Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Fingerprinting question

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Fingerprinting question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 4:45 am
  #31  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Terra Australis Cognita
Posts: 5,353
And while I'm at it, do US visas stay valid if the passport they're in has expired? I have have a G-1 visa that is technically valid forever (and exempt from the new regulations), but it's in a passport that expired ten years ago...
jpatokal is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 10:57 am
  #32  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 16,064
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by jpatokal:
I have have a G-1 visa that is technically valid forever (and exempt from the new regulations), but it's in a passport that expired ten years ago...</font>
As of February 1, 1995 all visas initially issued with "indefinite" validity have been deemed to expire 10 years from the date of issue. Hence, the visa is no longer valid.

However, any visa located in an expired passport remains valid provided it has not been defaced or damaged and it is within the visa validity period (maximum of 10 years).
B747-437B is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 1:06 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 7,419
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by B747-437B:
As of February 1, 1995 all visas initially issued with "indefinite" validity have been deemed to expire 10 years from the date of issue. Hence, the visa is no longer valid.

However, any visa located in an expired passport remains valid provided it has not been defaced or damaged and it is within the visa validity period (maximum of 10 years).
</font>
I second this!
B747-437B:
I believe they still issue B1/B2 visas "indefinite" (=10 years).
USAFAN is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 1:17 am
  #34  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 667
i am now completely confused, as a German citizen, here on a Student visa (F1),
which of the following applies to me:
- i need an interview BEFORE i come
- i need an interview AFTER i arrive (within 30 days?!?)
- i need an interview BEFORE i depart (for vacation etc.?!)
- i need an interview WHILE i depart?
- i need fingerprinting and a picture at ANY time (coming leaving...?!?)

thanks!
MazdaMP is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 8:28 am
  #35  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Terra Australis Cognita
Posts: 5,353
MazdaMP, as far as I understand it (don't sue me if INS disagrees!) --

1) you don't need an interview before you come, because Germany is in the Visa Waiver Program
2) you don't need one after you come, unless you've been to the suspicious Muslim countries listed earlier and can't give a good reason why
3) see number 1
4) see number 2
5) see number 1

So you don't have much to worry about... unless there are special requirements for the F-1 visa itself.

jpatokal is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 8:36 am
  #36  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 667
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by jpatokal:
MazdaMP, as far as I understand it (don't sue me if INS disagrees!) --

1) you don't need an interview before you come, because Germany is in the Visa Waiver Program
2) you don't need one after you come, unless you've been to the suspicious Muslim countries listed earlier and can't give a good reason why
3) see number 1
4) see number 2
5) see number 1

So you don't have much to worry about... unless there are special requirements for the F-1 visa itself.

</font>

thank you very much....i got all nervous here... (i thought i'd need the fingerprint and pic, but not the rest...little do i know )

thanks!
MazdaMP is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 11:04 am
  #37  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 16,064
The VWP is only applicable to B1/B2 status and not F1 status, so you do require an interview prior to appearing at the Port of Entry (only exception to this is Canadian citizens).

At the Port of Entry, the examining officer will make a determination whether to enrol you in the NSEERS process. If you are selected you will be fingerprinted, photographed and interviewed again. You would also need to appear for a 30 day interview, a 12-month interview and an exit interview - as well as file form AR-11SR everytime you travel within the United States.

Regardless of your enrolment in the NSEERS process, effective from August 2003 you will have responsibility to ensure that your data in SEVIS (speak to the institute that sponsored the I-20 for SEVIS details) is up-to-date as long as you remain in F1 status.

Technically, you do need to file a standard AR-11 for all domestic travel you undertake, but rule of thumb is that this is not enforced except for trips exeeding one week away from the address on file. If you are a NSEERS registrant though, the AR-11SR filing is mandatory even if you just drive 2 hours to visit a friend.

[This message has been edited by B747-437B (edited Nov 16, 2003).]
B747-437B is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 5:31 pm
  #38  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 667
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by B747-437B:
The VWP is only applicable to B1/B2 status and not F1 status, so you do require an interview prior to appearing at the Port of Entry (only exception to this is Canadian citizens).

At the Port of Entry, the examining officer will make a determination whether to enrol you in the NSEERS process. If you are selected you will be fingerprinted, photographed and interviewed again. You would also need to appear for a 30 day interview, a 12-month interview and an exit interview - as well as file form AR-11SR everytime you travel within the United States.

Regardless of your enrolment in the NSEERS process, effective from August 2003 you will have responsibility to ensure that your data in SEVIS (speak to the institute that sponsored the I-20 for SEVIS details) is up-to-date as long as you remain in F1 status.

Technically, you do need to file a standard AR-11 for all domestic travel you undertake, but rule of thumb is that this is not enforced except for trips exeeding one week away from the address on file. If you are a NSEERS registrant though, the AR-11SR filing is mandatory even if you just drive 2 hours to visit a friend.

[This message has been edited by B747-437B (edited Nov 16, 2003).]
</font>

so considering I am here already, the "next" time i enter the country will be the deciding factor whether I will be enrolled in NSEERS?!
I am already in the SEVIS, so that's taken care of...
MazdaMP is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 9:29 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 592
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by jpatokal:
Hmm-mm... the "Phase 2" bit of the second advisory is interesting. It's not enough to just visit the countries, the trips have to be "unexplained" or explained in a way that "lacks credibility".</font>
Who wants to bet that all of the following explanations would, in the US government's infinite wisdom, "lack credibility":
  • "I was on holiday."
  • "I was sightseeing."
  • "I was relaxing on the beach."
  • "My employer does considerable business in Kuala Lumpur."

This is yet another weapon of mass harassment for whimsical immigration officers who are convinced that everyone coming to the USA is a terrorist waiting to be "weeded out".
Factotum is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 12:25 am
  #40  
kpc
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sydney
Programs: QF Plat, HH Diam
Posts: 2,126
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/...027021940.html

I assume this person was travelling on an Australian passport...I thought after the Brits, we were the US's best ally on the war on terrorism...we even sent troops to Afghanistan and Iraq even though a significant number of the population disaproved.

What happened to the person in the article could easily be me or you

------------------
kpc
kpc is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 4:56 am
  #41  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by eastwest:
I am really not trying to start a flame war here, but since you asked what the response is now, I'll answer.</font>
No, neither am I. But I do enjoy discussion And if I can point out with the greatest of respect, that you didn't actually answer my question!

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">I don't see the relevance. </font>
I was making the point that I shouldn't have to feel like a criminal just to visit another country - especially if my visit may be bringing benefit to that country.

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Because America is at war?</font>
Hmm, must have missed that declaration. And if they are at war, why aren't they treating the detainees at Guantanamo Bay under the Geneva Convention? And I come from a country meant to be their bestest friend - why am I being treated like an enemy? In fact why are they treating citizens from virtually any other country (excepting maybe Canada, and I bet some Canadians will fall within these rules as well) like their enemies?

Jenbel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.