Lost cause? Changing names on a non-refundable ticket
#16
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues, Information Desk & San Francisco



Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,319
I kmow it'd be impossible to manage...
But I do feel for people who bought non changeable tickets and then something totally unexpected happens. Not so much breaking a leg (that's what travel insurance is for) but like a job transfer or sudden unavoidable unpredictable move or death or whatever.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,811
People... or companies? I presume that's your employer, not you, springing for paid F for 2+ hours. For most normal people the idea of spending 3X your own money to secure a refundable ticket is not tenable at all. Do you do it when it's your dime?
#18
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Fairmont Platinum, Aeroplan Diamond, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 18,686
Imo.. the no frills method airlines are adopting is going to end up hurting consumers.. Sure that the ticket is sold non refundable/non changeable.. Charge a fair fee to get it done, so that customer's don't feel angry, will come back and fly with the airline..
Seems there is a line drawn by the authorities, when airlines tried to charge for carry-on baggage. That idea was eliminated pretty quickly.. Seems like ticketing is an area that needs to be addressed as well..
Seems there is a line drawn by the authorities, when airlines tried to charge for carry-on baggage. That idea was eliminated pretty quickly.. Seems like ticketing is an area that needs to be addressed as well..
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,811
...when airlines tried to charge for carry-on baggage. That idea was eliminated pretty quickly..
#20



Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SAN
Programs: Delta Gold. Hilton Diamond. Hyatt Explorist.
Posts: 1,775
Well, having bought the non-refundable tickets the OP is actually totally hosed. Nobody buys refundable tickets for leisure applications because the price differential is so great. So everyone does what the OP does and then when a conflict arises they hope maybe the ironclad rules on non-refundable fares might turn out to be not so ironclad if they ask really nicely. The world would be better if there were less of a premium charged for refundable, or no-fee value-bankable, tickets.
#21



Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SAN
Programs: Delta Gold. Hilton Diamond. Hyatt Explorist.
Posts: 1,775
Mine is the exact opposite reaction. There are many people, including me, who travel only on refundable/changeable tickets (I am fortunate to have paid F for 2+ hours). Who in their right mind would buy refundable tix if they could pay less and get them refunded?
While I know that OP is personally frustrated, the reason people pay for flexibility is that it's flexible.
While I know that OP is personally frustrated, the reason people pay for flexibility is that it's flexible.
#22
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Fairmont Platinum, Aeroplan Diamond, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 18,686
Don't you understand what's happened in the industry? Customer anger doesn't matter anymore. There are only three or four major airlines left. Each is worse than the next. It's an oligopoly that no longer has to respond to customer objections to anything. If you don't like it, take the bus..
Here in Canada, its' even worse, we have a perceived monopoly.. But AC has come around to understand that things can't possibly remain the same, if the airline wants to remain viable.. Although enhancements (negative) have been introduced last year because the entire industry was heading that way.. the general sense is AC hasn't completely ignored the customer service aspect and the factor of public perception.. In its dealings with customers, and employees..
"Remember, we always provide one personal item free of charge per customer. Personal items (e.g. purse, small backpack, briefcase, etc.) must fit underneath the seat, so the dimensions must not exceed 16 x 14 x 12 inches (40 x 35 x 30 cm).
Additionally, the following carry-on items are not counted towards a customer's carry-on bag allowance and can be brought with you on all flights free of charge - umbrella, camera, infant diaper bag, assistive devices, outer garments (e.g. coats, hats, and wraps), stroller, reading material, and food for the flight."
I guess in a sense you are correct, and I am correct.. There is one personal carry-on allowed for free on Spirit.. IIRC Spirit originally wanted to charge for all carry ons and the regulators stepped in..
#23
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
Usually. I need flexibility and I'm willing to pay for it for non-business travel. I know it's expensive, but it's what I need. If you don't need flexibility, don't pay for it and accept the fact that there are occasions when things are beyond your control and you made the wrong choice.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,595
There are also 'in between' fares - not fully flexible, cancel with no charge etc. but not 'no changes no refunds' either - you get to make changes or cancellations with a penalty - and they often are not 3x more (a little more, yes). I know quite a few people who choose those.
Usually. I need flexibility and I'm willing to pay for it for non-business travel. I know it's expensive, but it's what I need. If you don't need flexibility, don't pay for it and accept the fact that there are occasions when things are beyond your control and you made the wrong choice.
#25
Moderator: Mileage Run, InterContinental Hotels


Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 6,431

