FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   4 or 5 Children in First Class (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/1238959-4-5-children-first-class.html)

Ancien Maestro Jul 20, 2011 9:29 pm


Originally Posted by LondonElite (Post 16766214)
What is your point? Is this some financial injustice moan?

Seriously.. this is the first time I've ever heard of adults being jealous of kids in first..

First is available to whoever books it.. or gets upgraded to,.

CX HK Jul 20, 2011 9:33 pm


Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro (Post 16767625)
Seriously.. this is the first time I've ever heard of adults being jealous of kids in first..

First is available to whoever books it.. or gets upgraded to,.

But if you had booked a first class ticket, looked forward to it for a long time, stepped onto the plane and saw 4-5 kids there, tell me with a straight face your heart wouldn't sink as you cringe and moan!! :P

Ancien Maestro Jul 20, 2011 9:37 pm


Originally Posted by CX HK (Post 16767642)
But if you had booked a first class ticket, looked forward to it for a long time, stepped onto the plane and saw 4-5 kids there, tell me with a straight face your heart wouldn't sink as you cringe and moan!! :P

I've got two kids.. so the more kids the merrier..:p

pinworm Jul 21, 2011 1:05 am

I personally feel that children should not be allowed to fly at all except in documented emergencies, and then only in the last rows of the plane where smokers used to sit.

If you have a kid, get used to the idea that you should not be in bars, pubs, restraunts (aside from untermensch ones like Shoney's and McDonalds) and aircraft for at least 14 years.

cbn42 Jul 21, 2011 1:36 am


Originally Posted by kwtaper (Post 16762764)
BWI to PHX yesterday 4 or 5 children in First. Ugh. And yes, my spouse and I were in coach.

OP, did you accidentally leave out part of your message? Did you mean to go on and say that the kids were loud and obnoxious, or anything like that?

And just out of curiosity, were the kids sitting together (siblings or friends), or randomly scattered throughout first class?

LondonElite Jul 21, 2011 1:57 am


Originally Posted by CX HK (Post 16767642)
But if you had booked a first class ticket, looked forward to it for a long time, stepped onto the plane and saw 4-5 kids there, tell me with a straight face your heart wouldn't sink as you cringe and moan!! :P

Well, the OP sat (and paid for) a ticket in Y, so I don't think this applies.

LondonElite Jul 21, 2011 1:58 am


Originally Posted by pinworm (Post 16768232)
I personally feel that children should not be allowed to fly at all except in documented emergencies, and then only in the last rows of the plane where smokers used to sit.

If you have a kid, get used to the idea that you should not be in bars, pubs, restraunts (aside from untermensch ones like Shoney's and McDonalds) and aircraft for at least 14 years.

You sound like a charmer. I feel this way about 50% of the adult population.

Analise Jul 21, 2011 5:26 am


Originally Posted by kwtaper (Post 16762764)
BWI to PHX yesterday 4 or 5 children in First. Ugh. And yes, my spouse and I were in coach.

Then you weren't bothered by them. What's your problem?

florin Jul 21, 2011 6:20 am


Originally Posted by masonuc (Post 16765765)
I have 2 kids under the age of 4 and they have pretty much traveled exclusively in FC thanks to upgrades (or miles used). And no they are not well-behaved (usually) because kids that aged are rarely well-behaved and there isn't always a lot the parents can even do about it (except try). If US Air had any problem with this they'd ban children from FC, since they haven't your complaint is with them, not the parents. It's one thing if an 8 year old kid is misbehaved but a 2 year old is a 2 year old and sometimes there is nothing you can do.

:td:
I too disagree with you. "Kids are kids" is an excuse. If you can't control your children in public then don't take them with you. I've heard that excuse from a LOT of lazy or stupid parents who just let their kids do whatever. Of course it's easier to embrace that stupid excuse and just sit on your @$$ rather than actually take on your role as a parent and look after the kid(s). Also, when you travel with children you have to make sure they are entertained... bring toys, coloring books, whatever. Of course they're going to scream if they're bored. That's just parents being stupid and/or lazy.

I don't care about kids in F. If they behave, they can fly in any class. If the parents let them do whatever then they should not be flying at all.

MiamiAirport Formerly NY George Jul 21, 2011 6:37 am

If I am flying in Y I'm not sure why I should give a cow's hide about who is in F. In fact, if I saw all the children on the flight in the F cabin it might be one of the very, very few times I was happy that my upgrade did not clear.

