Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

4 or 5 Children in First Class

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

4 or 5 Children in First Class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 11:59 am
  #16  
Moderator: American AAdvantage & Marriott Bonvoy
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PHX
Programs: American ExPlat; Marriott/SPG Lifetime Plat; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,131
Moderator Note

Since this is a general travel issue, and not specific to US, we'll move it over to the TravelBuzz forum where it will benefit (hopefully) from broader exposure and discussion.

-AZ
A US Airways Forum Moderator
AZ Travels the World is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 12:18 pm
  #17  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Programs: I am a lowly ant
Posts: 1,756
Originally Posted by geo1005
Clearly the airline disagrees with you 100% as they allow both revenue and award FC tickets for minors. Malaysian Airlines is the only airline that currently has a ban on children in the FC cabin. Perhaps they are an option for you?
Not even close.

Malaysia merely opted not to fit bassinets to the FC cabin on one of their plane types. You can still take lap infants I believe, and children age 2-102 in their own seat.
meester69 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 2:44 pm
  #18  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the Cone of Silence
Programs: UA Gold; AA Dirt; HH Diamond; National Emerald; CONTROL SecretAgent Platinum; KAOS EvilFlyer Gold
Posts: 1,679
Originally Posted by DCGooner
Presumably you paid for a coach seat, so why is it your concern who's sitting in F? Is it that you and your wife didn't get a free upgrade? If so, that's life. Someone else paid for those seats with cash or miles, or perhaps someone had higher status than you. Either way, that's really none of your business. All you need to know is that you didn't get upgraded.

Or maybe you have a philosophical problem with kids in F. If that's the case, then (as someone already pointed out) US disagrees with you and your opinion isn't particularly relevant.

A few months ago my family and I flew in F on a DCA-PHX-SNA-PHX-DCA vacation. The dirty looks that my 2 kids got made me smile at these peoples' self-induced misery. If you want to resent what other people do with their money or miles, go for it. But I can assure you we had a great time up in F (and were treated very well by all of the FAs) and we'll continue to travel that way as money and miles permit -- your indignation notwithstanding.
+1 ^

Couldn't have said it better, except maybe to start with "........and....?"
Maxwell Smart is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 3:17 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,430
I don't give a rat's posterior where anybody sits on the plane, regardless of age. It's all about behavior; well behaved children and adults are equally welcome to sit next to me, regardless of which cabin I might occupy. Badly behaved children and adults are most UNwelcome to sit anywhere near me.

Bad behavior comes in four main flavors for both children and adults, including:

* Noisy
* Smelly
* Physically Intrusive
* Health and/or Safety Risk

Whether a particular behavior fits one of these flavors is a matter of opinion, and the opinions can be pretty polarized (witness the ongoing, never-ending argument over reclining seats).

But generally:

* If you make noise that can be heard from more than 2 rows away, I consider you noisy.

* If you can be smelled from more than 1 seat away, I consider you smelly (I have a lower tolerance for some types of smellies, as I have rather severe allergies and get shooting pains in my head from almost all perfumes and colognes in the world).

* If you or any of your belongings intrude over or under the armrest or seatback into my seat, or if you continuously impact my seat (or me) such that the impact is translated to my body, or if you impact my belongings in the overhead or under the seat in front of me, I consider you physically intrusive.

* If you bring contagious disease aboard, I consider you a health risk. And if you become intoxicated or otherwise impaired, or attempt to lift a bag that is too heavy for you above my head, or engage in other behavior which might tend to put other people at risk of physical injury or damage to their belongings, I consider you to be a safety risk.

Those are just the basics, of course; everyone evaluates the behavior of others in their own fashion.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 3:29 pm
  #20  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 851
I have 2 kids under the age of 4 and they have pretty much traveled exclusively in FC thanks to upgrades (or miles used). And no they are not well-behaved (usually) because kids that aged are rarely well-behaved and there isn't always a lot the parents can even do about it (except try). If US Air had any problem with this they'd ban children from FC, since they haven't your complaint is with them, not the parents. It's one thing if an 8 year old kid is misbehaved but a 2 year old is a 2 year old and sometimes there is nothing you can do.
masonuc is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 4:04 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 44
Originally Posted by masonuc
I have 2 kids under the age of 4 and they have pretty much traveled exclusively in FC thanks to upgrades (or miles used). And no they are not well-behaved (usually) because kids that aged are rarely well-behaved and there isn't always a lot the parents can even do about it (except try). If US Air had any problem with this they'd ban children from FC, since they haven't your complaint is with them, not the parents. It's one thing if an 8 year old kid is misbehaved but a 2 year old is a 2 year old and sometimes there is nothing you can do.
I couldn't disagree with you more. I raised two kids (now teens) who were typically well behaved, especially in public. And my kids are far from unusual. I've met many young children who are smart enough to understand what behavior is expected and act accordingly. There may be the occasional bad moment, but if, as you say, the children are "rarely well-behaved" then it definitely IS the parents' fault. (assuming, of course, that the child doesn't have a disability which causes what might be seen as poor behavior)

