Best and most recognizable planes ever built
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHA, MAN;
Programs: Delta DM 1 MM; Hz PC
Posts: 11,169
Best and most recognizable planes ever built
OK I apologize if there is already a thread on this. In your opinion what are the most recognizable and made the biggest contribution planes ever built.
1. The Boeing 747
2. The Boeing 737 - at any one time there is always a 737 flying somewhere. A truly ubiquitous plane.
3. The SR71 Blackbird =-semi -stealth exceedingly fast - a beautiful plane
4. The Concord - made supersonic travel available for many.
5. The B-29 Super-Stratofortress -ended WW11 and dropped the atomic bombs -place in history guaranteed.
I would also add the F-14 Tomcat and the Lancaster bomber of WWII
What is your opinion?
1. The Boeing 747
2. The Boeing 737 - at any one time there is always a 737 flying somewhere. A truly ubiquitous plane.
3. The SR71 Blackbird =-semi -stealth exceedingly fast - a beautiful plane
4. The Concord - made supersonic travel available for many.
5. The B-29 Super-Stratofortress -ended WW11 and dropped the atomic bombs -place in history guaranteed.
I would also add the F-14 Tomcat and the Lancaster bomber of WWII
What is your opinion?
Last edited by GRALISTAIR; Apr 14, 2013 at 7:56 pm
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
I'd take 1,3 and 4 from your list. There's a lot of planes in the sky with the same basic size and shape of the 737, though the 73 has definitely by far made the biggest contribution to commercial air travel. Really the only thing that visually differentiates it for me is the flattened engine cowl.
As for #5, damn kids don't remember those planes. They may recognize it, but can't name it. Maybe replace it with the F-14.
As for #5, damn kids don't remember those planes. They may recognize it, but can't name it. Maybe replace it with the F-14.
#7
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: Enough to travel better
Posts: 2,020
Agree with number 1. Regarding number 2, I think the 737's grandparent, the 707, is even more recognizable just because it's been around longer. Moreover, the Douglas DC-8 and DC-9 series were equally recognizable.
Agree with Wally Bird: the Douglas DC-3 still is one of the most recognizable planes on earth.
Agree with Wally Bird: the Douglas DC-3 still is one of the most recognizable planes on earth.
#10
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cypress Hills Research Center
Posts: 5,295
I agree with removing the 737, not distinctive enough.
In terms of aesthetics, I'd add:
the P-38 Lightening, the X-15, and the Soviet Ekranoplan. And a +1 to the SR-71.
Recognizeable, I'd add the B2, the B-52, the F-4 Phantom and the An-225.
My personal likes include the F-104B Starfighter, the P-40 Warhawk (w/Flying Tigers livery which I still think AA should have used) and the A-10 (fugly but I like it).
In terms of aesthetics, I'd add:
the P-38 Lightening, the X-15, and the Soviet Ekranoplan. And a +1 to the SR-71.
Recognizeable, I'd add the B2, the B-52, the F-4 Phantom and the An-225.
My personal likes include the F-104B Starfighter, the P-40 Warhawk (w/Flying Tigers livery which I still think AA should have used) and the A-10 (fugly but I like it).
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...wonder-204505/
The best-selling 737 is a true record breaker, but surprisingly struggled for life in its early years. Boeing even once offered to sell it to the Japanese
The list of trivia about the Boeing 737 is inversely proportional to the size of this relatively small, but immensely successful jet airliner. With more than 6,100 on order and over 4,100 in service worldwide, it should not be surprising, for example, that on average more than 1,250 737s are in the air at any one time. In the 5min it takes to read this feature, more than 65 737s will have landed and taken off.
The list of trivia about the Boeing 737 is inversely proportional to the size of this relatively small, but immensely successful jet airliner. With more than 6,100 on order and over 4,100 in service worldwide, it should not be surprising, for example, that on average more than 1,250 737s are in the air at any one time. In the 5min it takes to read this feature, more than 65 737s will have landed and taken off.
#15
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,452
If a plane was unsuccessful and stayed rare, it is not "recognizable", because few have seen it. If it was successful, it made a contribution - but if it inspired close copies then it is not "recognizable" either.
Boeing 747 is a plane which is obviously both recognizable and has made a contribution. No one copied the hump - itself copied from Carvair, but that is a propeller plane.
Now, looking at other planes with appreciable contribution, either themselves or via copies:
Boeing 707 - copied by DC-8 and Convair 880/990. Is DC-8 immediately recognizable?
Boeing 737 - copied by A320 and others, as pointed out.
Boeing 727 - a copy of Hawker-Siddeley Trident. As is Tu-154.
Douglas DC-9/MD-80/-90/B717/ARJ21 - copies of BAC 1-11. As are Fokker 28/100/70, and Tu-134, and CRJ.
Airbus 300/310 - copied by Boeing 767
DC-10/MD-11 - should be fairly "recognizable". No copies, and Tristar is different enough.
Concorde - little contribution, with just 14 frames in service. And how readily is it distinguished from Tu-144? Yes, stand different on ground, Concorde´s smooth ogive wing, Tu-144´s canards... but considering how few airports see Concorde regularly, how many people would immediately recognize Tu-144 as something different from Concorde?
Boeing 747 is a plane which is obviously both recognizable and has made a contribution. No one copied the hump - itself copied from Carvair, but that is a propeller plane.
Now, looking at other planes with appreciable contribution, either themselves or via copies:
Boeing 707 - copied by DC-8 and Convair 880/990. Is DC-8 immediately recognizable?
Boeing 737 - copied by A320 and others, as pointed out.
Boeing 727 - a copy of Hawker-Siddeley Trident. As is Tu-154.
Douglas DC-9/MD-80/-90/B717/ARJ21 - copies of BAC 1-11. As are Fokker 28/100/70, and Tu-134, and CRJ.
Airbus 300/310 - copied by Boeing 767
DC-10/MD-11 - should be fairly "recognizable". No copies, and Tristar is different enough.
Concorde - little contribution, with just 14 frames in service. And how readily is it distinguished from Tu-144? Yes, stand different on ground, Concorde´s smooth ogive wing, Tu-144´s canards... but considering how few airports see Concorde regularly, how many people would immediately recognize Tu-144 as something different from Concorde?