As with most FFs, I cringe when I see children coming into the F cabin. However, if the children are properly behaved I see no issue. Sadly, given that too many children today are not properly parented (and income level seems to be make no difference) I make it a point to compliment parents when their children behave as they appropriately should do in an "adult place", as my mother used to call it.

masonuc Jul 21, 2011 8:37 am

I don't think you understand kids, or at least ALL kids. Because there are times some kids (boys especially) in the 0-5 range are always going to be out of control. Nothing you can do and it doesn't mean you are stupid or lazy. You might be a great parent but your kid is having a bad day or some kids are very difficult/impossible to control all the time. And that might be unpredictable -- he might be great on some flights and a complete terror on others. Those families have to travel sometimes, or even just want to travel, and should be allowed to.



Originally Posted by florin (Post 16768888)
:td:
I too disagree with you. "Kids are kids" is an excuse. If you can't control your children in public then don't take them with you. I've heard that excuse from a LOT of lazy or stupid parents who just let their kids do whatever. Of course it's easier to embrace that stupid excuse and just sit on your @$$ rather than actually take on your role as a parent and look after the kid(s). Also, when you travel with children you have to make sure they are entertained... bring toys, coloring books, whatever. Of course they're going to scream if they're bored. That's just parents being stupid and/or lazy.

I don't care about kids in F. If they behave, they can fly in any class. If the parents let them do whatever then they should not be flying at all.


_ABB_ Jul 21, 2011 11:31 am

What's the big deal? When i flew with my parents and grandparents as a kid they always put us in first. We were dressed in jacket and tie (tie only with grandparents) and were always well behaved - there were consequences for not being well behaved.

The only time I caught a look/grief was from JFK to LHR then onto NBO (Nairobi) in the 'old first class' on a 747 - someone made a comment when I ordered 3 steaks and 2 cheese platters (I was 14 and I ate it all).

Seeing kids up front does not bother me at all. If it bothers you, you will not enjoy flying as they are up front often.

SFO777 Jul 21, 2011 11:36 am


Originally Posted by _ABB_ (Post 16770736)
The only time I caught a look/grief was from JFK to LHR then onto NBO (Nairobi) in the 'old first class' on a 747 - someone made a comment when I ordered 3 steaks and 2 cheese platters (I was 14 and I ate it all).

Oh to be young again! :D

pinniped Jul 21, 2011 11:51 am

I would love to occupy an F cabin with 4 or 5 children.

That lowers the odds that there will be a disruptive, obnoxious, self-important, liquored-up, loud, smelly passenger causing serious problems in F. ^

In my lifetime of probably around 1,000 total flights (give or take), I've only been on 1 where there was a problem caused by a child. (That story is another thread of its own...all I'll say is that it was mid-90's, AA, the captain handled the problem well, and it ended up not creating irrops.)

I've been on 3 or 4 where some sort of problem was caused by an adult - something serious enough to prevent the flight from departing ontime. I've also been on 1 (inflight) where an adult was disruptive enough to generate a warning that the captain would divert to have him arrested.

I realize that the odds of problems are slim either way, but I truly believe they likelihood of a child causing a serious problem are smaller than the likelihood of an adult doing so - especially in F with the booze flowing.

localady Jul 21, 2011 12:14 pm


Originally Posted by Silver Fox (Post 16763299)
Unfortunately there are "parents" who believe that the FA's are there for childcare, and said "parents" don't have the wit to think that their li'l angels could possibly upset people around them, and let them run amok because it is easier that way. In a number of ways people seem to leave their common sense at home when they travel.

But - if the seats have been paid for then, like it or lump it, they are entitled to be there. Money/miles/status shouts.....


Originally Posted by phb (Post 16763330)
Some airlines (like BA) make claims for the peace and quiet of their F cabins. Were you to be bothered by noisy or unruly children there then perhaps you have a point. Other than that, it's a public space, they have a ticket, they have as much right to F as you do. No more, no less.


Originally Posted by dcpatti (Post 16763813)
Now if the kids were in F and making such a ruckus that the OP, in Y, were disturbed, that would be another story but I'd imagine/hope/pray the parents did their parental duty before it got to that level..

Agree... agree... agree.. While I'm not sure that all kids appreciate being up front, if they are in a paid seat (money or miles or status etc) what can anybody say... I don't think it's necessarily the kids per se... I blame the parents for not having control of their kids. A good deal of the time, I've seen it where the parents are basically out to lunch and think that either the FAs should be babysitting their kids or people should worship their little offsprings the same way that they do. When mommy and daddy pop down and goo-goo and ga-ga over baby Matilda while little lord Beauregard sticks his finger down his throat and pukes all over the passenger in the next seat and sweet missy Daisy throws a hissy fit and threatens to bite the FA it's no wonder people don't like kids up front (or in the back for that matter)..


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:40 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.