FAA bill would force the agency to craft 'real world' rules for airplane evacuations
#16
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,263
You can search the NTSB database for such recommendations.
Here's one from the AAL 767 uncontained engine failure during takeoff at ORD a few years ago. Six of the nine recommendations are related to evacuation.
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/...CA17FA021.aspx
I don't know of any recommendations for changes to how the maximum seating capacity is determined but that doesn't mean that there aren't some.
Last edited by LarryJ; May 17, 2024 at 12:24 pm
#17
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 42,121
I certainly agree there's no magic in 90 seconds and half the exits. Maybe it's time for a 60-second standard with half the exits blocked, given the artificial conditions that have to be in place.
The 90-second standard was developed in the 1960s, when far fewer persons with disabilities were flying. I don't think putting some luggage in the aisle makes up for that 60-year trend.
The 90-second standard was developed in the 1960s, when far fewer persons with disabilities were flying. I don't think putting some luggage in the aisle makes up for that 60-year trend.
People weren't flying with pets and service animals in the 60's either. You might convince most people to leave their bags behind, but no one is leaving a pet or service animal behind.
#18
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: GTHA
Programs: Aeroplan, NEXUS
Posts: 195
There's also the uncomfortable issue of people who require wheelchair assistance to board and deplane. Presumably the FAs have training on how best to handle those situations.
People weren't flying with pets and service animals in the 60's either. You might convince most people to leave their bags behind, but no one is leaving a pet or service animal behind.
People weren't flying with pets and service animals in the 60's either. You might convince most people to leave their bags behind, but no one is leaving a pet or service animal behind.
#19
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,984
Not sure what the difference would be - real world testing standards would most likely lead to less dense aircraft seating because there is no way they can evacuate 160 people from a 737 in 90 seconds, and we're talking US flight attendants, not Japanese, so they are more prone to panic and scream along with the passengers, instead of calmly leading an evacuation.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,324
I would fully expect that flight attendant (FA) training does not include sacrificing the lives of those with disabilities.
#21
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,263
#22
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,748
My personal opinion is that the greatest impediment to a fast evacuation is baggage fees. Somebody trying to save their roll-aboard from the overhead bin would cause a serious logjam in the aisle, but nobody is going to try to rescue their luggage from the cargo compartment. Get more baggage out of the passenger compartment.