New US-Caribbean service from Norwegian
#17
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The US/EU(+Iceland/Norway) Open Skies treaty is getting a workout these days. Norwegian announced today that it will use the 7th Freedom rights included in that treaty to launch service between the US and France. With the catch being that "France" in this case is Guadelope and Martinique, two islands in the Caribbean. Service from BOS/JFK/BWI will be 2-3x daily for each route for the winter season.
http://blog.wandr.me/2015/06/norwegi...ibbean-routes/
http://media.norwegian.com/us/#/pres...ibbean-1184050
n.b. Link above goes to my blog. You've been warned.
http://blog.wandr.me/2015/06/norwegi...ibbean-routes/
http://media.norwegian.com/us/#/pres...ibbean-1184050
n.b. Link above goes to my blog. You've been warned.
U.S.-EU flight service is what US-Guadeloupe and U.S.-Martinique flight service is -- just like Hawaii-Japan service is US-Japan service. Glad to see another EEA carrier provide more U.S.-EU service. It's good for competition.
Hawaii has one of the 50 stars on the U.S. flag and is a U.S. state; Puerto Rico, however, is neither a U.S. state nor does it have a star on the U.S. flag. It seems like comparative government, French governmental history and U.S. governmental history lessons may be useful to understand how the attempt at analogy using Puerto Rico just doesn't fly.
Last edited by GUWonder; Jun 26, 2015 at 5:29 am
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,227
Of course, any US-based carriers could set up service on the same routes. The fact that they haven't suggests that they have no good grounds for complaint.
#19
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I have to wonder if these route are going to be more economically viable for Norwegian than for US carrier. I have my doubts about that, but the U.S. should be cheering on the additional European competition for intra-western hemisphere flight services -- inclusive of intra-Western Hemisphere US-EU routes such as this.
#20
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 416
Its rather complicated.
Collectivité territoriale is the generic name for all country subdivisions in France that have an elected local government, which would include mainland France too. St Pierre and Miquelon is the Collectivité Territoriale de Saint Pierre-et-Miquelon, which is a Collectivité d'Outre Mer, and is effectively the same as the Falkland Islands, or South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands - British Overseas Territories - mostly independent, but are still governed by their Sovereign Nation.
Last edited by nmh1204; Jun 26, 2015 at 7:30 pm
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,314
Metropolitan France and Guadaloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, Réunion and French Guiana are all one country, they are each Départaments, (which are the same as a US state, a UK County etc), and thus are Regions of France and have the same legal status as one another, they vote in French and EU elections, they all use the Euro. St Martin, Polynesia etc have the status of Collectivité d'Outre Mer (Overseas collectivity) which is effectively the same as a US unincorportated territory, or a British Overseas Territory, and doesn't afford the same legal status, particularly when it comes to immigration and travel, so if it were possible, Norwegian wouldn't legally be able to fly US to French Polynesia or New Caledonia as they are not part of Europe.
AUA,SXM,CUR are are countries within the Kingdom of the Netherlands, so no go.
But BON = special municipalities of the Netherlands, so techincally possible?
#22
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 416
The French Overseas Departments are legislatively part of France and therefore the EU, I think special municipalities aren't.
#23
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: Kettle Class
Posts: 798
IIRC, St-Martin (the northern, French side of SXM) per the Treaty of Lisbon has the same status as Martinique and Guadaloupe. So, an airline like DY could conceivably start service to the US from there, too - I'm just not sure if there's an airport on the French side.
As well as the Azores, and even Madeira and the Canary Islands (with the right aircraft).
As well as the Azores, and even Madeira and the Canary Islands (with the right aircraft).
I'm not really sure on that one. It would depend on whether they are part of the EU, rather than simply territories of an EU state, and I'm not sure if any of them are part of the EU.
The French Overseas Departments are legislatively part of France and therefore the EU, I think special municipalities aren't.
The French Overseas Departments are legislatively part of France and therefore the EU, I think special municipalities aren't.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not here; there!
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 29,606
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry: BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.1030 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/417)
"IIRC, St-Martin (the northern, French side of SXM) per the Treaty of Lisbon has the same status as Martinique and Guadaloupe. So, an airline like DY could conceivably start service to the US from there, too - I'm just not sure if there's an airport on the French side."
There is, but the runway is too short to accommodate most (all?) commercial jet aircraft:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Espérance_Airport
"IIRC, St-Martin (the northern, French side of SXM) per the Treaty of Lisbon has the same status as Martinique and Guadaloupe. So, an airline like DY could conceivably start service to the US from there, too - I'm just not sure if there's an airport on the French side."
There is, but the runway is too short to accommodate most (all?) commercial jet aircraft:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Espérance_Airport
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
IIRC, St-Martin (the northern, French side of SXM) per the Treaty of Lisbon has the same status as Martinique and Guadaloupe. So, an airline like DY could conceivably start service to the US from there, too - I'm just not sure if there's an airport on the French side.
There is, but the runway is too short to accommodate most (all?) commercial jet aircraft:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Espérance_Airport
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Espérance_Airport
There is scheduled service to the airport, though. I considered it as an option when building my trip on the inaugural JFK-FDF flight.
#28
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
I've written a few posts about the inaugurals:
DYland Time: Norwegian’s Caribbean Inaugural Adventure
Norwegian Kicks off Low-Cost US-French Caribbean Service: Onboard the JFK-Martinique Inaugural Flight
n.b. The link above is to my blog or to one which I am a regular contributor. FT rules require that I disclose that in the post.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
In fact, telephone calls from mainland France to Departments are dialed and billed as standard national long-distance calls. They just have their own area codes within the normal French phone system.