Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

First class flight vs first class hotel

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

First class flight vs first class hotel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:00 am
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home
Programs: Virgin FC, Qantas, Golden Circle, Sofitel, Hyatt, Starwood, Nectar, and my Tesco Club Card
Posts: 1,773
First class flight vs first class hotel

In the ideal world we'd all be rich, fly everywhere First Class and stay in the most luxurious hotels whenever we travelled. Unfortunately life just isn't like that for most of us.

I often read the trip reports on this forum and am surprised how often people regularly travel First Class, seemingly paying for their own ticket, and then stay in what is generally recognised as a fairly mundane hotel. I know from time to time there may be a particular reason why a hotel is selected.

I, personally, find it difficult to imagine that I would be prepared to pay several thousand pounds for a comfy seat and a few nice glasses of wine and then put up with staying in a run of the mill 3* hotel for the next 7 days. I'd much rather spend the money on making sure the 7 days were as enjoyable and luxurious as possible and by necessity sacrifice the 12 hours up front on the flights.

What is the general consensus. If you had to pick 1 and not both would it be the First Class flight or the first class hotel?
Kettering Northants QC is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:06 am
  #2  
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
30 Countries Visited
1M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,217
First class airline seat hands down!

When I consider how much time I actually spend in a hotel room.. and usually just sleeping... and I rarely use the fancy amenities of a first class hotel... it is not worth it for me.

I find a first class airline seat makes the trip much more comfortable and enjoyable for me.

However, a king size bed in a mediocre hotel gives me the relative same sleep as one in a five star hotel.

William
wharvey is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:14 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 927
The first class seat, without hesitation - especially for long flights.

I don't much care about the hotel, so long as it is clean and has comfy linens. Dunno about you, but I don't fly thousands of miles to lanquish inside the hotel room - but I do want to get there feeling human and whole.
flymeaway is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:22 am
  #4  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sarasota, FL
Programs: Northwest Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Intercontinental Royal Ambassador, National Executive Elite
Posts: 613
Agreed

1st class seat all the way. Hotels are hotels for the most part. Long, uncomfortable flights need all the help they can get.
jjlovecub is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:25 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K and MM, AA EXP
Posts: 427
Originally Posted by wharvey
First class airline seat hands down!

When I consider how much time I actually spend in a hotel room.. and usually just sleeping... and I rarely use the fancy amenities of a first class hotel... it is not worth it for me.

I find a first class airline seat makes the trip much more comfortable and enjoyable for me.

However, a king size bed in a mediocre hotel gives me the relative same sleep as one in a five star hotel.

William
I agree completely! I prefer to go premium class all the way, but if I have to compromise I would rather do so with the hotel rather than with the flight.
TimInSF is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:35 am
  #6  
Ambassador: World of Hyatt
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK - the nearest airport is named after a motorway !
Posts: 4,275
Hotel for me.

I'd rather take a week of luxury in a hotel over a few hours of slightly-more-comfortable-than-down-the-back on a plane.
Stewie Mac is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:46 am
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SAN
Posts: 2,426
For vacation travel, the first class hotel does it for me. It's almost a pleasure to pay the extra $$$. I'll remember the Bora Bora Nui OWB, the CP view room at the NYC MO or the room at Il Palazzo in Venice overlooking the Grand Canal much longer than any premium airline seat. Of course, I'll also sleep in a tent (and I'm not talking about a luxury safari tent) if that's what's necessary to go somewhere (e.g. kayaking the Grand Canyon).

I look at flying premium cabin (C in my case for the most part) more as a necessity and clearly as a rip-off. I really have trouble recovering from Y after the overnight leg of an intercontinental flight. Only fly C so that I can actually get to work the next day. For daytime flights, Y is fine.
schwarm is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 11:14 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: PHL (and sometimes BKK)
Programs: aa/ua gold; mar titanium. SPG till I die.
Posts: 15,649
All hotel rooms look the same with your eyes closed.

I use my miles to fly first/biz and stay in hostels or priceline hotels.. I'm doing this in a few days when I go to NRT.
civicmon is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 12:59 pm
  #9  
tgw
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 214
I'm a hotel person. I don't even begin to waste my time with the airlines. I can deal with bad set for a few hours, but I want a comfortable, and clean hotel after a long day of travel with the feeling that I am taken care of.
tgw is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 1:23 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: BAEC Gold, Delta Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, AMEX Platinum (US)
Posts: 18,541
Depends. I won't stay in an absolute flea pit so I can go in a mildly better airline seat.

However as others have said I rarely stay in my hotel room much when I am away, that is unless I am at a resort hotel, in which case I am more likely to compromise on the flight. Flying F/J to stay in an armpit of a resort is stupid. When in cities I am rarely in the room other than to sleep.
Fraser is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 1:27 pm
  #11  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
Flight definitely. On many trips I'll spend far more time in the air than in a hotel, and as others posted already any nice bed is fine - doesnt need to be supernice.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 1:42 pm
  #12  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA ExecPlat; UA gold; Hyatt L. Globalist; Marriott gold; Hilton gold; FB silver; National EE
Posts: 6,439
Flight, definitely.
Buster CT1K is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 1:56 pm
  #13  
5M150 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: US
Programs: LH and BA
Posts: 2,324
I only fly F, business or private (except if F is full -- yes it happens) for health reasons. In any hotel I have a flat bed and enough room to move around. But 8-10 hrs on a plane in econ can literally kill you (especially if oyu do it very other week)
roundtheworld is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 2:06 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stanmore, Sydney, Australia.
Programs: NZ Airpoints GE
Posts: 1,360
The flight most definently....living in Australia most overseas flights are a minimum of 8 hours and nothing worse than arriving feeling like death warmed up. I can tolerate a so so hotel so long asthe beds comfortabel and its clean.
MrSydney is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 2:23 pm
  #15  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston
Programs: UA LT GS/5MM, DL LTDia, HHGold, LTHyattGlob, Marriott LTTitanium, IHG
Posts: 195
Variable. I can usually stand Y for flights less than 8 hours, and would happily stay in Y for a better hotel on the other end. But for long flights (trans-pacs and the like) the ride is definitely more important.

I find it odd that many businesses still fly their people in C for trans Atlantics. It's far cheaper to add a day on the front of a trip and stay in a VERY nice hotel (and recuperate the extra day) than to pay the differential for C fare.
leisure warrior is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.