As their parent, it's your responsibility to do what you can to prevent your children from annoying others with their bad behavior - especially when those people have no way to escape when your little darlings are less than darling.
ShrinkRay is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 4:21 pm
  #22  
20 Countries Visited1M60 Nights15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IAD
Programs: UA Premier Platinum; Marriott Platinum
Posts: 441
Originally Posted by ShrinkRay
I couldn't disagree with you more. I raised two kids (now teens) who were typically well behaved, especially in public. And my kids are far from unusual. I've met many young children who are smart enough to understand what behavior is expected and act accordingly.
But there's a huge gray area within that. I've been on an IAD-MCO flight where my kids asked a loud question about something (baggage buggies maybe) and the guy across the aisle shot me a dirty look. No bouncing in the seats, no crawling in the aisles, but some people apparently have a higher standard than that.
Yuengling is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 4:40 pm
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
Originally Posted by kwtaper
BWI to PHX yesterday 4 or 5 children in First. Ugh. And yes, my spouse and I were in coach.
What is your point? Is this some financial injustice moan?

Last edited by LondonElite; Jul 20, 2011 at 5:19 pm
LondonElite is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 4:48 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 44
Originally Posted by Yuengling
But there's a huge gray area within that. I've been on an IAD-MCO flight where my kids asked a loud question about something (baggage buggies maybe) and the guy across the aisle shot me a dirty look. No bouncing in the seats, no crawling in the aisles, but some people apparently have a higher standard than that.
I wouldn't call speaking a little louder than normal "bad behavior" if (as I'm sure you did) you asked your kids to lower their volume a little and they complied. I've been seated near adults who find it necessary to conduct their conversation at (what sounds to me like) shouting volume.

I remember getting dirty looks from a couple as I walked into a restaurant holding a sleeping baby (who stayed asleep the whole time). I think some people just wish the whole world was their private child-free zone.
ShrinkRay is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 4:50 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: YYZ-HKT-CWL
Programs: aeroplan E .HH.
Posts: 994
^^
Originally Posted by WillCAD
I don't give a rat's posterior where anybody sits on the plane, regardless of age. It's all about behavior; well behaved children and adults are equally welcome to sit next to me, regardless of which cabin I might occupy. Badly behaved children and adults are most UNwelcome to sit anywhere near me.

Bad behavior comes in four main flavors for both children and adults, including:

* Noisy
* Smelly
* Physically Intrusive
* Health and/or Safety Risk

Whether a particular behavior fits one of these flavors is a matter of opinion, and the opinions can be pretty polarized (witness the ongoing, never-ending argument over reclining seats).

But generally:

* If you make noise that can be heard from more than 2 rows away, I consider you noisy.

* If you can be smelled from more than 1 seat away, I consider you smelly (I have a lower tolerance for some types of smellies, as I have rather severe allergies and get shooting pains in my head from almost all perfumes and colognes in the world).

* If you or any of your belongings intrude over or under the armrest or seatback into my seat, or if you continuously impact my seat (or me) such that the impact is translated to my body, or if you impact my belongings in the overhead or under the seat in front of me, I consider you physically intrusive.

* If you bring contagious disease aboard, I consider you a health risk. And if you become intoxicated or otherwise impaired, or attempt to lift a bag that is too heavy for you above my head, or engage in other behavior which might tend to put other people at risk of physical injury or damage to their belongings, I consider you to be a safety risk.

