Community
Wiki Posts
Search

B 737 Max

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2023, 10:37 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: EVA Air , * G, QR Privilege Club S
Posts: 5,299
B 737 Max

The never ending troubles of the Max is still going on. Now with the engine de-icing system.
Davvidd is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2023, 7:53 pm
  #2  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,848
Originally Posted by Davvidd
The never ending troubles of the Max is still going on. Now with the engine de-icing system.
Clickbait.

FAA warns of safety hazard from overheating engine housing on Boeing Max jets during anti-icing
U.S. regulators are warning airlines to limit the use of an anti-icing system on Boeing 737 Max jets in dry air to avoid overheating engine-housing parts, which could cause them to break away from the plane.
---
The FAA said if the engine inlet gets too hot, parts of the housing could come off and strike a window, causing decompression and a hazard to passengers in window seats.
---
The FAA said there have been no reports of the overheating problem occurring on Max flights. It said the potential for damage was discovered during flight testing and analysis in June.
---
The FAA is dictating that flight manuals tell pilots and airlines not to use engine anti-ice in dry air for more than five minutes.
SPN Lifer likes this.
TWA884 is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2023, 7:00 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: EVA Air , * G, QR Privilege Club S
Posts: 5,299
It is fairly serious when Operators have to change the MEL to prohibit aircraft dispatch under certain conditions currently allowed.
Davvidd is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2023, 10:03 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,261
Engine anti-ice is not used in dry air so the new five minute limit should not affect operations. That's likely also why they've never had any problems with it in line operations.
TWA884, moondog, SPN Lifer and 2 others like this.
LarryJ is online now  
Old Aug 15, 2023, 7:29 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the Cone of Silence
Programs: UA Gold; AA Dirt; HH Diamond; National Emerald; CONTROL SecretAgent Platinum; KAOS EvilFlyer Gold
Posts: 1,501
Originally Posted by Davvidd
It is fairly serious when Operators have to change the MEL to prohibit aircraft dispatch under certain conditions currently allowed.
Where does it say anything about changing the MEL?
Maxwell Smart is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2023, 7:37 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the Cone of Silence
Programs: UA Gold; AA Dirt; HH Diamond; National Emerald; CONTROL SecretAgent Platinum; KAOS EvilFlyer Gold
Posts: 1,501
Originally Posted by LarryJ
Engine anti-ice is not used in dry air so the new five minute limit should not affect operations. That's likely also why they've never had any problems with it in line operations.
Thanks for the succinct, professional, and understandable explanation.

To me, it's basically saying that if you operate a system incorrectly, bad things COULD happen, but they haven't happened because most likely pilots have NOT operated the system incorrectly.

And yet I'm sure some will come out screaming about the airplane being unsafe, Boeing is evil, etc. etc.
Maxwell Smart is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2023, 10:13 am
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: EVA Air , * G, QR Privilege Club S
Posts: 5,299
Originally Posted by Maxwell Smart
Where does it say anything about changing the MEL?
FAA directive 88 FR 54223.
SPN Lifer likes this.
Davvidd is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.