Was I rude?
#16
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,213
Originally Posted by Efrem
Whether or not keeping seats upright before takeoff is really important to safety (granting that it is a rule that should be followed in either case), whether or not the FAs should have noticed, and whether or not anyone should have brought it to their attention given that they did not notice, are separate issues.
Yet at takeoff, that seat must remain upright. The FA can't possibly know unless the passenger affected notifies him.
Last edited by Analise; Nov 24, 2004 at 8:19 am
#17
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: (not Montana. Nor is my name really Helena, nor am I female)
Programs: Delta, USAirways, Starwood, Priority Club, Marriott, Amex
Posts: 2,557
Originally Posted by Efrem
I'm sorry, but I can't agree that anyone who uses a seat as it was intended to be used (including the recline) is for that reason alone a "wild animal." Economy airline seats are uncomfortable enough as it is. Forcing someone, who paid for a seat known to recline and who reasonably expects to use it as advertised, to endure a flight in its fully upright position is cruel. Flight attendants have been known to inform people behind reclined seats that it is a passenger's right to recline. Several airlines, as posted elsewhere, forbid the use of any device (such as the "knee defender") that is intended to block full recline.
That doesn't mean we have the right to bounce up and down at any time during the flight with total disregard for the poor bloke or blokess behind us. Reasonable courtesy, including checking to make sure we won't bump anything critical if we recline, reclining slowly, accepting some amount of bumping from the confined space to the rear, and not reclining during mealtimes, ought to be standard expectations. But those are not the same as being considered a "wild animal" for letting one's hand approach the recline button.
It comes down to reasonable consideration for fellow passengers, in both directions. Overreactions on either side tend to escalate and get out of hand, as some of us witnessed in a professional basketball game (or in news shows about it) a few days ago. Can't we all get along?
That doesn't mean we have the right to bounce up and down at any time during the flight with total disregard for the poor bloke or blokess behind us. Reasonable courtesy, including checking to make sure we won't bump anything critical if we recline, reclining slowly, accepting some amount of bumping from the confined space to the rear, and not reclining during mealtimes, ought to be standard expectations. But those are not the same as being considered a "wild animal" for letting one's hand approach the recline button.
It comes down to reasonable consideration for fellow passengers, in both directions. Overreactions on either side tend to escalate and get out of hand, as some of us witnessed in a professional basketball game (or in news shows about it) a few days ago. Can't we all get along?
And yes, I suppose "wild animal" was a bit over the top, even in the gratuitous case I applied it to. Sorry about that.
#18


Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Nashua, NH USA
Programs: Seashore Trolley Museum "flight attendant"
Posts: 2,015
The person in front has the right to recline the seat back. The person behind does not have to be extra careful not to touch it.
Both the person in front and the person on the side have the duty to let another person get out to use the rest room or be buffeted as the other person climbs over.
Travel tips:
http://members.aol.com/ajaynejr/travel.htm
Both the person in front and the person on the side have the duty to let another person get out to use the rest room or be buffeted as the other person climbs over.
Travel tips:
http://members.aol.com/ajaynejr/travel.htm
#19




Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
Programs: Bonvoy Titanium, IHG Plat Ambassador, Qatar Gold, Etihad Gold, TK Gold, BA Silver, Emirates Silver
Posts: 1,458
Originally Posted by PappaG
Well said Efrem!
Regardind the actual story. Having the seat reclined during take-off was putting your and your seatmate's life at risk. You should have told him to raise the seat then or called a F/A.
But just as you don't want the one sitting behind you to disturb you, you shouldn't disturb the one in front of you. Getting up by holding the seat in front of you, putting your knees at the back of the seat, or kicking, are all things that can be pretty obnoxious. So don't do them.
The man probably could have told you in a better way, and you probably could behaved in a better way afterwards. So equally bad I'd say..
Regardind the actual story. Having the seat reclined during take-off was putting your and your seatmate's life at risk. You should have told him to raise the seat then or called a F/A.
But just as you don't want the one sitting behind you to disturb you, you shouldn't disturb the one in front of you. Getting up by holding the seat in front of you, putting your knees at the back of the seat, or kicking, are all things that can be pretty obnoxious. So don't do them.
The man probably could have told you in a better way, and you probably could behaved in a better way afterwards. So equally bad I'd say..
If I end up in Y, I do try to ensure I get bulkhead, exit or E+ ion UA. But I do agree that politeness/common decency is required in a cramped coach cabin.
#21


Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Programs: Hilton Gold, Priority Club Platinum (until December), FB Explorer, BA Blue, M&M Pleb
Posts: 8,616
Originally Posted by djjaguar64
No you were not rude but cheap, you should have flown up front with more leg room. 