Those are just the basics, of course; everyone evaluates the behavior of others in their own fashion.
thaidai is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 5:13 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boise, ID
Programs: Virtuoso
Posts: 617
I sat across the aisle last weekend from two kids in F whose dad was in front of me. They behaved beautifully. And they were extremely polite. It was great to see. Much better than the adult nose picker I sat beside on an earlier flight.
Travel K is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 5:22 pm
  #27  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Fairmont Platinum, Aeroplan Diamond, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 18,686
Originally Posted by beachbrew
Major pet peeve of mine, if its one child and they are well behaved I don't mind. I've also been on a flight with a make-a-wish family. Once again don't mind. But one of my percieved biggest benefits to flying in F is no children. I have however had one flight where the kids where talking off their shirts and climbing all over the seats, their grandparents and the flight attendents did nothing. At one point one of the kids asked the rather attractive lady next to me to take off her shirt. If i behaved like they were, the plane would have been diverated and I would've been hauled off to the pokey.
Same thing goes for the club, I won't buy a club pass because, i have been in the club on day passes (credit card, preffered extras) and had to deal with screaming children. At least I can find a bar, get some real beer instead of that budlight crap and not have to worry about kids.
I would have said something directly to kids.. to ensure they know what they are saying is inappropriate..
Ancien Maestro is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 7:44 pm
  #28  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Programs: AA Plat 2MM, MR Gold, Avis Pref
Posts: 41,109
~18 hours of flying (one way transpac) for my two elementary age kids next week in F/J.. and I (nor will they) feel sorry for the OP doing the walk of shame back to Y

but regarding the stuff below

first I don't mind sitting next to a child in Y; you know 99.95 % of the time, shoulder room will not be an issue, they can squeeze out without me moving an inch from my aisle seat, and they don't get drunk

Originally Posted by WillCAD
I don't give a rat's posterior where anybody sits on the plane, regardless of age. It's all about behavior; well behaved children and adults are equally welcome to sit next to me, regardless of which cabin I might occupy. Badly behaved children and adults are most UNwelcome to sit anywhere near me.

Bad behavior comes in four main flavors for both children and adults, including:

* Noisy mostly this is the obnoxious business person on a cell phone, followed by the obnoxious conference goers who have to come talk over the person in the aisle seat for what seems to be eternity.. this dwarfs the amount of times a chid's noise has bothered me
* Smelly usually this is a female who happened (I presume) to spill a quart bottle of cheap perfume on her and didn't bother to change followed by some 20 something granola type just off the mountains, bike trip etc who just made it to the plane and is till picking bark out of their hair-now I know some hate certain foods but that as never bothered me so I don't count it as a "smelly" problem
* Physically Intrusive 99.9999% of the time this is a fat adult, usually male but by no means is that a given; matter of fact this is the only intrusion I've ever experienced
* Health and/or Safety Risk the only issue I know of is the one time I was in the exit row and this one guy had no clue what the FA was saying in English.. he stayed in his exit row seat though, but he never spoke a word of English and when the FA asked if he understood, he just stared at her, turned around to someone he knew and asked them something (not in English) and then the FA got acknowledgements from all but him and just let him stay.. AA Eagle for the record

Whether a particular behavior fits one of these flavors is a matter of opinion, and the opinions can be pretty polarized (witness the ongoing, never-ending argument over reclining seats).

But generally:

* If you make noise that can be heard from more than 2 rows away, I consider you noisy.

* If you can be smelled from more than 1 seat away, I consider you smelly (I have a lower tolerance for some types of smellies, as I have rather severe allergies and get shooting pains in my head from almost all perfumes and colognes in the world).

* If you or any of your belongings intrude over or under the armrest or seatback into my seat, or if you continuously impact my seat (or me) such that the impact is translated to my body, or if you impact my belongings in the overhead or under the seat in front of me, I consider you physically intrusive.

* If you bring contagious disease aboard, I consider you a health risk. And if you become intoxicated or otherwise impaired, or attempt to lift a bag that is too heavy for you above my head, or engage in other behavior which might tend to put other people at risk of physical injury or damage to their belongings, I consider you to be a safety risk.

Those are just the basics, of course; everyone evaluates the behavior of others in their own fashion.
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 8:25 pm
  #29  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,430
Originally Posted by ShrinkRay
***I think some people just wish the whole world was their private child-free zone.
That is true. And those people are jerks.

Likewise, some parents think that the entire world is their child's personal playground. Those people are also jerks.

I prefer it when people on both sides of the equation have just a little bit of common sense.

Last edited by Ocn Vw 1K; Jul 21, 2011 at 9:30 am Reason: Corrected the name of the member quoted by this member and indicated that it was part of a larger post..
WillCAD is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2011 | 9:22 pm
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: UA Million Miler (lite). NY Metro area.
Posts: 15,436
Originally Posted by AZ Travels the World
Since this is a general travel issue, and not specific to US, we'll move it over to the TravelBuzz forum where it will benefit (hopefully) from broader exposure and discussion.

-AZ
A US Airways Forum Moderator
Ok. Now this makes sense. First class on USAir is more like coach, so I understand why the children sat up front.
dhammer53 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.