. He deals with oil/gas/minerals and travels to China/Taiwan a few times a year. He travels from LA to TX a lot, for a few days at a time. He doesn't litigate though, I guess the company he works for retains "real" lawyers for that. He just negotiates, drafts letters and manages a team of lower level negotiators. From what he's said he apparently he relies more on the MBA portion of his education (managing, projecting etc) than on the JD.
If it's something you're seriously interested I can pass along any specific questions you have about the Tulane program you have to him, or put you in contact with him.
If it's between the two, I'd go with Tulane for the reasons people have already listed.
My brother went to Tulane and did their MBA/JD joint degree program. He's been part of the working world for... maybe eight years now. If I remember right he was there for five years, maybe six. He did his undergrad in marketing at SF State. He's barred in Louisiana and as of three years ago, Texas. He deals with oil/gas/minerals and travels to China/Taiwan a few times a year. He travels from LA to TX a lot, for a few days at a time. He doesn't litigate though, I guess the company he works for retains "real" lawyers for that. He just negotiates, drafts letters and manages a team of lower level negotiators. From what he's said he apparently he relies more on the MBA portion of his education (managing, projecting etc) than on the JD.
If it's something you're seriously interested I can pass along any specific questions you have about the Tulane program you have to him, or put you in contact with him.
If it's between the two, I'd go with Tulane for the reasons people have already listed.
#13
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TYO / WAS / NYC
Programs: American Express got a hit man lookin' for me
Posts: 4,596
Tulane is a workable option for an international business law job, but not the best one. You will need to be in the top 5% of your class, or have some other eye-popping credentials, to get your foot into the door at most serious employers.
If you have good undergrad grades and LSAT scores, consider big-name schools. NYU, Berkeley, Stanford or any place in the Ivy League will get you into this sort of job lickety-split. Yes, you'll have to go into debt, but the degree will pay for itself when you're making $145k plus bonuses in your first year out, whereas if you stay in-state, you could EASILY end up settling with a crappy $50k job at a no-name firm in Shreveport, wondering where you went wrong.
Disclaimers that should be on every law school application:
1) Your class rank in law school will probably be much worse than you expect it to be (everyone is an overachiever, even in the middle-tier schools, and you're graded on a curve).
2) The average starting salaries which most schools publish are highly inflated.
An MBA is a good choice if you're staying in-state, since it will make you more qualified for quasi-lawyering jobs like the one described above.
If you have good undergrad grades and LSAT scores, consider big-name schools. NYU, Berkeley, Stanford or any place in the Ivy League will get you into this sort of job lickety-split. Yes, you'll have to go into debt, but the degree will pay for itself when you're making $145k plus bonuses in your first year out, whereas if you stay in-state, you could EASILY end up settling with a crappy $50k job at a no-name firm in Shreveport, wondering where you went wrong.
Disclaimers that should be on every law school application:
1) Your class rank in law school will probably be much worse than you expect it to be (everyone is an overachiever, even in the middle-tier schools, and you're graded on a curve).
2) The average starting salaries which most schools publish are highly inflated.
An MBA is a good choice if you're staying in-state, since it will make you more qualified for quasi-lawyering jobs like the one described above.
#14
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,476
Apart from this being a topic that a number of us on FT could give in our sleep I have to say it's a real surprise that at a large aerospace company, of all organisations, they had to get a lawyer to teach a formal class on this topic.
#15
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 1,393