People in Y = Cheap
People in J/F = Not Cheap
I didn't realise demographics was so simple
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,242
Originally Posted by PappaG
Well said Efrem!
Regardind the actual story. Having the seat reclined during take-off was putting your and your seatmate's life at risk. You should have told him to raise the seat then or called a F/A.
But just as you don't want the one sitting behind you to disturb you, you shouldn't disturb the one in front of you. Getting up by holding the seat in front of you, putting your knees at the back of the seat, or kicking, are all things that can be pretty obnoxious. So don't do them.
The man probably could have told you in a better way, and you probably could behaved in a better way afterwards. So equally bad I'd say..
Regardind the actual story. Having the seat reclined during take-off was putting your and your seatmate's life at risk. You should have told him to raise the seat then or called a F/A.
But just as you don't want the one sitting behind you to disturb you, you shouldn't disturb the one in front of you. Getting up by holding the seat in front of you, putting your knees at the back of the seat, or kicking, are all things that can be pretty obnoxious. So don't do them.
The man probably could have told you in a better way, and you probably could behaved in a better way afterwards. So equally bad I'd say..
#23


Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HEL
Programs: STE+, used to be with TK but left due to their corruption and political ties
Posts: 4,533
Originally Posted by Japhydog
Putting your knees at the back of the seat is obnoxious? My knees can't help but be at the back of the seat in coach -- I'm 6'3". Where do you propose that I put them?
#24


Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by Analise
Yet the issue is that the man in front reclined his seat during takeoff. This thread isn't about a man who reclined his seat at 35,000 feet. On that part, we agree more than we disagree.
Yet at takeoff, that seat must remain upright. The FA can't possibly know unless the passenger affected notifies him.
Yet at takeoff, that seat must remain upright. The FA can't possibly know unless the passenger affected notifies him.As Efrem pointed out, the context of the original post makes it clear that the issue AS FAR AS THE OP IS CONCERNED is that of propriety. A compelling case can be made for the notion that safety trumps propriety as a matter of priority, but this thread is not titled "Was he acting unsafely?" but "Was I rude"? Furthermore, Amarain does not inquire about whether it is rude to worry about a man's violating safety; he or she did not kick the back of the seat as an expression of alarm over the man's indifference to safety. Rather, Amarain maintains to knock said seat was accidental and the product of spatial limitations. That the man was reclining illegally during takeoff in this particular instance was not the main injury as far as the OP was concerned, but rather the salt that was rubbed into it.
#25
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Florida
Programs: MR PL, Hyatt GP Diamond, HH Gold, UA Silver, WN A-LIst, National EE
Posts: 881
Can someone explain the "safety issue" pre-takeoff?
I am not being facetious, nor am I trying to be disagreeable. But, I have been flying for a few years and always wondered what the safety issue was that is involved with the seat not reclining during takeoff and landing. I have never been so bold as to ask a flight attendant -- as I would just assume that I would get a canned answer.
Clearly, some of the folks here seem to think that the pre-takeoff recline is of the most significant consequence from the OP. One poster said something about putting people's life in danger? I don't know that I have ever seen news reports of airplane passengers killed because their seats were not in the upright position.
Stevekoe
Clearly, some of the folks here seem to think that the pre-takeoff recline is of the most significant consequence from the OP. One poster said something about putting people's life in danger? I don't know that I have ever seen news reports of airplane passengers killed because their seats were not in the upright position.
Stevekoe
#26


Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HEL
Programs: STE+, used to be with TK but left due to their corruption and political ties
Posts: 4,533
Originally Posted by stevekoe
I am not being facetious, nor am I trying to be disagreeable. But, I have been flying for a few years and always wondered what the safety issue was that is involved with the seat not reclining during takeoff and landing. I have never been so bold as to ask a flight attendant -- as I would just assume that I would get a canned answer.
Clearly, some of the folks here seem to think that the pre-takeoff recline is of the most significant consequence from the OP. One poster said something about putting people's life in danger?
Clearly, some of the folks here seem to think that the pre-takeoff recline is of the most significant consequence from the OP. One poster said something about putting people's life in danger?
I don't know that I have ever seen news reports of airplane passengers killed because their seats were not in the upright position.
#27
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 6,932
You want to be able to evacuate the plane as quickly as possible in the event of, for instance, an engine fire during runup. However, like most of the in-cabin safety precautions, they are extremely unlikely to make a difference in anyone's actual risk of surviving the flight.
QL
QL
#28
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA/BD Gold/IC A/*Wood Gold - Certified BodyCombat and BodyPump Instructor
Posts: 6,070
if you do want to recline your seat during takeoff, you could always try the new Virgin Suite:
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/en/gb...efaq/index.jsp
I understand that they have a built in airbag with the seat belt.
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/en/gb...efaq/index.jsp
Does the seat have to be upright for takeoff and landing?
No. You can choose the seat position you want, from upright to reclined.
No. You can choose the seat position you want, from upright to reclined.
#29
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 957
Originally Posted by amarain
I must admit that after that, I did not exactly make an effort to not disturb him, and he later turned around again and gave me the same spiel again,
So my question is, was I rude?
So my question is, was I rude?
#30
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 18
You were not rude at all!
This entire thread is caused by the main issue that was recently litigated by a Tall Club out in California which IS: Tall people have a feature (being tall) which is NOT changeable physically, similar to african-americans (who can't change the color of their skin) or other features. We are tall--we can't help it. Why should we be penalized by the airlines for that? Or incur the wrath of a fellow passenger?
She is tall, she can afford a coach ticket. She shouldn't be raped by first-class fares and punished for this feature.
What do you suggest she do? Have her knees surgically removed so she can be 3 inches shorter?
She is tall, she can afford a coach ticket. She shouldn't be raped by first-class fares and punished for this feature.
What do you suggest she do? Have her knees surgically removed so she can be 3 inches shorter?

