Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Would cabotage ever work?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Would cabotage ever work?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2015 | 12:16 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,508
Originally Posted by nd2010
Some people living in Buffalo choose to fly out of Toronto to another US city. Similarly, people in upstate NY, VT, and NH choose to fly out of Montreal
I doubt anyone living in Buffalo drives the 90-120 minutes to Toronto to go fly back to the US, and then has to drive back another 90-120 minutes upon arrival. For the purpose of what? Going through customs 4 times instead of 2 times and paying more for the flight?

It works the other way around. Torontonians go to Buffalo to fly to American cities since it's a lot less expensive given the lower taxes in Buffalo vs Toronto.
KoKoBuddy is offline  
Old Jan 14, 2015 | 7:50 pm
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,784
Originally Posted by joejones
While we're fantasizing, one obvious alternative would be for the US and Canada to adopt a Schengen-like system so that there is no passport control between them at all. That would be amazingly good for business in general, not just for travel. Likelihood low, though, especially given all the security paranoia in the US.
Once we're fantasizing, why not just have Canada dissolving and the provinces all applying for statehood? It's about equally like.

nkedel is offline  
Old Jan 14, 2015 | 8:07 pm
  #33  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,103
What would stop a U.S. airline from buying up an operator in Canada, renaming it Delta Airlines Canada LLC dba Delta Airlines and then just offer flights like YYZ-MSP-YEG on that license.
Ber2dca is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2015 | 9:05 am
  #34  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 472
Originally Posted by Ber2dca
What would stop a U.S. airline from buying up an operator in Canada, renaming it Delta Airlines Canada LLC dba Delta Airlines and then just offer flights like YYZ-MSP-YEG on that license.
That kind of airline would probably have to be majority owned by Canadians, not Delta. Passengers would also have to go through customs twice (4 times for a round trip). There might (?) be regulations preventing it if ticketed on the same ticket.....Maybe look up schedules to see if there are flights which could connect, like YYZ-ORD-YVR.

EDIT: Looked up DL schedules. They say no flight but, looking at the schedule, you can piece together such a flight.

Example: Winnepeg - MSP - Toronto
YWG arrives in MSP at 1025 am, next flight to YYZ is 1:42 pm.
YWG arrives in MSP at 613 pm, next flight to YYZ is 735 pm.

Last edited by Box5; Jan 15, 2015 at 9:10 am
Box5 is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2015 | 9:57 am
  #35  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: All around the world
Programs: Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 614
This would only work if there was no passport control between the two countries. In such a case there would be no difference flying from JFK to SFO via ORD or YYZ. In fact it would probably work fairly well for us passengers as it would increase competition and open new routing options.

I can't see it happening from a political point of view though. At least not in the close future.

EDIT: Anyone knows what would happen if AC and UA were allowed to compete on domestic routes in the US/Canada? I mean for Star Alliance.

Last edited by valdor; Jan 15, 2015 at 1:30 pm
valdor is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2015 | 1:06 pm
  #36  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 472
Originally Posted by valdor
EDIT: Anyone knows what would happen if AC and UA were allowed to compete on domestic rountes in the US/Canada? I mean for *A.
Canadian costs are higher so I would suspect that an open US-Canada market would hurt Air Canada. Delta's hubs at MSP and DTW could siphon traffic from YYZ. If there were an open border, BUF would siphon more traffic from YYZ.
Box5 is offline  
Old Jan 16, 2015 | 6:51 am
  #37  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SEA once more (previously CDG and NRT)
Programs: Former DL DM and UA 1k, now a J class free agent (UA Plat, DL Plat, AS MVP Gold, Marriott Titanum)
Posts: 2,458
Very briefly, after Ansett failed, UA was allowed cabotage on SYD<->MEL. If you dig far enough back in the Trip reports forum, you can probably find some posts related to it.

Passengers were able to buy tickets for MEL<->SYD stand alone without connecting to a UA trans-pacific flight.

IIRC, the cabotage rights lasted only a month or two.

EDIT: Found some old threads about it:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ights-yet.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...-december.html

Last edited by SEA-Flyer; Jan 16, 2015 at 7:27 am
SEA-Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2015 | 8:16 pm
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 16,188
Originally Posted by Ber2dca
What would stop a U.S. airline from buying up an operator in Canada, renaming it Delta Airlines Canada LLC dba Delta Airlines and then just offer flights like YYZ-MSP-YEG on that license.
Well, for one thing, Canadian law. Foreign companies can not own more than a certain percent of a Canadian carrier (I forget what it is exactly now, maybe 25%). So it would never go through in the first place.

In fact, IIRC, when there was a fight for CP before AC bought it, one of the issues with the competing bid was it was going to have too much of an ownership stake by AMR, the parent of AA at the time.
emcampbe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.