Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

CMH-based Skybus

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CMH-based Skybus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 9:40 am
  #361  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: BDL
Programs: NWA Platinum, HHonors Diamond, SPG, YX, AA
Posts: 5,354
Originally Posted by FlyerInCmh
The sad thing is will be able to line up investors again who are willing to piss their money away...
MKEbound is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 12:05 am
  #362  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,088
Originally Posted by FlyerInCmh
Are you absolutely sure about SX will able restore for flying again? Its doesn't happening again due to losing the financial. My questions what exactly SX gonna do for now? Do you think SX need more fuel surcharges all of those passengers. They will payable for the fuel. Its absolutely will able save the business for a long time instead of shutdown operations.
N830MH is offline  
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 12:17 am
  #363  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,651
Originally Posted by SkyTeam777
It is so sad to see four Skybus planes parked at their gates at Greensboro/High Point. The engines are covered for protection from the elements. What will happen to them in the short term...sit at GSO until someone buys them or will they be ferried somewhere?
I can see Virgin America buying them, for some reason.
stupidhead is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 1:32 am
  #364  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,088
Originally Posted by stupidhead
I can see Virgin America buying them, for some reason.
I don't see anything more logical choice VX wants buying with other airlines. I think VX is considered to keep it the name for a long time instead of merger with other airlines. I don't think if they will not able merge with them. That's is good options if VX will merge with B6 some more reasonable.
N830MH is offline  
Old May 22, 2008 | 11:12 pm
  #365  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Programs: Delta SkyMiles Platinum
Posts: 5
Sprit vs SkyBus

Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge
...or Spirit (privately held, no numbers released, but business model very close to Skybus and said to be unprofitable)
SkyBus had good ancillary sales per customer - it might have been as high as $10. They sold everything from the standard food fare to chocolates and jewery and even timeshares onboard!

This is definitely a good model for low cost carriers, I would expect Spirit (who I believe is profitable) to try and match that part of the model.
Colt Cooper is offline  
Old May 22, 2008 | 11:19 pm
  #366  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Programs: Delta SkyMiles Platinum
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by WHBM
It's incorrect to compare Skybus with Ryanair, who they only took a few elements of the business model from - and the wrong elements.

Ryanair, after a false start with commuter prop aircraft which nearly finished them off, got going on London to Dublin, a trunk route which was already one of the largest city pairs in Europe, with regulated service, high prices, and many passengers forced by price to use an inconvenient rail/ship surface route. What an opportunity. And they started with cheap jet aircraft leased from Romania, moving on to still well-used 737-200s. Growth was steady and only as funds became available from other operations. Only in recent years, once their brand image became well established with substantial growth of the business have they moved on to new aircraft.

Skybus on the other hand started off on city pairs previously unserved (previously unserved for a very good reason of course), running on investors money rather than generated funds, and with all the costs of brand new aircraft from day one. Quite different.
I agree - they had, what 60 mill to start with with another 60 mill promised? Plus, they were renting newer planes and had an offer from CMH to build them their own hangar. That does sound a lot different than Ryan.

What's interesting is that even though they had new/newer planes, their turn around times were bad. It's all about butts in seats, and they were planning on 30 minute turnaround times because of the newer planes (no maintenance, fewer mechanical irops). I mean if you looked at the schedule for a single plane in a day it looked crazy.
Colt Cooper is offline  
Old May 23, 2008 | 8:06 am
  #367  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
5M
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NC
Programs: AAConciergeKey/2MM, DL DM/2MM, UA Gold,Hilton Diamond,IHG Diamond, Hyatt Globalist,Marriott Titanium
Posts: 13,224
What's interesting is that people complained about paying to check a bag, and now legacies are following suit with AA charging for the first bag!
SkyTeam777 is offline  
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 10:30 am
  #368  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 27
Thumbs up money refunded

I was able to get refunds on 100% of my Skybus flights, about $400 bucks.

Amex was easy, but I bought two tickets through ING Direct with my debit card and suprisingly they refunded my money too !! I guess they wanted to keep me a happy customer !

-KEn
Ken_V is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.